linux-iio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Cc: <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>, <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	<s.hauer@pengutronix.de>, <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	<alexandre.torgue@st.com>, <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	<lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com>, <songqiang1304521@gmail.com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: remove iio_triggered_buffer_postenable()/iio_triggered_buffer_predisable()
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 16:40:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200531164020.765822dc@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200525113855.178821-3-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>

On Mon, 25 May 2020 14:38:55 +0300
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:

> From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
> 
> This patch should be squashed into the first one, as the first one is
> breaking the build (intentionally) to make the IIO core files easier to
> review.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
> ---

Friend poke.  Version log?

Other than the wistful comment below (which I'm not expecting you to
do anything about btw!) whole series looks good to me.

These are obviously no functional changes (I think) so it's only really patch 2 that
could do with more eyes and acks.

Far as I can tell that case is fine as well because of the protections
on being in the right mode, but more eyes on that would be great.

So assuming that's fine, what commit message do you want me to use for
the fused single patch?

Thanks,

Jonathan

>  static const struct iio_trigger_ops atlas_interrupt_trigger_ops = {
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dummy/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c b/drivers/iio/dummy/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c
> index 17606eca42b4..8e13c53d4360 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dummy/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dummy/iio_simple_dummy_buffer.c
> @@ -99,20 +99,6 @@ static irqreturn_t iio_simple_dummy_trigger_h(int irq, void *p)
>  }
>  
>  static const struct iio_buffer_setup_ops iio_simple_dummy_buffer_setup_ops = {
> -	/*
> -	 * iio_triggered_buffer_postenable:
> -	 * Generic function that simply attaches the pollfunc to the trigger.
> -	 * Replace this to mess with hardware state before we attach the
> -	 * trigger.
> -	 */
> -	.postenable = &iio_triggered_buffer_postenable,
> -	/*
> -	 * iio_triggered_buffer_predisable:
> -	 * Generic function that simple detaches the pollfunc from the trigger.
> -	 * Replace this to put hardware state back again after the trigger is
> -	 * detached but before userspace knows we have disabled the ring.
> -	 */
> -	.predisable = &iio_triggered_buffer_predisable,
>  };
>  
Hmm. Guess we should probably 'invent' a reason to illustrate the bufer
ops in the dummy example.  Anyone feeling creative?

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-31 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-25 11:38 [PATCH v2 1/3] iio: Move attach/detach of the poll func to the core Alexandru Ardelean
2020-05-25 11:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] iio: adc: at91-sama5d2_adc: remove predisable/postenable hooks Alexandru Ardelean
2020-05-25 11:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: remove iio_triggered_buffer_postenable()/iio_triggered_buffer_predisable() Alexandru Ardelean
2020-05-31 15:40   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2020-06-02  7:50     ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2020-06-02  8:54       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-06-17 13:37         ` Eugen.Hristev
2020-06-17 13:52           ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2020-06-18 13:01             ` Eugen.Hristev
2020-06-18 13:37               ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2020-06-20 16:40                 ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200531164020.765822dc@archlinux \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=alexandru.ardelean@analog.com \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=songqiang1304521@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).