linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:09:09 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161212160909.GB29792@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161209133813.79fe0f87@canb.auug.org.au>

On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 01:38:13PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/pci/msi.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   67f1e4473857 ("PCI/MSI: Document new parameter for msi_capability_init()")
> 
> from the pci tree and commit:
> 
>   61e1c5905290 ("PCI/MSI: Propagate IRQ affinity description through the MSI code")
> 
> from the tip tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thanks, I didn't realize Thomas had already merged this.  I dropped
the slightly different one from my tree.

> diff --cc drivers/pci/msi.c
> index da95f4e689f2,dd27f73a45fc..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@@ -753,14 -754,14 +754,14 @@@ static void msix_program_entries(struc
>    * @dev: pointer to the pci_dev data structure of MSI-X device function
>    * @entries: pointer to an array of struct msix_entry entries
>    * @nvec: number of @entries
> -  * @affinity: flag to indicate CPU IRQ affinity mask should be set
> +  * @affd: Optional pointer to enable automatic affinity assignement
>    *
>    * Setup the MSI-X capability structure of device function with a
>  - * single MSI-X irq. A return of zero indicates the successful setup of
>  - * requested MSI-X entries with allocated irqs or non-zero for otherwise.
>  + * single MSI-X IRQ. A return of zero indicates the successful setup of
>  + * requested MSI-X entries with allocated IRQs or non-zero for otherwise.
>    **/
>   static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msix_entry *entries,
> - 				int nvec, bool affinity)
> + 				int nvec, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
>   {
>   	int ret;
>   	u16 control;

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-12 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-09  2:38 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-12 16:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-09  2:47 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-31 23:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-21  4:11 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-30  4:03 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-30 10:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-30 17:40   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-10-01  6:38 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-01 16:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-25  5:35 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-13  3:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-25  5:21 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-13  3:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-28  3:15 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-29  0:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-24  5:18 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-24 10:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-12 22:18 Mark Brown
2014-03-03  6:07 Stephen Rothwell
2014-03-03  6:03 Stephen Rothwell
2014-03-03  9:26 ` Liviu Dudau
2013-10-29  6:33 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161212160909.GB29792@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).