[PATCH v9 4/8] KVM: Use gfn instead of hva for mmu_notifier_retry

[Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>]

Currently in mmu_notifier validate path, hva range is recorded and then
checked against in the mmu_notifier_retry_hva() of the page fault path.
However, for the to be introduced private memory, a page fault may not
have a hva associated, checking gfn(gpa) makes more sense.

For existing non private memory case, gfn is expected to continue to
work. The only downside is when aliasing multiple gfns to a single hva,
the current algorithm of checking multiple ranges could result in a much
larger range being rejected. Such aliasing should be uncommon, so the
impact is expected small.

It also fixes a bug in kvm_zap_gfn_range() which has already been using
gfn when calling kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin/end() while these functions
accept hva in current code.

Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c   |  2 +-
 include/linux/kvm_host.h | 18 +++++++---------
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 6f81539061d6..33b1aec44fb8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -4217,7 +4217,7 @@ static bool is_page_fault_stale(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		return true;
 
 	return fault->slot &&
-	       mmu_invalidate_retry_hva(vcpu->kvm, mmu_seq, fault->hva);
+	       mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn(vcpu->kvm, mmu_seq, fault->gfn);
 }
 
 static int direct_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 739a7562a1f3..79e5cbc35fcf 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -775,8 +775,8 @@ struct kvm {
 	struct mmu_notifier mmu_notifier;
 	unsigned long mmu_invalidate_seq;
 	long mmu_invalidate_in_progress;
-	unsigned long mmu_invalidate_range_start;
-	unsigned long mmu_invalidate_range_end;
+	gfn_t mmu_invalidate_range_start;
+	gfn_t mmu_invalidate_range_end;
 #endif
 	struct list_head devices;
 	u64 manual_dirty_log_protect;
@@ -1365,10 +1365,8 @@ void kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc);
 void *kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc);
 #endif
 
-void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
-			      unsigned long end);
-void kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
-			    unsigned long end);
+void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end);
+void kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end);
 
 long kvm_arch_dev_ioctl(struct file *filp,
 			unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg);
@@ -1937,9 +1935,9 @@ static inline int mmu_invalidate_retry(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mmu_seq)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline int mmu_invalidate_retry_hva(struct kvm *kvm,
+static inline int mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
 					   unsigned long mmu_seq,
-					   unsigned long hva)
+					   gfn_t gfn)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 	/*
@@ -1949,8 +1947,8 @@ static inline int mmu_invalidate_retry_hva(struct kvm *kvm,
 	 * positives, due to shortcuts when handing concurrent invalidations.
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress) &&
-	    hva >= kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start &&
-	    hva < kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_end)
+	    gfn >= kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start &&
+	    gfn < kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_end)
 		return 1;
 	if (kvm->mmu_invalidate_seq != mmu_seq)
 		return 1;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 8dace78a0278..09c9cdeb773c 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -540,8 +540,7 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 
 typedef bool (*hva_handler_t)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
 
-typedef void (*on_lock_fn_t)(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
-			     unsigned long end);
+typedef void (*on_lock_fn_t)(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end);
 
 typedef void (*on_unlock_fn_t)(struct kvm *kvm);
 
@@ -628,7 +627,8 @@ static __always_inline int __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm,
 				locked = true;
 				KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm);
 				if (!IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->on_lock))
-					range->on_lock(kvm, range->start, range->end);
+					range->on_lock(kvm, gfn_range.start,
+							    gfn_range.end);
 				if (IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->handler))
 					break;
 			}
@@ -715,15 +715,9 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_change_pte(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 	kvm_handle_hva_range(mn, address, address + 1, pte, kvm_set_spte_gfn);
 }
 
-void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
-			      unsigned long end)
+static inline void update_invalidate_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start,
+							    gfn_t end)
 {
-	/*
-	 * The count increase must become visible at unlock time as no
-	 * spte can be established without taking the mmu_lock and
-	 * count is also read inside the mmu_lock critical section.
-	 */
-	kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress++;
 	if (likely(kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress == 1)) {
 		kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start = start;
 		kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_end = end;
@@ -744,6 +738,28 @@ void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
 	}
 }
 
+static void mark_invalidate_in_progress(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
+{
+	/*
+	 * The count increase must become visible at unlock time as no
+	 * spte can be established without taking the mmu_lock and
+	 * count is also read inside the mmu_lock critical section.
+	 */
+	kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress++;
+}
+
+static bool kvm_mmu_handle_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
+{
+	update_invalidate_range(kvm, range->start, range->end);
+	return kvm_unmap_gfn_range(kvm, range);
+}
+
+void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
+{
+	mark_invalidate_in_progress(kvm, start, end);
+	update_invalidate_range(kvm, start, end);
+}
+
 static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 					const struct mmu_notifier_range *range)
 {
@@ -752,8 +768,8 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 		.start		= range->start,
 		.end		= range->end,
 		.pte		= __pte(0),
-		.handler	= kvm_unmap_gfn_range,
-		.on_lock	= kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin,
+		.handler	= kvm_mmu_handle_gfn_range,
+		.on_lock	= mark_invalidate_in_progress,
 		.on_unlock	= kvm_arch_guest_memory_reclaimed,
 		.flush_on_ret	= true,
 		.may_block	= mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range),
@@ -791,8 +807,7 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-void kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
-			    unsigned long end)
+void kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
 {
 	/*
 	 * This sequence increase will notify the kvm page fault that
-- 
2.25.1