* linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree
@ 2011-06-03 1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-03 14:50 ` [PATCH] btrfs: fix uninitialized variable warning David Sterba
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-06-03 1:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Mason
Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Miao Xie, David Sterba, Tsutomu Itoh,
Itaru Kitayama
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 465 bytes --]
Hi all,
With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powercp ppc64_defconfig)
produced this warning:
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c: In function 'btrfs_delayed_update_inode':
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1598:6: warning: 'ret' may be used uninitialized in this function
Introduced by commit 16cdcec736cd ("btrfs: implement delayed inode items
operation").
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] btrfs: fix uninitialized variable warning
2011-06-03 1:00 linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-06-03 14:50 ` David Sterba
2011-06-03 14:56 ` Chris Mason
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2011-06-03 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Chris Mason, linux-next, linux-kernel, Miao Xie, David Sterba,
Tsutomu Itoh, Itaru Kitayama, linux-btrfs
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powercp ppc64_defconfig)
produced this warning:
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c: In function 'btrfs_delayed_update_inode':
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1598:6: warning: 'ret' may be used
uninitialized in this function
Introduced by commit 16cdcec736cd ("btrfs: implement delayed inode items
operation").
This fixes a bug in btrfs_update_inode(): if the returned value from
btrfs_delayed_update_inode is a nonzero garbage, inode stat data are not
updated and several call paths may hit a BUG_ON or fail with strange
code.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
---
patch pushed to git://repo.or.cz/linux-2.6/btrfs-unstable.git #fixes
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
index 01e2950..8cb012f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
@@ -1595,7 +1595,7 @@ int btrfs_delayed_update_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root, struct inode *inode)
{
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node;
- int ret;
+ int ret = 0;
delayed_node = btrfs_get_or_create_delayed_node(inode);
if (IS_ERR(delayed_node))
--
1.7.5.2.353.g5df3e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix uninitialized variable warning
2011-06-03 14:50 ` [PATCH] btrfs: fix uninitialized variable warning David Sterba
@ 2011-06-03 14:56 ` Chris Mason
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Chris Mason @ 2011-06-03 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dave
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, linux-kernel, Miao Xie,
Tsutomu Itoh, Itaru Kitayama, linux-btrfs
Excerpts from David Sterba's message of 2011-06-03 10:50:14 -0400:
> From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
>
> With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powercp ppc64_defconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c: In function 'btrfs_delayed_update_inode':
> fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1598:6: warning: 'ret' may be used
> uninitialized in this function
>
> Introduced by commit 16cdcec736cd ("btrfs: implement delayed inode items
> operation").
>
> This fixes a bug in btrfs_update_inode(): if the returned value from
> btrfs_delayed_update_inode is a nonzero garbage, inode stat data are not
> updated and several call paths may hit a BUG_ON or fail with strange
> code.
Ugh, thanks! It looks like the gcc uninit stuff isn't as verbose as it
used to be, but it does catch a bunch of allocated/set but not used
vars.
I have a nitems = 0 fix in my tree as well.
-chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree
2021-07-20 7:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2021-08-10 9:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-08-10 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown, William A. Kennington III
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 928 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:31:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 12:25:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 17:20:26 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > When building Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
> > > this warning:
> > >
> > > include/linux/spi/spi.h:671: warning: Function parameter or member 'devm_allocated' not described in 'spi_controller'
> > >
> > > Introduced by commit
> > >
> > > 794aaf01444d ("spi: Fix use-after-free with devm_spi_alloc_*")
> > >
> > > This has been around for a while (at least v5.13-rc1 and next-20210409).
> > > Sorry I did not report it earlier.
> >
> > I am still getting this warning.
>
> I am still getting this warning. It is now on line 675.
Now line 672 ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree
2021-07-08 2:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2021-07-20 7:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-10 9:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-07-20 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown, William A. Kennington III
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 778 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 12:25:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 17:20:26 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > When building Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
> > this warning:
> >
> > include/linux/spi/spi.h:671: warning: Function parameter or member 'devm_allocated' not described in 'spi_controller'
> >
> > Introduced by commit
> >
> > 794aaf01444d ("spi: Fix use-after-free with devm_spi_alloc_*")
> >
> > This has been around for a while (at least v5.13-rc1 and next-20210409).
> > Sorry I did not report it earlier.
>
> I am still getting this warning.
I am still getting this warning. It is now on line 675.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree
2021-06-01 7:20 linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2021-07-08 2:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-07-20 7:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-07-08 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown, William A. Kennington III
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 601 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 17:20:26 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> When building Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
> this warning:
>
> include/linux/spi/spi.h:671: warning: Function parameter or member 'devm_allocated' not described in 'spi_controller'
>
> Introduced by commit
>
> 794aaf01444d ("spi: Fix use-after-free with devm_spi_alloc_*")
>
> This has been around for a while (at least v5.13-rc1 and next-20210409).
> Sorry I did not report it earlier.
I am still getting this warning.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree
@ 2021-06-01 7:20 Stephen Rothwell
2021-07-08 2:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-06-01 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown, William A. Kennington III
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 458 bytes --]
Hi all,
When building Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
this warning:
include/linux/spi/spi.h:671: warning: Function parameter or member 'devm_allocated' not described in 'spi_controller'
Introduced by commit
794aaf01444d ("spi: Fix use-after-free with devm_spi_alloc_*")
This has been around for a while (at least v5.13-rc1 and next-20210409).
Sorry I did not report it earlier.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree
2019-08-29 22:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2019-08-30 0:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-08-30 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra,
Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 273 bytes --]
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:29:21 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Yes. We have a fix queued which should hit next tomorrow.
Excellent, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree
2019-08-29 22:23 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2019-08-29 22:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-30 0:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2019-08-29 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra,
Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Stephen,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> From Linus tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> arch/x86/boot/edd.c: In function 'query_edd':
> arch/x86/boot/edd.c:148:11: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct boot_params' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member]
> 148 | mbrptr = boot_params.edd_mbr_sig_buffer;
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>
> I assume this is a result of upgrading my x86_64 cross compiler to v9.2.1
> (from v8.3.0).
Yes. We have a fix queued which should hit next tomorrow.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree
@ 2019-08-29 22:23 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-29 22:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-08-29 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 522 bytes --]
Hi all,
From Linus tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced this warning:
arch/x86/boot/edd.c: In function 'query_edd':
arch/x86/boot/edd.c:148:11: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct boot_params' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member]
148 | mbrptr = boot_params.edd_mbr_sig_buffer;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
I assume this is a result of upgrading my x86_64 cross compiler to v9.2.1
(from v8.3.0).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree
@ 2017-02-26 23:23 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2017-02-26 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Dave Jiang, Andrew Morton,
Matthew Wilcox, Ross Zwisler
Hi all,
With just Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig)
produced this warning:
fs/dax.c: In function 'dax_iomap_fault':
fs/dax.c:1462:35: warning: passing argument 2 of 'dax_iomap_pmd_fault' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
return dax_iomap_pmd_fault(vmf, ops);
^
fs/dax.c:1439:12: note: expected 'struct iomap_ops *' but argument is of type 'const struct iomap_ops *'
static int dax_iomap_pmd_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct iomap_ops *ops)
^
Introduced by commit
a2d581675d48 ("mm,fs,dax: change ->pmd_fault to ->huge_fault")
which missed fixing up the !CONFIG_FS_DAX_PMD case.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree
2011-06-03 1:10 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-06-03 14:17 ` David Sterba
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2011-06-03 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Chris Mason, linux-next, linux-kernel, Miao Xie, David Sterba,
Tsutomu Itoh, Itaru Kitayama, Linus
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 11:10:49AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c: In function 'btrfs_batch_insert_items':
> fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:670:6: warning: 'nitems' may be used uninitialized in this function
>
> Introduced by commit 16cdcec736cd ("btrfs: implement delayed inode items
> operation"). I think this is a real bug. This variable is not
> initialised, only incremented and tested.
yes, it's a bug and has been already hit (fix pending):
http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=130678270307885&w=4
thanks,
david
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree
@ 2011-06-03 1:10 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-03 14:17 ` David Sterba
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-06-03 1:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Mason
Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Miao Xie, David Sterba, Tsutomu Itoh,
Itaru Kitayama, Linus
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 606 bytes --]
Hi all,
With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) produced
this warning:
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c: In function 'btrfs_batch_insert_items':
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:670:6: warning: 'nitems' may be used uninitialized in this function
Introduced by commit 16cdcec736cd ("btrfs: implement delayed inode items
operation"). I think this is a real bug. This variable is not
initialised, only incremented and tested.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
P.S. Chris, time to get a tree into linux-next?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree
2010-10-27 0:29 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2010-10-27 0:58 ` Jesse Gross
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jesse Gross @ 2010-10-27 0:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: David Miller, netdev, linux-next, linux-kernel
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While building Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> drivers/net/igb/igb_main.c: In function 'igb_xmit_frame_ring_adv':
> drivers/net/igb/igb_main.c:4110: warning: unused variable 'adapter'
>
> Introduced by commit eab6d18d20fc5b5ba04a7e7fcd6f357197870e51 ("vlan:
> Don't check for vlan group before vlan_tx_tag_present").
Patch sent out to resolve this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree
@ 2010-10-27 0:29 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-27 0:58 ` Jesse Gross
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-10-27 0:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller, netdev; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Jesse Gross
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 524 bytes --]
Hi all,
While building Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced this warning:
drivers/net/igb/igb_main.c: In function 'igb_xmit_frame_ring_adv':
drivers/net/igb/igb_main.c:4110: warning: unused variable 'adapter'
Introduced by commit eab6d18d20fc5b5ba04a7e7fcd6f357197870e51 ("vlan:
Don't check for vlan group before vlan_tx_tag_present").
Sorry I didn't catch it earlier.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree
@ 2010-10-27 0:00 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-10-27 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Alan Cox
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 427 bytes --]
Hi ,
While building Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced this warning:
drivers/char/pcmcia/synclink_cs.c:2194: warning: 'mgslpc_get_icount' defined but not used
Introduced by commit 0587102cf9f427c185bfdeb2cef41e13ee0264b1 ("tty:
icount changeover for other main devices").
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree
2010-09-24 4:08 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2010-09-24 12:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2010-09-24 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-next, linux-kernel
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:08:59PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Today's (and lots before) linux-next build (i386 defconfig) produced this
> warning:
>
> fs/autofs4/root.c:31: warning: 'autofs4_root_compat_ioctl' declared 'static' but never defined
>
> Introduced by commit c9243f5bdd6637b2bb7dc254b54d9edf957ef17e
> ("autofs/autofs4: Move compat_ioctl handling into fs").
Yeah, I've seen two patches:
autofs: only declare function when CONFIG_COMPAT is defined
autofs4: fix compilation warning
I'm going to relay them. Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree
@ 2010-09-24 4:08 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-24 12:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-09-24 4:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Frederic Weisbecker
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 426 bytes --]
Hi Arnd,
Today's (and lots before) linux-next build (i386 defconfig) produced this
warning:
fs/autofs4/root.c:31: warning: 'autofs4_root_compat_ioctl' declared 'static' but never defined
Introduced by commit c9243f5bdd6637b2bb7dc254b54d9edf957ef17e
("autofs/autofs4: Move compat_ioctl handling into fs").
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-10 9:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-03 1:00 linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-03 14:50 ` [PATCH] btrfs: fix uninitialized variable warning David Sterba
2011-06-03 14:56 ` Chris Mason
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-01 7:20 linux-next: build warning from Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2021-07-08 2:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-07-20 7:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-10 9:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-29 22:23 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-29 22:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-30 0:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-26 23:23 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-03 1:10 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-03 14:17 ` David Sterba
2010-10-27 0:29 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-27 0:58 ` Jesse Gross
2010-10-27 0:00 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-24 4:08 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-24 12:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).