From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:34:52 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201013143452.4ccade99@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200925153510.5fe319ca@canb.auug.org.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 986 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:35:10 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 2705b8e4d46f ("x86/apic/msi: Use Real PCI DMA device when configuring IRTE")
>
> from the pci tree and commit:
>
> 7ca435cf857d ("x86/irq: Cleanup the arch_*_msi_irqs() leftovers")
>
> from the tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the latter removed the code updated by the former, so I
> did that) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
> linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned
> to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.
> You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
> conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
This is now a conflict between the pci tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-13 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-25 5:35 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-13 3:34 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-09 2:47 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-31 23:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-21 4:11 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-30 4:03 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-30 10:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-30 17:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-10-01 6:38 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-01 16:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-25 5:21 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-13 3:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-28 3:15 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-29 0:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-09 2:38 Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-12 16:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-11-24 5:18 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-24 10:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-12 22:18 Mark Brown
2014-03-03 6:07 Stephen Rothwell
2014-03-03 6:03 Stephen Rothwell
2014-03-03 9:26 ` Liviu Dudau
2013-10-29 6:33 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201013143452.4ccade99@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jonathan.derrick@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).