iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
To: Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@chromium.org>, Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Cc: youlin.pei@mediatek.com,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@google.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com, anan.sun@mediatek.com,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 16/21] memory: mtk-smi: Add bus_sel for mt8183
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 13:38:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <effb4fff-da83-708f-ca10-50f2645c91c6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eee15db0-e43f-de9b-28a0-93bdd04836d7@gmail.com>

CCing Sascha

On 20/06/2019 11:35, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 13/06/2019 10:14, Pi-Hsun Shih wrote:
>> Hi,
>> When I tested this patch series (Based on linux 5.2.0-rc2, and with
>> various other patch series about MT8183) with lockdep enabled, and I'm
>> seeing the following lockdep warning on boot.
>>
>> By bisecting the commits, the first commit that introduce this warning
>> is this patch. The warning also doesn't appear if
>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1086582/ and
>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1086583/ are not applied.
>>
>> Do anyone have idea on why this is happening, or any suggestion on
>> which part I should be digging into to figure this out? Thanks.
>>
>> [    4.664194] ======================================================
>> [    4.670368] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
>> [    4.676545] 5.2.0-rc2-next-20190528-44527-g6c94b6475c04 #20 Tainted: G S
>> [    4.684539] ------------------------------------------------------
>> [    4.690714] kworker/4:1/51 is trying to acquire lock:
>> [    4.695760] (____ptrval____) (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.},
>> at:regulator_lock_dependent+0xdc/0x6c4
>> [    4.704732]
>> [    4.704732] but task is already holding lock:
>> [    4.710556] (____ptrval____) (&genpd->mlock/1){+.+.},
>> at:genpd_lock_nested_mtx+0x24/0x30
>> [    4.718740]
>> [    4.718740] which lock already depends on the new lock.
>> [    4.718740]
>> [    4.726908]
>> [    4.726908] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>> [    4.734382]
>> [    4.734382] -> #4 (&genpd->mlock/1){+.+.}:
>> [    4.739963]        __mutex_lock_common+0x1a0/0x1fe8
>> [    4.744836]        mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50
>> [    4.749275]        genpd_lock_nested_mtx+0x24/0x30
>> [    4.754063]        genpd_add_subdomain+0x150/0x524
>> [    4.758850]        pm_genpd_add_subdomain+0x3c/0x5c
>> [    4.763723]        scpsys_probe+0x520/0xe78
>> [    4.767902]        platform_drv_probe+0xf4/0x134
>> [    4.772517]        really_probe+0x214/0x4dc
>> [    4.776696]        driver_probe_device+0xcc/0x1d4
>> [    4.781396]        __device_attach_driver+0x10c/0x180
>> [    4.786442]        bus_for_each_drv+0x124/0x184
>> [    4.790968]        __device_attach+0x1c0/0x2d8
>> [    4.795407]        device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c
>> [    4.800106]        bus_probe_device+0x80/0x16c
>> [    4.804546]        deferred_probe_work_func+0x120/0x168
>> [    4.809767]        process_one_work+0x858/0x1208
>> [    4.814379]        worker_thread+0x9ec/0xcb8
>> [    4.818644]        kthread+0x2b8/0x2d0
>> [    4.822391]        ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>> [    4.826480]
>> [    4.826480] -> #3 (&genpd->mlock){+.+.}:
>> [    4.831880]        __mutex_lock_common+0x1a0/0x1fe8
>> [    4.836752]        mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50
>> [    4.841190]        genpd_lock_mtx+0x20/0x2c
>> [    4.845369]        genpd_runtime_resume+0x140/0x434
>> [    4.850241]        __rpm_callback+0xb0/0x1e4
>> [    4.854506]        rpm_callback+0x54/0x1a8
>> [    4.858597]        rpm_resume+0xc6c/0x10c4
>> [    4.862689]        __pm_runtime_resume+0xb4/0x124
>> [    4.867387]        device_link_add+0x598/0x8d0
> 
> For this looks as if you have also patch
> [PATCH v2 04/12] memory: mtk-smi: Add device-link between smi-larb and smi-common
> from series
> [PATCH v2 00/12] Clean up "mediatek,larb" after adding device_link
> applied.
> 

My guess is, that we run into this, because we call genpd_runtime_resume before
we have finished the subdomain registration in scpsys_probe.
That implies that you also have the scpsys series for mt8183 added to your tree.

Anyway it looks to me as if we have to add the subdomains before we call
of_genpd_add_provider_onecell().

Regards,
Matthias

> Regards,
> Matthias
> 
>> [    4.871829]        mtk_smi_larb_probe+0x2b0/0x340
>> [    4.876528]        platform_drv_probe+0xf4/0x134
>> [    4.881141]        really_probe+0x214/0x4dc
>> [    4.885320]        driver_probe_device+0xcc/0x1d4
>> [    4.890020]        __device_attach_driver+0x10c/0x180
>> [    4.895066]        bus_for_each_drv+0x124/0x184
>> [    4.899591]        __device_attach+0x1c0/0x2d8
>> [    4.904031]        device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c
>> [    4.908730]        bus_probe_device+0x80/0x16c
>> [    4.913169]        deferred_probe_work_func+0x120/0x168
>> [    4.918387]        process_one_work+0x858/0x1208
>> [    4.923000]        worker_thread+0x9ec/0xcb8
>> [    4.927264]        kthread+0x2b8/0x2d0
>> [    4.931009]        ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>> [    4.935098]
>> [    4.935098] -> #2 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}:
>> [    4.940412]        __mutex_lock_common+0x1a0/0x1fe8
>> [    4.945284]        mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50
>> [    4.949722]        device_pm_lock+0x1c/0x24
>> [    4.953900]        device_link_add+0x98/0x8d0
>> [    4.958252]        _regulator_get+0x3f0/0x504
>> [    4.962606]        _devm_regulator_get+0x58/0xb8
>> [    4.967218]        devm_regulator_get+0x28/0x34
>> [    4.971746]        pwm_backlight_probe+0x61c/0x1b90
>> [    4.976617]        platform_drv_probe+0xf4/0x134
>> [    4.981230]        really_probe+0x214/0x4dc
>> [    4.985409]        driver_probe_device+0xcc/0x1d4
>> [    4.990108]        device_driver_attach+0xe4/0x104
>> [    4.994894]        __driver_attach+0x134/0x14c
>> [    4.999333]        bus_for_each_dev+0x120/0x180
>> [    5.003859]        driver_attach+0x48/0x54
>> [    5.007950]        bus_add_driver+0x2ac/0x44c
>> [    5.012303]        driver_register+0x160/0x288
>> [    5.016742]        __platform_driver_register+0xcc/0xdc
>> [    5.021964]        pwm_backlight_driver_init+0x1c/0x24
>> [    5.027097]        do_one_initcall+0x38c/0x994
>> [    5.031536]        do_initcall_level+0x3a4/0x4b8
>> [    5.036148]        do_basic_setup+0x84/0xa0
>> [    5.036153]        kernel_init_freeable+0x23c/0x324
>> [    5.036158]        kernel_init+0x14/0x110
>> [    5.036164]        ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>> [    5.036166]
>> [    5.036166] -> #1 (device_links_lock){+.+.}:
>> [    5.065905]        __mutex_lock_common+0x1a0/0x1fe8
>> [    5.070777]        mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50
>> [    5.075215]        device_link_remove+0x40/0xe0
>> [    5.079740]        _regulator_put+0x104/0x2d8
>> [    5.084093]        regulator_put+0x30/0x44
>> [    5.088184]        devm_regulator_release+0x38/0x44
>> [    5.093056]        release_nodes+0x604/0x670
>> [    5.097320]        devres_release_all+0x70/0x8c
>> [    5.101846]        really_probe+0x270/0x4dc
>> [    5.106024]        driver_probe_device+0xcc/0x1d4
>> [    5.110724]        device_driver_attach+0xe4/0x104
>> [    5.115510]        __driver_attach+0x134/0x14c
>> [    5.119949]        bus_for_each_dev+0x120/0x180
>> [    5.124474]        driver_attach+0x48/0x54
>> [    5.128566]        bus_add_driver+0x2ac/0x44c
>> [    5.132919]        driver_register+0x160/0x288
>> [    5.137357]        __platform_driver_register+0xcc/0xdc
>> [    5.142576]        pwm_backlight_driver_init+0x1c/0x24
>> [    5.147708]        do_one_initcall+0x38c/0x994
>> [    5.152146]        do_initcall_level+0x3a4/0x4b8
>> [    5.156758]        do_basic_setup+0x84/0xa0
>> [    5.160936]        kernel_init_freeable+0x23c/0x324
>> [    5.165807]        kernel_init+0x14/0x110
>> [    5.169813]        ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>> [    5.173901]
>> [    5.173901] -> #0 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}:
>> [    5.179910]        lock_acquire+0x350/0x4d4
>> [    5.184088]        __mutex_lock_common+0x1a0/0x1fe8
>> [    5.184095]        mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50
>> [    5.197475]        regulator_lock_dependent+0xdc/0x6c4
>> [    5.197482]        regulator_disable+0xa0/0x138
>> [    5.197487]        scpsys_power_off+0x38c/0x4bc
>> [    5.197495]        genpd_power_off+0x3d8/0x6a0
>> [    5.209399]        genpd_power_off+0x530/0x6a0
>> [    5.209406]        genpd_power_off_work_fn+0x74/0xc0
>> [    5.209411]        process_one_work+0x858/0x1208
>> [    5.209419]        worker_thread+0x9ec/0xcb8
>> [    5.219067]        kthread+0x2b8/0x2d0
>> [    5.219073]        ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>> [    5.219077]
>> [    5.219077] other info that might help us debug this:
>> [    5.219077]
>> [    5.219080] Chain exists of:
>> [    5.219080]   regulator_list_mutex --> &genpd->mlock --> &genpd->mlock/1
>> [    5.219080]
>> [    5.228039]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>> [    5.228039]
>> [    5.228042]        CPU0                    CPU1
>> [    5.228046]        ----                    ----
>> [    5.228048]   lock(&genpd->mlock/1);
>> [    5.228058]                                lock(&genpd->mlock);
>> [    5.311647]                                lock(&genpd->mlock/1);
>> [    5.317736]   lock(regulator_list_mutex);
>> [    5.321742]
>> [    5.321742]  *** DEADLOCK ***
>> [    5.321742]
>> [    5.327655] 4 locks held by kworker/4:1/51:
>> [    5.331831]  #0: (____ptrval____) ((wq_completion)pm){+.+.},
>> at:process_one_work+0x57c/0x1208
>> [    5.340444]  #1: (____ptrval____)
>> ((work_completion)(&genpd->power_off_work)){+.+.},
>> at:process_one_work+0x5b8/0x1208
>> [    5.351139]  #2: (____ptrval____) (&genpd->mlock){+.+.},
>> at:genpd_lock_mtx+0x20/0x2c
>> [    5.358970]  #3: (____ptrval____) (&genpd->mlock/1){+.+.},
>> at:genpd_lock_nested_mtx+0x24/0x30
>> [    5.367584]
>> [    5.367584] stack backtrace:
>> [    5.371939] CPU: 4 PID: 51 Comm: kworker/4:1 Tainted: G S
>>  5.2.0-rc2-next-20190528-44527-g6c94b6475c04 #20
>> [    5.382809] Workqueue: pm genpd_power_off_work_fn
>> [    5.382816] Call trace:
>> [    5.382822]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x2c0
>> [    5.382830]  show_stack+0x20/0x2c
>> [    5.409174]  dump_stack+0x10c/0x17c
>> [    5.412659]  print_circular_bug+0x42c/0x4d0
>> [    5.416838]  __lock_acquire+0x4c88/0x5484
>> [    5.420843]  lock_acquire+0x350/0x4d4
>> [    5.424500]  __mutex_lock_common+0x1a0/0x1fe8
>> [    5.428851]  mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50
>> [    5.432770]  regulator_lock_dependent+0xdc/0x6c4
>> [    5.437383]  regulator_disable+0xa0/0x138
>> [    5.441389]  scpsys_power_off+0x38c/0x4bc
>> [    5.445393]  genpd_power_off+0x3d8/0x6a0
>> [    5.449310]  genpd_power_off+0x530/0x6a0
>> [    5.453229]  genpd_power_off_work_fn+0x74/0xc0
>> [    5.457667]  process_one_work+0x858/0x1208
>> [    5.461758]  worker_thread+0x9ec/0xcb8
>> [    5.465503]  kthread+0x2b8/0x2d0
>> [    5.468727]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:21 PM Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> wrote:
>>> ...
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:21 PM Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> wrote:
>>
>>> There are 2 mmu cells in a M4U HW. we could adjust some larbs entering
>>> mmu0 or mmu1 to balance the bandwidth via the smi-common register
>>> SMI_BUS_SEL(0x220)(Each larb occupy 2 bits).
>>>
>>> In mt8183, For better performance, we switch larb1/2/5/7 to enter
>>> mmu1 while the others still keep enter mmu0.
>>>
>>> In mt8173 and mt2712, we don't get the performance issue,
>>> Keep its default value(0x0), that means all the larbs enter mmu0.
>>>
>>> Note: smi gen1(mt2701/mt7623) don't have this bus_sel.
>>>
>>> And, the base of smi-common is completely different with smi_ao_base
>>> of gen1, thus I add new variable for that.
>>>
>>> CC: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
>>> index 9790801..08cf40d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
>>> @@ -49,6 +49,12 @@
>>>  #define SMI_LARB_NONSEC_CON(id)        (0x380 + ((id) * 4))
>>>  #define F_MMU_EN               BIT(0)
>>>
>>> +/* SMI COMMON */
>>> +#define SMI_BUS_SEL                    0x220
>>> +#define SMI_BUS_LARB_SHIFT(larbid)     ((larbid) << 1)
>>> +/* All are MMU0 defaultly. Only specialize mmu1 here. */
>>> +#define F_MMU1_LARB(larbid)            (0x1 << SMI_BUS_LARB_SHIFT(larbid))
>>> +
>>>  enum mtk_smi_gen {
>>>         MTK_SMI_GEN1,
>>>         MTK_SMI_GEN2
>>> @@ -57,6 +63,7 @@ enum mtk_smi_gen {
>>>  struct mtk_smi_common_plat {
>>>         enum mtk_smi_gen gen;
>>>         bool             has_gals;
>>> +       u32              bus_sel; /* Balance some larbs to enter mmu0 or
>>> mmu1 */
>>>  };
>>>
>>>  struct mtk_smi_larb_gen {
>>> @@ -72,8 +79,8 @@ struct mtk_smi {
>>>         struct clk                      *clk_apb, *clk_smi;
>>>         struct clk                      *clk_gals0, *clk_gals1;
>>>         struct clk                      *clk_async; /*only needed by
>>> mt2701*/
>>> -       void __iomem                    *smi_ao_base;
>>> -
>>> +       void __iomem                    *smi_ao_base; /* only for gen1 */
>>> +       void __iomem                    *base;        /* only for gen2 */
>>>         const struct mtk_smi_common_plat *plat;
>>>  };
>>>
>>> @@ -410,6 +417,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_smi_larb_suspend(struct
>>> device *dev)
>>>  static const struct mtk_smi_common_plat mtk_smi_common_mt8183 = {
>>>         .gen      = MTK_SMI_GEN2,
>>>         .has_gals = true,
>>> +       .bus_sel  = F_MMU1_LARB(1) | F_MMU1_LARB(2) | F_MMU1_LARB(5) |
>>> +                   F_MMU1_LARB(7),
>>>  };
>>>
>>>  static const struct of_device_id mtk_smi_common_of_ids[] = {
>>> @@ -482,6 +491,11 @@ static int mtk_smi_common_probe(struct
>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>                 ret = clk_prepare_enable(common->clk_async);
>>>                 if (ret)
>>>                         return ret;
>>> +       } else {
>>> +               res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>> +               common->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>>> +               if (IS_ERR(common->base))
>>> +                       return PTR_ERR(common->base);
>>>         }
>>>         pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>>>         platform_set_drvdata(pdev, common);
>>> @@ -497,6 +511,7 @@ static int mtk_smi_common_remove(struct
>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>  static int __maybe_unused mtk_smi_common_resume(struct device *dev)
>>>  {
>>>         struct mtk_smi *common = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>> +       u32 bus_sel = common->plat->bus_sel;
>>>         int ret;
>>>
>>>         ret = mtk_smi_clk_enable(common);
>>> @@ -504,6 +519,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_smi_common_resume(struct
>>> device *dev)
>>>                 dev_err(common->dev, "Failed to enable clock(%d).\n", ret);
>>>                 return ret;
>>>         }
>>> +
>>> +       if (common->plat->gen == MTK_SMI_GEN2 && bus_sel)
>>> +               writel(bus_sel, common->base + SMI_BUS_SEL);
>>>         return 0;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> --
>>> 1.9.1
>>>
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-20 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-10 12:17 [PATCH v7 00/21] MT8183 IOMMU SUPPORT Yong Wu
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 01/21] dt-bindings: mediatek: Add binding for mt8183 IOMMU and SMI Yong Wu
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 02/21] iommu/mediatek: Use a struct as the platform data Yong Wu
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 03/21] memory: mtk-smi: Use a general config_port interface Yong Wu
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 04/21] memory: mtk-smi: Use a struct for the platform data for smi-common Yong Wu
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 05/21] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Add paddr_to_iopte and iopte_to_paddr helpers Yong Wu
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 06/21] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Extend MediaTek 4GB Mode Yong Wu
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 07/21] iommu/mediatek: Add bclk can be supported optionally Yong Wu
2019-06-15 19:18   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 08/21] iommu/mediatek: Add larb-id remapped support Yong Wu
2019-06-17  9:25   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 09/21] iommu/mediatek: Refine protect memory definition Yong Wu
2019-06-17  9:59   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 10/21] iommu/mediatek: Move reset_axi into plat_data Yong Wu
2019-06-17 10:19   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 11/21] iommu/mediatek: Move vld_pa_rng " Yong Wu
2019-06-17 10:27   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 12/21] memory: mtk-smi: Add gals support Yong Wu
2019-06-17 15:43   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 13/21] iommu/mediatek: Add mt8183 IOMMU support Yong Wu
2019-06-17 15:51   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 14/21] iommu/mediatek: Add mmu1 support Yong Wu
2019-06-17 15:58   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-18  6:19   ` Tomasz Figa via iommu
2019-06-18 12:09     ` Yong Wu
2019-06-18 14:05       ` Tomasz Figa via iommu
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 15/21] memory: mtk-smi: Invoke pm runtime_callback to enable clocks Yong Wu
2019-06-17 16:13   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 16/21] memory: mtk-smi: Add bus_sel for mt8183 Yong Wu
2019-06-13  8:14   ` Pi-Hsun Shih
2019-06-20  9:35     ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-20 11:38       ` Matthias Brugger [this message]
2019-06-21  3:57         ` Pi-Hsun Shih
2019-06-13  8:20   ` Pi-Hsun Shih
2019-06-17 16:28     ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-17 16:23   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-18 12:10     ` Yong Wu
2019-06-18 21:07       ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 17/21] memory: mtk-smi: Get rid of need_larbid Yong Wu
2019-06-18 13:45   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-20 13:59     ` Yong Wu
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 18/21] iommu/mediatek: Fix VLD_PA_RNG register backup when suspend Yong Wu
2019-06-17 16:30   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 19/21] iommu/mediatek: Rename enable_4GB to dram_is_4gb Yong Wu
2019-06-18 16:06   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-20 13:59     ` Yong Wu
2019-06-21 10:10       ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-22  2:42         ` Yong Wu
2019-06-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 20/21] iommu/mediatek: Fix iova_to_phys PA start for 4GB mode Yong Wu
2019-06-18 16:35   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-06-20 14:00     ` Yong Wu
2019-06-10 12:18 ` [PATCH v7 21/21] iommu/mediatek: Switch to SPDX license identifier Yong Wu
2019-06-17 16:33   ` Matthias Brugger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=effb4fff-da83-708f-ca10-50f2645c91c6@gmail.com \
    --to=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=anan.sun@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=pihsun@chromium.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=tfiga@google.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).