From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
"Zhangfei Gao" <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
"Zhu, Tony" <tony.zhu@intel.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jean-Philippe Brucker" <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v10 04/12] iommu: Add attach/detach_dev_pasid iommu interface
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 02:56:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB52761058CFCB9397F6A73A958C999@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78376ca4-9b55-7609-abf1-27a1a376a8e0@linux.intel.com>
> From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2022 10:49 AM
>
> On 2022/7/28 19:59, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 03:06:47AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >
> >>> Then we don't need this weirdo check in the core iommu code at all.
> >>
> >> and then we could also move group->pasid_array to device->pasid_array
> >> with this approach. Though the end result doesn't change i.e. still only
> >> the singleton group can enable pasid the iommu core can just stick to
> >> the device manner now.
> >
> > I don't see why, the group is still logically the unit of attachment
> > in the iommu area, and if we have a multi-device group it just means
> > we iterate over all the devices in the group when doing pasid set, no
> > different than a RID.
>
> Okay. Based on the discussions in this thread, this patch will evolve to
> look like below. Any comments or concerns?
>
...
> +static bool iommu_group_device_pasid_viable(struct iommu_group *group,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + int count;
> +
> + count = iommu_group_device_count(group);
> + if (count != 1)
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * Block PASID attachment in cases where the PCI fabric is
> + * routing based on address. PCI/ACS disables that.
> + */
> + if (dev_is_pci(dev))
> + return pci_acs_path_enabled(to_pci_dev(dev), NULL,
> + REQ_ACS_FLAGS);
I think we are leaning toward doing above check in pci_enable_pasid().
Then no singleton check inside iommu core.
Presumably similar check can be done in DT/ACPI path of enabling pasid?
> +
> + /*
> + * Otherwise, the device came from DT/ACPI, assume it is static and
> + * then singleton can know from the device count in the group.
> + */
> + return true;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-29 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-05 5:06 [PATCH v10 00/12] iommu: SVA and IOPF refactoring Lu Baolu
2022-07-05 5:06 ` [PATCH v10 01/12] iommu: Add max_pasids field in struct iommu_device Lu Baolu
2022-07-23 13:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-31 11:54 ` Yi Liu
2022-07-31 13:33 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-05 5:07 ` [PATCH v10 02/12] iommu: Add max_pasids field in struct dev_iommu Lu Baolu
2022-07-23 14:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-31 11:55 ` Yi Liu
2022-07-05 5:07 ` [PATCH v10 03/12] iommu: Remove SVM_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE support Lu Baolu
2022-07-31 12:01 ` Yi Liu
2022-07-31 13:39 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-05 5:07 ` [PATCH v10 04/12] iommu: Add attach/detach_dev_pasid iommu interface Lu Baolu
2022-07-07 1:51 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-23 14:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-24 7:03 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-25 14:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-26 6:23 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-26 13:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-27 3:20 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-27 11:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-28 3:06 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-28 11:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-29 2:49 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-29 2:56 ` Tian, Kevin [this message]
2022-07-29 3:20 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-29 4:22 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-30 6:17 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-29 2:51 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-29 12:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-30 6:23 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-28 2:44 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-28 6:27 ` Baolu Lu
2022-08-02 2:19 ` Baolu Lu
2022-08-02 12:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-03 13:07 ` Baolu Lu
2022-08-03 19:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-04 2:03 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-08-04 2:42 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-24 7:23 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-24 8:39 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-24 9:13 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-25 7:46 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-25 10:11 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-31 12:10 ` Yi Liu
2022-07-05 5:07 ` [PATCH v10 05/12] iommu: Add IOMMU SVA domain support Lu Baolu
2022-07-07 1:52 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-07 3:01 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-23 14:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-31 12:19 ` Yi Liu
2022-07-05 5:07 ` [PATCH v10 06/12] iommu/vt-d: Add " Lu Baolu
2022-07-23 14:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-31 12:20 ` Yi Liu
2022-07-05 5:07 ` [PATCH v10 07/12] arm-smmu-v3/sva: " Lu Baolu
2022-07-23 14:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-24 11:58 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-05 5:07 ` [PATCH v10 08/12] iommu/sva: Refactoring iommu_sva_bind/unbind_device() Lu Baolu
2022-07-05 17:43 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-07-07 1:56 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-07 3:02 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-23 14:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-24 13:48 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-25 7:39 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-07-25 8:02 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-25 8:47 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-07-25 9:33 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-25 9:52 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-07-25 14:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-25 7:50 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-25 10:22 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-25 14:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-26 8:47 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-31 12:36 ` Yi Liu
2022-07-31 13:45 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-31 12:55 ` Yi Liu
2022-07-31 13:51 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-05 5:07 ` [PATCH v10 09/12] iommu: Remove SVA related callbacks from iommu ops Lu Baolu
2022-07-23 14:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-31 12:38 ` Yi Liu
2022-07-05 5:07 ` [PATCH v10 10/12] iommu: Prepare IOMMU domain for IOPF Lu Baolu
2022-07-07 1:58 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-23 14:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-24 14:04 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-25 14:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-31 12:50 ` Yi Liu
2022-07-31 13:47 ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-05 5:07 ` [PATCH v10 11/12] iommu: Per-domain I/O page fault handling Lu Baolu
2022-07-07 2:06 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-23 14:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-07-05 5:07 ` [PATCH v10 12/12] iommu: Rename iommu-sva-lib.{c,h} Lu Baolu
2022-07-23 14:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BN9PR11MB52761058CFCB9397F6A73A958C999@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tony.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).