linux-next: Tree for Dec 13

linux-next: Tree for Dec 13

[broonie]

Hi all,

Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 5960
 6555 files changed, 277265 insertions(+), 120864 deletions(-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have created today's linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
(patches at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/next/ ).  If you
are tracking the linux-next tree using git, you should not use "git pull"
to do so as that will try to merge the new linux-next release with the
old one.  You should use "git fetch" and checkout or reset to the new
master.

You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees
file in the source.  There are also quilt-import.log and merge.log
files in the Next directory.  Between each merge, the tree was built
with a defconfig for arm64, an allmodconfig for x86_64, a
multi_v7_defconfig for arm and a native build of tools/perf.

Below is a summary of the state of the merge.

I am currently merging 346 trees (counting Linus' and 94 trees of bug
fix patches pending for the current merge release).

Stats about the size of the tree over time can be seen at
http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html .

Status of my local build tests will be at
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next .  If maintainers want to give
advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open to add
more builds.

Thanks to Randy Dunlap for doing many randconfig builds.  And to Paul
Gortmaker for triage and bug fixes.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 13 (SND_AMD_ACP_CONFIG)

[Randy Dunlap]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 667 bytes --]



On 12/13/21 19:02, broonie@kernel.org wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 5960
>  6555 files changed, 277265 insertions(+), 120864 deletions(-)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

on i386 or x86_64:

when # CONFIG_ACPI is not set,
so SND_SOC_ACPI is not set:

WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_AMD_ACP_CONFIG
  Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && SND_SOC_ACPI [=n]
  Selected by [y]:
  - SND_SOC_AMD_ACP_COMMON [=y] && SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && X86 [=y] && PCI [=y]


Full randconfig file is attached

-- 
~Randy

[-- Attachment #2: config-r1848.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 30820 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 13 (SND_AMD_ACP_CONFIG)

[Pierre-Louis Bossart]

> on i386 or x86_64:
> 
> when # CONFIG_ACPI is not set,
> so SND_SOC_ACPI is not set:
> 
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_AMD_ACP_CONFIG
>   Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && SND_SOC_ACPI [=n]
>   Selected by [y]:
>   - SND_SOC_AMD_ACP_COMMON [=y] && SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && X86 [=y] && PCI [=y]
> 
> 
> Full randconfig file is attached

It's probably triggered by my recent change to fix another problem.

d9b994cd7641 ASoC: AMD: acp-config: fix missing dependency on SND_SOC_ACPI

I didn't realize SND_AMD_ACP_CONFIG was selected by other configs.
Moving to a select seems to fix the issue reported by Randy, not sure if
it's the right thing to do though.


diff --git a/sound/soc/amd/Kconfig b/sound/soc/amd/Kconfig
index bcfeb3fc2592..7a9e45094f37 100644
--- a/sound/soc/amd/Kconfig
+++ b/sound/soc/amd/Kconfig
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ config SND_SOC_AMD_YC_MACH

 config SND_AMD_ACP_CONFIG
        tristate "AMD ACP configuration selection"
-       depends on SND_SOC_ACPI
+       select SND_SOC_ACPI if ACPI
        help
         This option adds an auto detection to determine which ACP
         driver modules to use

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 13 (SND_AMD_ACP_CONFIG)

[Randy Dunlap]

Hi--

On 12/14/21 05:51, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> 
> 
>> on i386 or x86_64:
>>
>> when # CONFIG_ACPI is not set,
>> so SND_SOC_ACPI is not set:
>>
>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_AMD_ACP_CONFIG
>>   Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && SND_SOC_ACPI [=n]
>>   Selected by [y]:
>>   - SND_SOC_AMD_ACP_COMMON [=y] && SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && X86 [=y] && PCI [=y]
>>
>>
>> Full randconfig file is attached
> 
> It's probably triggered by my recent change to fix another problem.
> 
> d9b994cd7641 ASoC: AMD: acp-config: fix missing dependency on SND_SOC_ACPI
> 
> I didn't realize SND_AMD_ACP_CONFIG was selected by other configs.
> Moving to a select seems to fix the issue reported by Randy, not sure if
> it's the right thing to do though.
> 

That works. You can add my Ack if you want to push this patch.
Thanks.

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested

> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/amd/Kconfig b/sound/soc/amd/Kconfig
> index bcfeb3fc2592..7a9e45094f37 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/amd/Kconfig
> +++ b/sound/soc/amd/Kconfig
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ config SND_SOC_AMD_YC_MACH
> 
>  config SND_AMD_ACP_CONFIG
>         tristate "AMD ACP configuration selection"
> -       depends on SND_SOC_ACPI
> +       select SND_SOC_ACPI if ACPI
>         help
>          This option adds an auto detection to determine which ACP
>          driver modules to use
> 
> 

-- 
~Randy

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 13 (SND_AMD_ACP_CONFIG)

[Daniel Baluta]

Hi Randy,

This should be fixed by https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/3284

Let me quickly send this to alsa-devel.


On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:08 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/13/21 19:02, broonie@kernel.org wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 5960
> >  6555 files changed, 277265 insertions(+), 120864 deletions(-)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> on i386 or x86_64:
>
> when # CONFIG_ACPI is not set,
> so SND_SOC_ACPI is not set:
>
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_AMD_ACP_CONFIG
>   Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && SND_SOC_ACPI [=n]
>   Selected by [y]:
>   - SND_SOC_AMD_ACP_COMMON [=y] && SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && X86 [=y] && PCI [=y]
>
>
> Full randconfig file is attached
>
> --
> ~Randy

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 13 (SND_AMD_ACP_CONFIG)

[Pierre-Louis Bossart]

On 12/14/21 11:21 AM, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> 
> This should be fixed by https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/3284

no, this was precisely the change that exposed a new problem.

https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/3335 contains the suggested
fix posted earlier. We should know tomorrow if the 0day bot finds any
other issues.

> 
> Let me quickly send this to alsa-devel.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:08 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/13/21 19:02, broonie@kernel.org wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 5960
>>>  6555 files changed, 277265 insertions(+), 120864 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>> on i386 or x86_64:
>>
>> when # CONFIG_ACPI is not set,
>> so SND_SOC_ACPI is not set:
>>
>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_AMD_ACP_CONFIG
>>   Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && SND_SOC_ACPI [=n]
>>   Selected by [y]:
>>   - SND_SOC_AMD_ACP_COMMON [=y] && SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && X86 [=y] && PCI [=y]
>>
>>
>> Full randconfig file is attached
>>
>> --
>> ~Randy

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 13 (SND_AMD_ACP_CONFIG)

[Daniel Baluta]

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 7:26 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart
<pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/14/21 11:21 AM, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> > Hi Randy,
> >
> > This should be fixed by https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/3284
>
> no, this was precisely the change that exposed a new problem.
>
> https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/3335 contains the suggested
> fix posted earlier. We should know tomorrow if the 0day bot finds any
> other issues.
>
> >
> > Let me quickly send this to alsa-devel.

Thanks Pierre. I have seen your PR now!

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 13

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 03:02:15AM +0000, broonie@kernel.org wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 5960
>  6555 files changed, 277265 insertions(+), 120864 deletions(-)

Mark, is it possible to add tags to the releases, please?

When you do them tags are missed, I have to add them manually after my scripts
out of a sudden switched from Linux Next base to latest used vanilla tag with
all nice outcomes...

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I have created today's linux-next tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
> (patches at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/next/ ).  If you
> are tracking the linux-next tree using git, you should not use "git pull"
> to do so as that will try to merge the new linux-next release with the
> old one.  You should use "git fetch" and checkout or reset to the new
> master.
> 
> You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees
> file in the source.  There are also quilt-import.log and merge.log
> files in the Next directory.  Between each merge, the tree was built
> with a defconfig for arm64, an allmodconfig for x86_64, a
> multi_v7_defconfig for arm and a native build of tools/perf.
> 
> Below is a summary of the state of the merge.
> 
> I am currently merging 346 trees (counting Linus' and 94 trees of bug
> fix patches pending for the current merge release).
> 
> Stats about the size of the tree over time can be seen at
> http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html .
> 
> Status of my local build tests will be at
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next .  If maintainers want to give
> advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open to add
> more builds.
> 
> Thanks to Randy Dunlap for doing many randconfig builds.  And to Paul
> Gortmaker for triage and bug fixes.
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko