From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: add missing smp_wmb() before set_pte_at()
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 09:42:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4c99f81-444e-91f3-5eb9-07590676341a@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F8381885-8B9F-405B-A860-AFB8A675D5A7@linux.dev>
On 2022/8/22 18:23, Muchun Song wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 22, 2022, at 16:45, Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2022/8/20 16:12, Muchun Song wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Aug 16, 2022, at 21:05, Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The memory barrier smp_wmb() is needed to make sure that preceding stores
>>>> to the page contents become visible before the below set_pte_at() write.
>>>
>>> I found another place where is a similar case. See kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte() in
>>> mm/kasan/shadow.c.
>>
>> Thanks for your report.
>>
>>>
>>> Should we fix it as well?
>>
>> I'm not familiar with kasan yet, but I think memory barrier is needed here or memory corrupt
>> can't be detected until the contents are visible. smp_mb__after_atomic before set_pte_at should
>> be enough? What's your opinion?
>
> I didn’t see any atomic operation between set_pte_at() and memset(), I don’t think
> smp_mb__after_atomic() is feasible if we really need to insert a barrier. I suggest
Oh, it should be smp_mb__after_spinlock(), i.e. something like below:
diff --git a/mm/kasan/shadow.c b/mm/kasan/shadow.c
index 0e3648b603a6..38e503c89740 100644
--- a/mm/kasan/shadow.c
+++ b/mm/kasan/shadow.c
@@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ static int kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr,
spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
if (likely(pte_none(*ptep))) {
+ smp_mb__after_spinlock();
set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, ptep, pte);
page = 0;
}
Does this make sense for you?
> you to send a RFC patch to KASAN maintainers, they are more familiar with this than
> us.
Sounds like a good idea. Will do it.
Thanks,
Miaohe Lin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-23 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-16 13:05 [PATCH 0/6] A few fixup patches for hugetlb Miaohe Lin
2022-08-16 13:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/hugetlb: fix incorrect update of max_huge_pages Miaohe Lin
2022-08-16 22:52 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-08-16 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
2022-08-16 23:34 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-08-17 1:53 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-17 2:28 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-16 13:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm/hugetlb: fix WARN_ON(!kobj) in sysfs_create_group() Miaohe Lin
2022-08-16 22:55 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-08-17 2:31 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-17 2:39 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-16 13:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm/hugetlb: fix missing call to restore_reserve_on_error() Miaohe Lin
2022-08-16 23:31 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-08-17 1:59 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-16 13:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: add missing smp_wmb() before set_pte_at() Miaohe Lin
2022-08-17 2:53 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-17 8:41 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-17 9:13 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-17 11:21 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-18 1:14 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-18 1:55 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-18 2:00 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-18 2:47 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-18 7:52 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-18 7:59 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-18 8:32 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-18 8:40 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-18 8:54 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-18 9:18 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-18 12:58 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-18 23:53 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-19 3:19 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-19 7:26 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-18 1:15 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-20 8:12 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-22 8:45 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-22 10:23 ` Muchun Song
2022-08-23 1:42 ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2022-08-16 13:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm/hugetlb: fix sysfs group leak in hugetlb_unregister_node() Miaohe Lin
2022-08-17 9:41 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-18 1:00 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-18 1:12 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-16 13:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm/hugetlb: make detecting shared pte more reliable Miaohe Lin
2022-08-17 23:56 ` Mike Kravetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4c99f81-444e-91f3-5eb9-07590676341a@huawei.com \
--to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).