linux-kernel-mentees.lists.linuxfoundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v2] fs: gfs2: add validation checks for size of superblock
@ 2020-10-14 16:31 Anant Thazhemadam
  2020-10-14 19:00 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Anant Thazhemadam @ 2020-10-14 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: anprice, agruenba, rpeterso
  Cc: anant.thazhemadam, syzbot+af90d47a37376844e731, foxhlchen,
	linux-kernel, syzbot+a5e2482a693e6b1e444b, cluster-devel,
	linux-kernel-mentees

In gfs2_check_sb(), no validation checks are performed with regards to
the size of the superblock.
syzkaller detected a slab-out-of-bounds bug that was primarily caused
because the block size for a superblock was set to zero.
A valid size for a superblock is a power of 2 between 512 and PAGE_SIZE.
Performing validation checks and ensuring that the size of the superblock
is valid fixes this bug.

Reported-by: syzbot+af90d47a37376844e731@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+af90d47a37376844e731@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Suggested-by: Andrew Price <anprice@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anant Thazhemadam <anant.thazhemadam@gmail.com>
---

Changes in v2:

	* Completely dropped the changes proposed in v1. Instead,
	  validity checks for superblock size have been introduced. 
	  (Suggested by Andrew Price<anprice@redhat.com>)

	* Addded a "Suggested-by" tag accrediting the patch idea to
	  Andrew. If there's any issue with that, please let me know.

	* Changed the commit header and commit message appropriately.

	* Updated "Reported-by" and "Tested-by" tags to the same instance
	  of the bug that was detected earlier (non consequential change).


 fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
index 6d18d2c91add..f0605fae2c4c 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
@@ -169,6 +169,13 @@ static int gfs2_check_sb(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, int silent)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	/* Check if the size of the block is valid - a power of 2 between 512 and  PAGE_SIZE */
+	if (sb->sb_bsize < 512 || sb->sb_bsize > PAGE_SIZE || (sb->sb_bsize & (sb->sb_bsize - 1))) {
+		if (!silent)
+			pr_warn("Invalid superblock size\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	/*  If format numbers match exactly, we're done.  */
 
 	if (sb->sb_fs_format == GFS2_FORMAT_FS &&
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v2] fs: gfs2: add validation checks for size of superblock
  2020-10-14 16:31 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v2] fs: gfs2: add validation checks for size of superblock Anant Thazhemadam
@ 2020-10-14 19:00 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Gruenbacher @ 2020-10-14 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anant Thazhemadam
  Cc: syzbot+af90d47a37376844e731, Fox Chen, LKML,
	syzbot+a5e2482a693e6b1e444b, cluster-devel, Andrew Price,
	Bob Peterson, linux-kernel-mentees

Anant,

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 6:31 PM Anant Thazhemadam
<anant.thazhemadam@gmail.com> wrote:
> In gfs2_check_sb(), no validation checks are performed with regards to
> the size of the superblock.
> syzkaller detected a slab-out-of-bounds bug that was primarily caused
> because the block size for a superblock was set to zero.
> A valid size for a superblock is a power of 2 between 512 and PAGE_SIZE.
> Performing validation checks and ensuring that the size of the superblock
> is valid fixes this bug.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+af90d47a37376844e731@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Tested-by: syzbot+af90d47a37376844e731@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Suggested-by: Andrew Price <anprice@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anant Thazhemadam <anant.thazhemadam@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
>
>         * Completely dropped the changes proposed in v1. Instead,
>           validity checks for superblock size have been introduced.
>           (Suggested by Andrew Price<anprice@redhat.com>)
>
>         * Addded a "Suggested-by" tag accrediting the patch idea to
>           Andrew. If there's any issue with that, please let me know.
>
>         * Changed the commit header and commit message appropriately.
>
>         * Updated "Reported-by" and "Tested-by" tags to the same instance
>           of the bug that was detected earlier (non consequential change).
>
>
>  fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
> index 6d18d2c91add..f0605fae2c4c 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
> @@ -169,6 +169,13 @@ static int gfs2_check_sb(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, int silent)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         }
>
> +       /* Check if the size of the block is valid - a power of 2 between 512 and  PAGE_SIZE */
> +       if (sb->sb_bsize < 512 || sb->sb_bsize > PAGE_SIZE || (sb->sb_bsize & (sb->sb_bsize - 1))) {
> +               if (!silent)
> +                       pr_warn("Invalid superblock size\n");
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }
> +

I'll add that to for-next.

Thanks,
Andreas

_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-14 19:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-14 16:31 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v2] fs: gfs2: add validation checks for size of superblock Anant Thazhemadam
2020-10-14 19:00 ` Andreas Gruenbacher

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).