linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/10] device property: Remove some casts in property-entry-test
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 12:31:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210513193204.816681-4-davidgow@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210513193204.816681-1-davidgow@google.com>

With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros
removed, several casts in property-entry-test are no longer required.

Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.

Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---

This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the
first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from
the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you
particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.

 drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c | 56 ++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c b/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c
index 1106fedcceed..6071d5bc128c 100644
--- a/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c
+++ b/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c
@@ -32,11 +32,11 @@ static void pe_test_uints(struct kunit *test)
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u8(node, "prop-u8", &val_u8);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u8, 8);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u8, 8);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(node, "prop-u8", array_u8, 1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u8[0], 8);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u8[0], 8);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(node, "prop-u8", array_u8, 2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
@@ -49,14 +49,14 @@ static void pe_test_uints(struct kunit *test)
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u16(node, "prop-u16", &val_u16);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u16, 16);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u16, 16);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_count_u16(node, "prop-u16");
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 1);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(node, "prop-u16", array_u16, 1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u16[0], 16);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u16[0], 16);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(node, "prop-u16", array_u16, 2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
@@ -69,14 +69,14 @@ static void pe_test_uints(struct kunit *test)
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u32(node, "prop-u32", &val_u32);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u32, 32);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u32, 32);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_count_u32(node, "prop-u32");
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 1);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "prop-u32", array_u32, 1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u32[0], 32);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u32[0], 32);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "prop-u32", array_u32, 2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
@@ -89,14 +89,14 @@ static void pe_test_uints(struct kunit *test)
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u64(node, "prop-u64", &val_u64);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u64, 64);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u64, 64);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_count_u64(node, "prop-u64");
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 1);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "prop-u64", array_u64, 1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u64[0], 64);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u64[0], 64);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "prop-u64", array_u64, 2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
@@ -140,19 +140,19 @@ static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u8(node, "prop-u8", &val_u8);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u8, 8);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u8, 8);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_count_u8(node, "prop-u8");
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 10);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(node, "prop-u8", array_u8, 1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u8[0], 8);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u8[0], 8);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(node, "prop-u8", array_u8, 2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u8[0], 8);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u8[1], 9);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u8[0], 8);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u8[1], 9);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(node, "prop-u8", array_u8, 17);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
@@ -165,19 +165,19 @@ static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u16(node, "prop-u16", &val_u16);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u16, 16);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u16, 16);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_count_u16(node, "prop-u16");
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 10);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(node, "prop-u16", array_u16, 1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u16[0], 16);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u16[0], 16);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(node, "prop-u16", array_u16, 2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u16[0], 16);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u16[1], 17);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u16[0], 16);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u16[1], 17);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(node, "prop-u16", array_u16, 17);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
@@ -190,19 +190,19 @@ static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u32(node, "prop-u32", &val_u32);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u32, 32);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u32, 32);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_count_u32(node, "prop-u32");
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 10);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "prop-u32", array_u32, 1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u32[0], 32);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u32[0], 32);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "prop-u32", array_u32, 2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u32[0], 32);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u32[1], 33);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u32[0], 32);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u32[1], 33);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "prop-u32", array_u32, 17);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
@@ -215,19 +215,19 @@ static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u64(node, "prop-u64", &val_u64);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u64, 64);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u64, 64);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_count_u64(node, "prop-u64");
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 10);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "prop-u64", array_u64, 1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u64[0], 64);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u64[0], 64);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "prop-u64", array_u64, 2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u64[0], 64);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u64[1], 65);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u64[0], 64);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u64[1], 65);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "prop-u64", array_u64, 17);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
@@ -358,13 +358,13 @@ static void pe_test_move_inline_u8(struct kunit *test)
 
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, copy[0].is_inline);
 	data_ptr = (u8 *)&copy[0].value;
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)data_ptr[0], 1);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)data_ptr[1], 2);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data_ptr[0], 1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data_ptr[1], 2);
 
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, copy[1].is_inline);
 	data_ptr = copy[1].pointer;
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)data_ptr[0], 5);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)data_ptr[1], 6);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data_ptr[0], 5);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data_ptr[1], 6);
 
 	property_entries_free(copy);
 }
-- 
2.31.1.751.gd2f1c929bd-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-13 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-13 19:31 [PATCH v2 01/10] kunit: Do not typecheck binary assertions David Gow
2021-05-13 19:31 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] kunit: Assign strings to 'const char*' in STREQ assertions David Gow
2021-05-13 19:31 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] Documentation: kunit: Clean up some string casts in examples David Gow
2021-05-13 23:07   ` Daniel Latypov
2021-06-15 20:10   ` Brendan Higgins
2021-05-13 19:31 ` David Gow [this message]
2021-05-13 19:42   ` [PATCH v2 04/10] device property: Remove some casts in property-entry-test Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-15 20:12   ` Brendan Higgins
2021-05-13 19:31 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] iio: Remove a cast in iio-test-format which is no longer required David Gow
2021-06-15 20:14   ` Brendan Higgins
2021-06-16 14:08     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-05-13 19:32 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed: Remove some unnecessary casts from KUnit tests David Gow
2021-05-14  1:55   ` Andrew Jeffery
2021-05-17  9:22   ` Ulf Hansson
2021-05-18  4:29     ` David Gow
2021-06-15 20:16   ` Brendan Higgins
2021-05-13 19:32 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] thunderbolt: test: Remove sone casts which are no longer required David Gow
2021-05-14  6:06   ` Mika Westerberg
2021-05-14  7:27     ` David Gow
2021-05-14 19:57       ` Shuah Khan
2021-06-15 20:31   ` Brendan Higgins
2021-05-13 19:32 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] kernel/sysctl-test: Remove some casts which are no-longer required David Gow
2021-06-15 20:33   ` Brendan Higgins
2021-05-13 19:32 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] apparmor: test: " David Gow
2021-06-15 20:40   ` Brendan Higgins
2021-06-15 21:26   ` John Johansen
2021-05-13 19:32 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] lib/cmdline_kunit: Remove a cast " David Gow
2021-05-17  6:52   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-15 20:42   ` Brendan Higgins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210513193204.816681-4-davidgow@google.com \
    --to=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).