linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
	Mark Seaborn <mseaborn@chromium.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] pagemap: do not leak physical addresses to non-privileged userspace
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:20:32 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54FE0EA0.7030002@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425935472-17949-1-git-send-email-kirill@shutemov.name>

On 03/10/2015 12:11 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> 
> As pointed by recent post[1] on exploiting DRAM physical imperfection,
> /proc/PID/pagemap exposes sensitive information which can be used to do
> attacks.
> 
> This is RFC patch which disallow anybody without CAP_SYS_ADMIN to read
> the pagemap.
> 
> Any comments?

If I'm not mistaken, the pagemap file is used by some userspace that does 
working-set size analysis. But this thing only needs the flags (referenced
bit) from the PTE-s. Maybe it would be better not to lock this file completely,
but instead report the PFN part as zero?

Other than this, I don't mind :) Although we use this heavily in CRIU we
anyway work only with the CAP_SYS_ADMIN, so adding the new one doesn't hurt.

Thanks,
Pavel

> [1] http://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2015/03/exploiting-dram-rowhammer-bug-to-gain.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Mark Seaborn <mseaborn@chromium.org>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> ---
>  fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index 246eae84b13b..b72b36e64286 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -1322,6 +1322,9 @@ out:
>  
>  static int pagemap_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  {
> +	/* do not disclose physical addresses: attack vector */
> +	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> +		return -EPERM;
>  	pr_warn_once("Bits 55-60 of /proc/PID/pagemap entries are about "
>  			"to stop being page-shift some time soon. See the "
>  			"linux/Documentation/vm/pagemap.txt for details.\n");
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-09 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-09 21:11 [RFC, PATCH] pagemap: do not leak physical addresses to non-privileged userspace Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-03-09 21:20 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2015-03-09 22:09 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2015-03-10  0:11 ` Kees Cook
2015-03-10  0:19   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-10  2:36     ` Dave Hansen
2015-03-16 21:11 ` Pavel Machek
2015-03-17  0:49   ` Mark Seaborn
2015-03-17  1:21     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-17 11:16       ` rowhammer and pagemap (was Re: [RFC, PATCH] pagemap: do not leak physical addresses to non-privileged userspace) Pavel Machek
2015-03-17 17:58         ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-03-23 21:26           ` Pavel Machek
2015-03-19 12:51       ` [RFC, PATCH] pagemap: do not leak physical addresses to non-privileged userspace Vlastimil Babka
2015-03-23 21:26         ` Pavel Machek
2015-03-23 22:36           ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54FE0EA0.7030002@parallels.com \
    --to=xemul@parallels.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mseaborn@chromium.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).