From: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/10] kernel/sysctl-test: Remove some casts which are no-longer required
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 12:32:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210513193204.816681-8-davidgow@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210513193204.816681-1-davidgow@google.com>
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros
removed, several casts in sysctl-test are no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---
This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the
first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from
the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you
particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
kernel/sysctl-test.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl-test.c b/kernel/sysctl-test.c
index ccb78509f1a8..664ded05dd7a 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl-test.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl-test.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_null_tbl_data(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&null_data_table,
KUNIT_PROC_READ, buffer, &len,
&pos));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
/*
* See above.
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_null_tbl_data(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&null_data_table,
KUNIT_PROC_WRITE, buffer, &len,
&pos));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
}
/*
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_maxlen_unset(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&data_maxlen_unset_table,
KUNIT_PROC_READ, buffer, &len,
&pos));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
/*
* See previous comment.
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_maxlen_unset(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&data_maxlen_unset_table,
KUNIT_PROC_WRITE, buffer, &len,
&pos));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
}
/*
@@ -135,11 +135,11 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_len_is_zero(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_READ, buffer,
&len, &pos));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_WRITE, buffer,
&len, &pos));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
}
/*
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_read_but_position_set(
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_READ, buffer,
&len, &pos));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
}
/*
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_read_happy_single_positive(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_READ,
user_buffer, &len, &pos));
- KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, (size_t)3, len);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 3, len);
buffer[len] = '\0';
/* And we read 13 back out. */
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "13\n", buffer);
@@ -233,9 +233,9 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_read_happy_single_negative(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_READ,
user_buffer, &len, &pos));
- KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, (size_t)4, len);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 4, len);
buffer[len] = '\0';
- KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "-16\n", (char *)buffer);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "-16\n", buffer);
}
/*
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_write_happy_single_positive(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_WRITE,
user_buffer, &len, &pos));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, len);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, (size_t)pos);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, pos);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 9, *((int *)table.data));
}
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_write_happy_single_negative(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_WRITE,
user_buffer, &len, &pos));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, len);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, (size_t)pos);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, pos);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -9, *((int *)table.data));
}
--
2.31.1.751.gd2f1c929bd-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-13 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-13 19:31 [PATCH v2 01/10] kunit: Do not typecheck binary assertions David Gow
2021-05-13 19:31 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] kunit: Assign strings to 'const char*' in STREQ assertions David Gow
2021-05-13 19:31 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] Documentation: kunit: Clean up some string casts in examples David Gow
2021-05-13 23:07 ` Daniel Latypov
2021-06-15 20:10 ` Brendan Higgins
2021-05-13 19:31 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] device property: Remove some casts in property-entry-test David Gow
2021-05-13 19:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-15 20:12 ` Brendan Higgins
2021-05-13 19:31 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] iio: Remove a cast in iio-test-format which is no longer required David Gow
2021-06-15 20:14 ` Brendan Higgins
2021-06-16 14:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-05-13 19:32 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed: Remove some unnecessary casts from KUnit tests David Gow
2021-05-14 1:55 ` Andrew Jeffery
2021-05-17 9:22 ` Ulf Hansson
2021-05-18 4:29 ` David Gow
2021-06-15 20:16 ` Brendan Higgins
2021-05-13 19:32 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] thunderbolt: test: Remove sone casts which are no longer required David Gow
2021-05-14 6:06 ` Mika Westerberg
2021-05-14 7:27 ` David Gow
2021-05-14 19:57 ` Shuah Khan
2021-06-15 20:31 ` Brendan Higgins
2021-05-13 19:32 ` David Gow [this message]
2021-06-15 20:33 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] kernel/sysctl-test: Remove some casts which are no-longer required Brendan Higgins
2021-05-13 19:32 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] apparmor: test: " David Gow
2021-06-15 20:40 ` Brendan Higgins
2021-06-15 21:26 ` John Johansen
2021-05-13 19:32 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] lib/cmdline_kunit: Remove a cast " David Gow
2021-05-17 6:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-15 20:42 ` Brendan Higgins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210513193204.816681-8-davidgow@google.com \
--to=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=yzaikin@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).