From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] block: update error message for bio_check_ro()
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 14:57:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190701215726.27601-2-chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190701215726.27601-1-chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
The existing code in the bio_check_ro() relies on the op_is_write().
op_is_write() checks for the last bit in the bio_op(). Now that we have
multiple REQ_OP_XXX with last bit set to 1 such as, (from blk_types.h):
/* write sectors to the device */
REQ_OP_WRITE = 1,
/* flush the volatile write cache */
REQ_OP_DISCARD = 3,
/* securely erase sectors */
REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE = 5,
/* write the same sector many times */
REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME = 7,
/* write the zero filled sector many times */
REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES = 9,
it is hard to understand which bio op failed in the bio_check_ro().
Modify the error message in bio_check_ro() to print correct REQ_OP_XXX
with the help of blk_op_str().
Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 5d1fc8e17dd1..47c8b9c48a57 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -786,9 +786,9 @@ static inline bool bio_check_ro(struct bio *bio, struct hd_struct *part)
return false;
WARN_ONCE(1,
- "generic_make_request: Trying to write "
- "to read-only block-device %s (partno %d)\n",
- bio_devname(bio, b), part->partno);
+ "generic_make_request: Trying op %s on the "
+ "read-only block-device %s (partno %d)\n",
+ blk_op_str(op), bio_devname(bio, b), part->partno);
/* Older lvm-tools actually trigger this */
return false;
}
--
2.21.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-01 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-01 21:57 [PATCH 0/5] block: udpate debug messages with blk_op_str() Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-07-01 21:57 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2019-07-03 0:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: update error message for bio_check_ro() Minwoo Im
2019-07-03 2:24 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-07-01 21:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] block: update error message in submit_bio() Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-07-03 0:43 ` Minwoo Im
2019-07-01 21:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] block: allow block_dump to print all REQ_OP_XXX Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-07-03 0:50 ` Minwoo Im
2019-07-03 2:26 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-07-01 21:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: update block_dump comment Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-07-08 18:49 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-07-01 21:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] Documentation/laptop: add block_dump documentation Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-07-08 18:49 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190701215726.27601-2-chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com \
--to=chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).