linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Input: misc - atmel_captouch does not depend on OF
@ 2022-10-03 15:29 Jean Delvare
  2022-10-04  3:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2022-10-03 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dmitry Torokhov; +Cc: Daniel Hung-yu Wu, linux-input, LKML

The atmel_captouch driver does not actually depend on OF, it includes
a non-OF device ID which could be used to instantiate the device, and
the driver code is already prepared to be built with or without OF. So
drop the unneeded dependency.

Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: Daniel Hung-yu Wu <hywu@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
The problem I'm trying to solve here is that "depends on OF ||
COMPILE_TEST" does not make sense since OF can now be enabled on all
architectures. One way to fix this is by removing the dependency
altogether (this patch).

If the driver is known to be needed only on OF-enabled systems then we
could leave the dependency on OF and only drop COMPILE_TEST (and
simplify the driver code accordingly). I have an alternative patch
doing that already. Tell me what you prefer, I'm fine either way.

 drivers/input/misc/Kconfig |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-5.19.orig/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
+++ linux-5.19/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
@@ -107,7 +107,6 @@ config INPUT_ATC260X_ONKEY
 
 config INPUT_ATMEL_CAPTOUCH
 	tristate "Atmel Capacitive Touch Button Driver"
-	depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
 	depends on I2C
 	help
 	  Say Y here if an Atmel Capacitive Touch Button device which


-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Input: misc - atmel_captouch does not depend on OF
  2022-10-03 15:29 [PATCH] Input: misc - atmel_captouch does not depend on OF Jean Delvare
@ 2022-10-04  3:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
  2022-10-04  5:44   ` Jean Delvare
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2022-10-04  3:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jean Delvare; +Cc: Daniel Hung-yu Wu, linux-input, LKML

Hi Jean,

On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 05:29:53PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> The atmel_captouch driver does not actually depend on OF, it includes
> a non-OF device ID which could be used to instantiate the device, and
> the driver code is already prepared to be built with or without OF. So
> drop the unneeded dependency.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> Cc: Daniel Hung-yu Wu <hywu@google.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> ---
> The problem I'm trying to solve here is that "depends on OF ||
> COMPILE_TEST" does not make sense since OF can now be enabled on all
> architectures. One way to fix this is by removing the dependency
> altogether (this patch).
> 
> If the driver is known to be needed only on OF-enabled systems then we
> could leave the dependency on OF and only drop COMPILE_TEST (and
> simplify the driver code accordingly). I have an alternative patch
> doing that already. Tell me what you prefer, I'm fine either way.

The driver is not operable on systems without OF:

static int atmel_captouch_probe(...
	...

	node = dev->of_node;
	if (!node) {
		dev_err(dev, "failed to find matching node in device tree\n");
		return -EINVAL;
	}

	if (of_property_read_bool(node, "autorepeat"))

So the reason for "depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST" is to avoid prompting
users who actually try to configure real systems for drivers that make
no sense for them while still allowing people interested in compile
coverage to select COMPILE_TEST and enable more drivers.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Input: misc - atmel_captouch does not depend on OF
  2022-10-04  3:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2022-10-04  5:44   ` Jean Delvare
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2022-10-04  5:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dmitry Torokhov; +Cc: Daniel Hung-yu Wu, linux-input, LKML

On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 20:54:48 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Jean,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 05:29:53PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > The atmel_captouch driver does not actually depend on OF, it includes
> > a non-OF device ID which could be used to instantiate the device, and
> > the driver code is already prepared to be built with or without OF. So
> > drop the unneeded dependency.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> > Cc: Daniel Hung-yu Wu <hywu@google.com>
> > Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > The problem I'm trying to solve here is that "depends on OF ||
> > COMPILE_TEST" does not make sense since OF can now be enabled on all
> > architectures. One way to fix this is by removing the dependency
> > altogether (this patch).
> > 
> > If the driver is known to be needed only on OF-enabled systems then we
> > could leave the dependency on OF and only drop COMPILE_TEST (and
> > simplify the driver code accordingly). I have an alternative patch
> > doing that already. Tell me what you prefer, I'm fine either way.  
> 
> The driver is not operable on systems without OF:
> 
> static int atmel_captouch_probe(...
> 	...
> 
> 	node = dev->of_node;
> 	if (!node) {
> 		dev_err(dev, "failed to find matching node in device tree\n");
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 	}
> 
> 	if (of_property_read_bool(node, "autorepeat"))
> 
> So the reason for "depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST" is to avoid prompting
> users who actually try to configure real systems for drivers that make
> no sense for them while still allowing people interested in compile
> coverage to select COMPILE_TEST and enable more drivers.

OK, thanks for the clarification. Please disregard this patch then,
I'll send the other one.

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-10-04  5:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-10-03 15:29 [PATCH] Input: misc - atmel_captouch does not depend on OF Jean Delvare
2022-10-04  3:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2022-10-04  5:44   ` Jean Delvare

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).