From: "Konstantin Ryabitsev via RT" <kernel-helpdesk@rt.linuxfoundation.org>
To: brendanhiggins@google.com
Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Kernel.org Helpdesk #80110] Bugzilla Component for KUnit?
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 14:55:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.0-12639-1570215347-1334.80110-6-0@linuxfoundation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191002215351.GA177672@google.com>
On 2019-10-02 17:53:58, brendanhiggins@google.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am thinking about requesting a Bugzilla component for my kernel
> project KUnit. I am not sure if this is the right place for it. Some
> background on KUnit: We are working on adding unit testing for the
> Linux
> kernel[1][2]. We have our initial patchset that introduces the
> subsystem
> in the process of being merged (Linus sent our PR back to us for a
> minor
> fix[3], so it should be in either 5.4-rc2 or 5.5, but is nevertheless
> in
> linux-next). However, we also have a staging repo that people are
> using
> and some supporting code that lives outside of the kernel.
>
> So I am trying to figure out:
>
> 1. Is it appropriate to request a Bugzilla component before our
> subsystem has been merged into torvalds/master? I would just wait,
> but I have some users looking to file issues, so I would prefer to
> provide them something sooner rather than later.
>
> 2. Is it appropriate to use the kernel's Bugzilla to track issues
> outside of the Linux kernel? As I mention above, we have code that
> lives outside of the kernel; is it appropriate to use kernel.org's
> Bugzilla for this?
>
> 3. Does Bugzilla match my planned usage model? It doesn't look like
> Bugzilla get's much usage aside from reporting bugs. I want to use
> it for tracking feature progress and things like that. Is that
> okay?
Yes, we can certainly host this on bugzilla.kernel.org. Would you be okay with Tools/KUnit as product/category?
Regards,
--
Konstantin Ryabitsev
Director, LF Projects IT
The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-04 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <RT-Ticket-80110@linuxfoundation>
2019-10-02 21:53 ` Bugzilla Component for KUnit? Brendan Higgins
2019-10-04 18:55 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev via RT [this message]
2019-10-07 21:21 ` [Kernel.org Helpdesk #80110] " Brendan Higgins
2019-10-07 21:21 ` brendanhiggins@google.com via RT
2019-10-15 2:41 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-10-15 2:42 ` brendanhiggins@google.com via RT
[not found] ` <rt-4.4.0-14627-1570483310-1693.80110-6-0@linuxfoundation>
2019-10-15 20:14 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev via RT
2019-10-16 21:05 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-10-16 21:05 ` brendanhiggins@google.com via RT
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=rt-4.4.0-12639-1570215347-1334.80110-6-0@linuxfoundation \
--to=kernel-helpdesk@rt.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).