From: "Konstantin Ryabitsev via RT" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com Subject: [Kernel.org Helpdesk #80110] Bugzilla Component for KUnit? Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 14:55:48 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <rt-4.4.0-12639-1570215347-1334.80110-6-0@linuxfoundation> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20191002215351.GA177672@google.com> On 2019-10-02 17:53:58, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > Hi, > > I am thinking about requesting a Bugzilla component for my kernel > project KUnit. I am not sure if this is the right place for it. Some > background on KUnit: We are working on adding unit testing for the > Linux > kernel. We have our initial patchset that introduces the > subsystem > in the process of being merged (Linus sent our PR back to us for a > minor > fix, so it should be in either 5.4-rc2 or 5.5, but is nevertheless > in > linux-next). However, we also have a staging repo that people are > using > and some supporting code that lives outside of the kernel. > > So I am trying to figure out: > > 1. Is it appropriate to request a Bugzilla component before our > subsystem has been merged into torvalds/master? I would just wait, > but I have some users looking to file issues, so I would prefer to > provide them something sooner rather than later. > > 2. Is it appropriate to use the kernel's Bugzilla to track issues > outside of the Linux kernel? As I mention above, we have code that > lives outside of the kernel; is it appropriate to use kernel.org's > Bugzilla for this? > > 3. Does Bugzilla match my planned usage model? It doesn't look like > Bugzilla get's much usage aside from reporting bugs. I want to use > it for tracking feature progress and things like that. Is that > okay? Yes, we can certainly host this on bugzilla.kernel.org. Would you be okay with Tools/KUnit as product/category? Regards, -- Konstantin Ryabitsev Director, LF Projects IT The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-04 19:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <RT-Ticket-80110@linuxfoundation> 2019-10-02 21:53 ` Brendan Higgins 2019-10-04 18:55 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev via RT [this message] 2019-10-07 21:21 ` [Kernel.org Helpdesk #80110] " Brendan Higgins 2019-10-07 21:21 ` email@example.com via RT 2019-10-15 2:41 ` Brendan Higgins 2019-10-15 2:42 ` firstname.lastname@example.org via RT [not found] ` <rt-4.4.0-14627-1570483310-1693.80110-6-0@linuxfoundation> 2019-10-15 20:14 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev via RT 2019-10-16 21:05 ` Brendan Higgins 2019-10-16 21:05 ` email@example.com via RT
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=rt-4.4.0-12639-1570215347-1334.80110-6-0@linuxfoundation \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --subject='Re: [Kernel.org Helpdesk #80110] Bugzilla Component for KUnit?' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).