From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, rientjes@google.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memcg, oom: check memcg margin for parallel oom
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:05:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200714140541.GO24642@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1594735034-19190-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
On Tue 14-07-20 09:57:14, Yafang Shao wrote:
> Memcg oom killer invocation is synchronized by the global oom_lock and
> tasks are sleeping on the lock while somebody is selecting the victim or
> potentially race with the oom_reaper is releasing the victim's memory.
> This can result in a pointless oom killer invocation because a waiter
> might be racing with the oom_reaper
>
> P1 oom_reaper P2
> oom_reap_task mutex_lock(oom_lock)
> out_of_memory # no victim because we have one already
> __oom_reap_task_mm mute_unlock(oom_lock)
> mutex_lock(oom_lock)
> set MMF_OOM_SKIP
> select_bad_process
> # finds a new victim
>
> The page allocator prevents from this race by trying to allocate after
> the lock can be acquired (in __alloc_pages_may_oom) which acts as a last
> minute check. Moreover page allocator simply doesn't block on the
> oom_lock and simply retries the whole reclaim process.
>
> Memcg oom killer should do the last minute check as well. Call
> mem_cgroup_margin to do that. Trylock on the oom_lock could be done as
> well but this doesn't seem to be necessary at this stage.
>
> [mhocko@kernel.org: commit log]
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Thanks!
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> - commit log improved by Michal
> - retitle the subject from "mm, oom: check memcg margin for parallel oom"
> - code simplicity, per Michal
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 1962232..15e0e18 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1560,15 +1560,21 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> .gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
> .order = order,
> };
> - bool ret;
> + bool ret = true;
>
> if (mutex_lock_killable(&oom_lock))
> return true;
> +
> + if (mem_cgroup_margin(memcg) >= (1 << order))
> + goto unlock;
> +
> /*
> * A few threads which were not waiting at mutex_lock_killable() can
> * fail to bail out. Therefore, check again after holding oom_lock.
> */
> ret = should_force_charge() || out_of_memory(&oc);
> +
> +unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&oom_lock);
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 1.8.3.1
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-14 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-14 13:57 [PATCH v2] memcg, oom: check memcg margin for parallel oom Yafang Shao
2020-07-14 14:05 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2020-07-14 14:30 ` Chris Down
2020-07-14 18:46 ` David Rientjes
2020-07-15 1:44 ` Yafang Shao
2020-07-15 2:44 ` David Rientjes
2020-07-15 3:10 ` Yafang Shao
2020-07-15 3:18 ` David Rientjes
2020-07-15 3:31 ` Yafang Shao
2020-07-15 17:30 ` David Rientjes
2020-07-16 2:38 ` Yafang Shao
2020-07-16 7:04 ` David Rientjes
2020-07-16 11:53 ` Yafang Shao
2020-07-16 12:21 ` Michal Hocko
2020-07-16 13:09 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-16 19:53 ` David Rientjes
2020-07-17 1:35 ` Yafang Shao
2020-07-17 19:26 ` David Rientjes
2020-07-18 2:15 ` Yafang Shao
2020-07-16 5:54 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-16 6:11 ` Michal Hocko
2020-07-16 7:06 ` David Rientjes
2020-07-16 6:08 ` Michal Hocko
2020-07-16 6:56 ` David Rientjes
2020-07-16 7:12 ` Michal Hocko
2020-07-16 20:04 ` David Rientjes
2020-07-28 18:04 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-07-15 6:56 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200714140541.GO24642@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).