IOMMU Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 03/21] x86/hpet: Calculate ticks-per-second in a separate function
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 01:13:45 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1906190111510.1765@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190618224800.GD30488@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com>

On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 05:54:05PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > 
> > So we already have ticks per second, aka frequency, right? So why do we
> > need yet another function instead of using the value which is computed
> > once? The frequency of the HPET channels has to be identical no matter
> > what. If it's not HPET is broken beyond repair.
> 
> I don't think it needs to be recomputed again. I missed the fact that
> the frequency was already computed here.
> 
> Also, the hpet char driver has its own frequency computation. Perhaps it
> could also obtain it from here, right?

No. It's separate on purpose. Hint: IA64, aka Itanic

Thanks,

	tglx
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply index

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-24  1:16 [RFC PATCH v4 00/21] Implement an HPET-based hardlockup detector Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/21] x86/msi: Add definition for NMI delivery mode Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/21] x86/hpet: Expose hpet_writel() in header Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/21] x86/hpet: Calculate ticks-per-second in a separate function Ricardo Neri
2019-06-14 15:54   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-14 15:59     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-18 22:48     ` Ricardo Neri
2019-06-18 23:13       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/21] x86/hpet: Add hpet_set_comparator() for periodic and one-shot modes Ricardo Neri
2019-06-14 18:17   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-18 22:48     ` Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/21] x86/hpet: Reserve timer for the HPET hardlockup detector Ricardo Neri
2019-06-11 19:54   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-14  1:14     ` Ricardo Neri
2019-06-14 16:10       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-18 22:48         ` Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/21] x86/hpet: Configure the timer used by the " Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/21] watchdog/hardlockup: Define a generic function to detect hardlockups Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/21] watchdog/hardlockup: Decouple the hardlockup detector from perf Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/21] x86/nmi: Add a NMI_WATCHDOG NMI handler category Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/21] watchdog/hardlockup: Add function to enable NMI watchdog on all allowed CPUs at once Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/21] x86/watchdog/hardlockup: Add an HPET-based hardlockup detector Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/21] watchdog/hardlockup/hpet: Adjust timer expiration on the number of monitored CPUs Ricardo Neri
2019-06-11 20:11   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-18 22:46     ` Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/21] x86/watchdog/hardlockup/hpet: Determine if HPET timer caused NMI Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/21] watchdog/hardlockup: Use parse_option_str() to handle "nmi_watchdog" Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/21] watchdog/hardlockup/hpet: Only enable the HPET watchdog via a boot parameter Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/21] x86/watchdog: Add a shim hardlockup detector Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/21] x86/tsc: Switch to perf-based hardlockup detector if TSC become unstable Ricardo Neri
2019-06-07  0:35   ` Stephane Eranian via iommu
2019-06-07 14:14     ` Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/21] x86/apic: Add a parameter for the APIC delivery mode Ricardo Neri
2019-06-16  9:55   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-18 22:47     ` Ricardo Neri
2019-06-18 23:15       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/21] iommu/vt-d: Rework prepare_irte() to support per-irq " Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 20/21] iommu/vt-d: hpet: Reserve an interrupt remampping table entry for watchdog Ricardo Neri
2019-06-16 18:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-16 19:21   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-17  8:25     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-17 21:38       ` Stephane Eranian via iommu
2019-06-17 23:08         ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-19 15:43           ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-21 15:33             ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-21 17:31               ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-21 18:39                 ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-21 20:05                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-21 23:55                     ` Ricardo Neri
2019-06-22  7:21                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-10-18  2:48           ` Ricardo Neri
2019-06-18 22:45       ` Ricardo Neri
2019-05-24  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 21/21] x86/watchdog/hardlockup/hpet: Support interrupt remapping Ricardo Neri
2019-06-16  8:44   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-16  8:53     ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1906190111510.1765@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

IOMMU Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/0 linux-iommu/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-iommu linux-iommu/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu \
		iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
	public-inbox-index linux-iommu

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.linux-foundation.lists.iommu


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git