linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v3 17/17] mm, vmscan: make compaction_ready() more accurate and readable
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 11:54:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160624095437.16385-18-vbabka@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160624095437.16385-1-vbabka@suse.cz>

The compaction_ready() is used during direct reclaim for costly order
allocations to skip reclaim for zones where compaction should be attempted
instead. It's combining the standard compaction_suitable() check with its own
watermark check based on high watermark with extra gap, and the result is
confusing at best.

This patch attempts to better structure and document the checks involved.
First, compaction_suitable() can determine that the allocation should either
succeed already, or that compaction doesn't have enough free pages to proceed.
The third possibility is that compaction has enough free pages, but we still
decide to reclaim first - unless we are already above the high watermark with
gap.  This does not mean that the reclaim will actually reach this watermark
during single attempt, this is rather an over-reclaim protection. So document
the code as such. The check for compaction_deferred() is removed completely, as
it in fact had no proper role here.

The result after this patch is mainly a less confusing code. We also skip some
over-reclaim in cases where the allocation should already succed.

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 484ff05d5a8f..724131661f0c 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2462,40 +2462,37 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
 }
 
 /*
- * Returns true if compaction should go ahead for a high-order request, or
- * the high-order allocation would succeed without compaction.
+ * Returns true if compaction should go ahead for a costly-order request, or
+ * the allocation would already succeed without compaction. Return false if we
+ * should reclaim first.
  */
 static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, int order, int classzone_idx)
 {
 	unsigned long balance_gap, watermark;
-	bool watermark_ok;
+	enum compact_result suitable;
+
+	suitable = compaction_suitable(zone, order, 0, classzone_idx);
+	if (suitable == COMPACT_PARTIAL)
+		/* Allocation should succeed already. Don't reclaim. */
+		return true;
+	if (suitable == COMPACT_SKIPPED)
+		/* Compaction cannot yet proceed. Do reclaim. */
+		return false;
 
 	/*
-	 * Compaction takes time to run and there are potentially other
-	 * callers using the pages just freed. Continue reclaiming until
-	 * there is a buffer of free pages available to give compaction
-	 * a reasonable chance of completing and allocating the page
+	 * Compaction is already possible, but it takes time to run and there
+	 * are potentially other callers using the pages just freed. So proceed
+	 * with reclaim to make a buffer of free pages available to give
+	 * compaction a reasonable chance of completing and allocating the page.
+	 * Note that we won't actually reclaim the whole buffer in one attempt
+	 * as the target watermark in should_continue_reclaim() is lower. But if
+	 * we are already above the high+gap watermark, don't reclaim at all.
 	 */
 	balance_gap = min(low_wmark_pages(zone), DIV_ROUND_UP(
 			zone->managed_pages, KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO));
 	watermark = high_wmark_pages(zone) + balance_gap + compact_gap(order);
-	watermark_ok = zone_watermark_ok_safe(zone, 0, watermark, classzone_idx);
-
-	/*
-	 * If compaction is deferred, reclaim up to a point where
-	 * compaction will have a chance of success when re-enabled
-	 */
-	if (compaction_deferred(zone, order))
-		return watermark_ok;
-
-	/*
-	 * If compaction is not ready to start and allocation is not likely
-	 * to succeed without it, then keep reclaiming.
-	 */
-	if (compaction_suitable(zone, order, 0, classzone_idx) == COMPACT_SKIPPED)
-		return false;
 
-	return watermark_ok;
+	return zone_watermark_ok_safe(zone, 0, watermark, classzone_idx);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.8.4

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-24 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-24  9:54 [PATCH v3 00/17] make direct compaction more deterministic Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-24  9:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] mm, compaction: don't isolate PageWriteback pages in MIGRATE_SYNC_LIGHT mode Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-24  9:54 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] mm, page_alloc: set alloc_flags only once in slowpath Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-30 14:44   ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-24  9:54 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] mm, page_alloc: don't retry initial attempt " Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-30 15:03   ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-24  9:54 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] mm, page_alloc: restructure direct compaction handling " Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-24  9:54 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] mm, page_alloc: make THP-specific decisions more generic Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-24  9:54 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] mm, thp: remove __GFP_NORETRY from khugepaged and madvised allocations Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-24  9:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] mm, compaction: introduce direct compaction priority Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-24 11:39   ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-24 11:51     ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-24  9:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] mm, compaction: simplify contended compaction handling Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-24  9:54 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] mm, compaction: make whole_zone flag ignore cached scanner positions Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-06  5:09   ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-18  9:12     ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-19  6:44       ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-19  6:54         ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-24  9:54 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] mm, compaction: cleanup unused functions Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-24 11:53   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-24  9:54 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] mm, compaction: add the ultimate direct compaction priority Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-24  9:54 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] mm, compaction: more reliably increase " Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-06  5:39   ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-15 13:37     ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-18  4:41       ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-18 12:21         ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-19  4:53           ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-19  7:42             ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-24  9:54 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] mm, compaction: use correct watermark when checking allocation success Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-06  5:47   ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-18  9:23     ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-24  9:54 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] mm, compaction: create compact_gap wrapper Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-24  9:54 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] mm, compaction: use proper alloc_flags in __compaction_suitable() Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-24  9:54 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] mm, compaction: require only min watermarks for non-costly orders Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-24  9:54 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2016-07-06  5:55   ` [PATCH v3 17/17] mm, vmscan: make compaction_ready() more accurate and readable Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-18 11:48     ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160624095437.16385-18-vbabka@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).