Coverity: nxp_spifi_read_reg(): Integer handling issues

Coverity: nxp_spifi_read_reg(): Integer handling issues

[coverity-bot]

Hello!

This is an experimental automated report about issues detected by Coverity
from a scan of next-20191025 as part of the linux-next weekly scan project:
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux-next-weekly-scan

You're getting this email because you were associated with the identified
lines of code (noted below) that were touched by recent commits:

f617b9587c16 ("mtd: spi-nor: add driver for NXP SPI Flash Interface (SPIFI)")

Coverity reported the following:

*** CID 1487374:  Integer handling issues  (SIGN_EXTENSION)
/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/nxp-spifi.c: 138 in nxp_spifi_read_reg()
132
133     	ret = nxp_spifi_set_memory_mode_off(spifi);
134     	if (ret)
135     		return ret;
136
137     	cmd = SPIFI_CMD_DATALEN(len) |
vvv     CID 1487374:  Integer handling issues  (SIGN_EXTENSION)
vvv     Suspicious implicit sign extension: "opcode" with type "u8" (8 bits, unsigned) is promoted in "opcode << 24" to type "int" (32 bits, signed), then sign-extended to type "unsigned long" (64 bits, unsigned).  If "opcode << 24" is greater than 0x7FFFFFFF, the upper bits of the result will all be 1.
138     	      SPIFI_CMD_OPCODE(opcode) |
139     	      SPIFI_CMD_FIELDFORM_ALL_SERIAL |
140     	      SPIFI_CMD_FRAMEFORM_OPCODE_ONLY;
141     	writel(cmd, spifi->io_base + SPIFI_CMD);
142
143     	while (len--)

If this is a false positive, please let us know so we can mark it as
such, or teach the Coverity rules to be smarter. If not, please make
sure fixes get into linux-next. :) For patches fixing this, please
include:

Reported-by: coverity-bot <keescook+coverity-bot@chromium.org>
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1487374 ("Integer handling issues")
Fixes: f617b9587c16 ("mtd: spi-nor: add driver for NXP SPI Flash Interface (SPIFI)")


Thanks for your attention!

-- 
Coverity-bot