From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
songmuchun@bytedance.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm/hugetlb: fix incorrect update of max_huge_pages
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:20:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220816162024.60087b143995d9e21413fc52@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YvwfvxXewnZpHQcz@monkey>
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 15:52:47 -0700 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 08/16/22 21:05, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> > There should be pages_per_huge_page(h) / pages_per_huge_page(target_hstate)
> > pages incremented for target_hstate->max_huge_pages when page is demoted.
> > Update max_huge_pages accordingly for consistency.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > mm/hugetlb.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > index ea1c7bfa1cc3..e72052964fb5 100644
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > @@ -3472,7 +3472,8 @@ static int demote_free_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
> > * based on pool changes for the demoted page.
> > */
> > h->max_huge_pages--;
> > - target_hstate->max_huge_pages += pages_per_huge_page(h);
> > + target_hstate->max_huge_pages +=
> > + pages_per_huge_page(h) / pages_per_huge_page(target_hstate);
>
> Thanks!
>
> That is indeed incorrect. However the miscalculation should not have any
> consequences. Correct? The value is used when initially populating the
> pools. It is never read and used again. It is written to in
> set_max_huge_pages if someone changes the number of hugetlb pages.
>
> I guess that is a long way of saying I am not sure why we care about trying
> to keep max_huge_pages up to date? I do not think it matters.
>
> I also thought, if we are going to adjust max_huge_pages here we may
> also want to adjust the node specific value: h->max_huge_pages_node[node].
> There are a few other places where the global max_huge_pages is adjusted
> without adjusting the node specific value.
>
> The more I think about it, the more I think we should explore just
> eliminating any adjustment of this/these values after initially
> populating the pools.
I'm thinking we should fix something that is "indeed incorrect" before
going on to more extensive things?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-16 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-16 13:05 [PATCH 0/6] A few fixup patches for hugetlb Miaohe Lin
2022-08-16 13:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/hugetlb: fix incorrect update of max_huge_pages Miaohe Lin
2022-08-16 22:52 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-08-16 23:20 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2022-08-16 23:34 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-08-17 1:53 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-17 2:28 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-16 13:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm/hugetlb: fix WARN_ON(!kobj) in sysfs_create_group() Miaohe Lin
2022-08-16 22:55 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-08-17 2:31 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-17 2:39 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-16 13:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm/hugetlb: fix missing call to restore_reserve_on_error() Miaohe Lin
2022-08-16 23:31 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-08-17 1:59 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-16 13:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: add missing smp_wmb() before set_pte_at() Miaohe Lin
2022-08-17 2:53 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-17 8:41 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-17 9:13 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-17 11:21 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-18 1:14 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-18 1:55 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-18 2:00 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-18 2:47 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-18 7:52 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-18 7:59 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-18 8:32 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-18 8:40 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-18 8:54 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-18 9:18 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-18 12:58 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-18 23:53 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-19 3:19 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-19 7:26 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-18 1:15 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-20 8:12 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-22 8:45 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-22 10:23 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-23 1:42 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-16 13:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm/hugetlb: fix sysfs group leak in hugetlb_unregister_node() Miaohe Lin
2022-08-17 9:41 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-18 1:00 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-18 1:12 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-16 13:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm/hugetlb: make detecting shared pte more reliable Miaohe Lin
2022-08-17 23:56 ` Mike Kravetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220816162024.60087b143995d9e21413fc52@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).