From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
David Nellans <dnellans@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/16] 1GB THP support on x86_64
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:34:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46604da8-55d0-111d-7854-cbaa8bb65925@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C249991F-A64E-4262-892F-F1587B800264@nvidia.com>
>> As long as we stay in safe zone boundaries you get a benefit in most
>> scenarios. As soon as we would have a (temporary) workload that would
>> require more unmovable allocations we would fallback to polluting some
>> pageblocks only.
>
> The idea would work well until unmoveable pages begin to overflow into
> ZONE_PREFER_MOVABLE or we move the boundary of ZONE_PREFER_MOVABLE to
> avoid unmoveable page overflow. The issue comes from the lifetime of
> the unmoveable pages. Since some long-live ones can be around the boundary,
> there is no guarantee that ZONE_PREFER_MOVABLE cannot grow back
> even if other unmoveable pages are deallocated. Ultimately,
> ZONE_PREFER_MOVABLE would be shrink to a small size and the situation is
> back to what we have now.
As discussed this would not happen in the usual case in case we size it
reasonable. Of course, if you push it to the extreme (which was never
suggested!), you would create mess. There is always a way to create a
mess if you abuse such mechanism. Also see Rik's reply regarding reclaim.
>
> OK. I have a stupid question here. Why not just grow pageblock to a larger
> size, like 1GB? So the fragmentation of unmoveable pages will be at larger
> granularity. But it is less likely unmoveable pages will be allocated at
> a movable pageblock, since the kernel has 1GB pageblock for them after
> a pageblock stealing. If other kinds of pageblocks run out, moveable and
> reclaimable pages can fall back to unmoveable pageblocks.
> What am I missing here?
Oh no. For example pageblocks have to completely fit into a single
section (that's where metadata is maintained). Please refrain from
suggesting to increase the section size ;)
There is plenty of code relying on pageblocks/MAX_ORDER - 1 to be
reasonable in size. Examples in VMs are free page reporting or virtio-mem.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-10 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-02 18:06 [RFC PATCH 00/16] 1GB THP support on x86_64 Zi Yan
2020-09-02 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 01/16] mm: add pagechain container for storing multiple pages Zi Yan
2020-09-02 20:29 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-09-02 20:48 ` Zi Yan
2020-09-03 3:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-07 12:22 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-09-07 15:11 ` Zi Yan
2020-09-09 13:46 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-09-09 14:15 ` Zi Yan
2020-09-02 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 02/16] mm: thp: 1GB anonymous page implementation Zi Yan
2020-09-02 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 03/16] mm: proc: add 1GB THP kpageflag Zi Yan
2020-09-09 13:46 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-09-02 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16] mm: thp: 1GB THP copy on write implementation Zi Yan
2020-09-02 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16] mm: thp: handling 1GB THP reference bit Zi Yan
2020-09-09 14:09 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-09-09 14:36 ` Zi Yan
2020-09-02 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 06/16] mm: thp: add 1GB THP split_huge_pud_page() function Zi Yan
2020-09-09 14:18 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-09-09 14:19 ` Zi Yan
2020-09-02 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 07/16] mm: stats: make smap stats understand PUD THPs Zi Yan
2020-09-02 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16] mm: page_vma_walk: teach it about PMD-mapped PUD THP Zi Yan
2020-09-02 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 09/16] mm: thp: 1GB THP support in try_to_unmap() Zi Yan
2020-09-02 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16] mm: thp: split 1GB THPs at page reclaim Zi Yan
2020-09-02 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16] mm: thp: 1GB THP follow_p*d_page() support Zi Yan
2020-09-02 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16] mm: support 1GB THP pagemap support Zi Yan
2020-09-02 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 13/16] mm: thp: add a knob to enable/disable 1GB THPs Zi Yan
2020-09-02 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 14/16] mm: page_alloc: >=MAX_ORDER pages allocation an deallocation Zi Yan
2020-09-02 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16] hugetlb: cma: move cma reserve function to cma.c Zi Yan
2020-09-02 18:06 ` [RFC PATCH 16/16] mm: thp: use cma reservation for pud thp allocation Zi Yan
2020-09-02 18:40 ` [RFC PATCH 00/16] 1GB THP support on x86_64 Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-02 18:45 ` Zi Yan
2020-09-02 18:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-02 19:05 ` Zi Yan
2020-09-02 19:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-02 20:29 ` Zi Yan
2020-09-03 16:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-03 16:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-03 17:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-03 7:32 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-03 16:25 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-09-03 16:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-03 17:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-03 17:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-03 20:57 ` Mike Kravetz
2020-09-03 21:06 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-09-04 7:42 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-04 21:10 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-09-07 7:20 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-08 15:09 ` Zi Yan
2020-09-08 19:58 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-09-09 4:01 ` John Hubbard
2020-09-09 7:15 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-03 14:23 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-09-03 16:30 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-09-08 11:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-08 14:05 ` Zi Yan
2020-09-08 14:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-08 15:36 ` Zi Yan
2020-09-08 14:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-08 15:50 ` Zi Yan
2020-09-09 12:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-09 12:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-09 13:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-09 13:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-10 10:02 ` William Kucharski
2020-09-08 14:35 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-08 14:41 ` Rik van Riel
2020-09-08 15:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-09 7:04 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-09 13:19 ` Rik van Riel
2020-09-09 13:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-09 13:49 ` Rik van Riel
2020-09-09 13:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-10 7:32 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-10 8:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-10 14:21 ` Zi Yan
2020-09-10 14:34 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-09-10 14:41 ` Zi Yan
2020-09-10 15:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-10 13:32 ` Rik van Riel
2020-09-10 14:30 ` Zi Yan
2020-09-09 13:59 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46604da8-55d0-111d-7854-cbaa8bb65925@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dnellans@nvidia.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).