From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memblock: replace u64 with phys_addr_t where appropriate
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 16:54:49 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180704075449.GB458@jagdpanzerIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180704070305.GB4352@rapoport-lnx>
On (07/04/18 10:03), Mike Rapoport wrote:
> arch/alpha/kernel/pci_iommu.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> arch/arm/mm/alignment.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/nwfpe/fpmodule.c | 2 +-
> arch/microblaze/mm/pgtable.c | 2 +-
> arch/sparc/kernel/ds.c | 2 +-
> arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/trace/exceptions.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/mm/extable.c | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c | 2 +-
Isn't it "funny" that parisc, ia64, powerpc don't use pf/pF in arch code,
but x86, arm, etc. do use pf/pF in arch code?
Surely, I do understand why we have pf/pF in mm, drivers and all over the
place. But still, I'm surprised.
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-04 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-03 17:05 [PATCH] mm/memblock: replace u64 with phys_addr_t where appropriate Mike Rapoport
2018-07-03 17:22 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-03 19:57 ` Andrew Morton
2018-07-03 20:24 ` Joe Perches
2018-07-04 7:03 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-07-04 7:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-07-04 9:04 ` Joe Perches
2018-07-04 9:20 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-07-04 9:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-07-04 15:20 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-07-04 7:54 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2018-07-04 15:21 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-07-04 17:22 ` Joe Perches
2018-07-05 7:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-07-04 7:02 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-07-04 13:05 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-04 13:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-07-04 13:29 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-04 14:04 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180704075449.GB458@jagdpanzerIV \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).