linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree
@ 2024-02-21 23:06 Stephen Rothwell
  2024-02-23 19:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2024-02-21 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Namhyung Kim
  Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 754 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the perf tree, today's linux-next build (native perf)
failed like this:

util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:15: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'struct timespec64'
        __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
                     ^     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:29: note: forward declaration of 'struct timespec64'
        __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
                                   ^

Caused by commit

  29d16de26df1 ("perf augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf: Move 'struct timespec64' to vmlinux.h")

This is a ppc64 le build.

I have used the perf tree from next-20240221 for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree
  2024-02-21 23:06 linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2024-02-23 19:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  2024-02-23 20:11   ` [solved] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2024-02-23 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Namhyung Kim, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:06:56AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the perf tree, today's linux-next build (native perf)
> failed like this:
> 
> util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:15: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'struct timespec64'
>         __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
>                      ^     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:29: note: forward declaration of 'struct timespec64'
>         __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
>                                    ^
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   29d16de26df1 ("perf augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf: Move 'struct timespec64' to vmlinux.h")
> 
> This is a ppc64 le build.
> 
> I have used the perf tree from next-20240221 for today.

Ok, finally I managed to secure a ppc64 machine to test this and
sometimes I reproduce just like you reported, but sometimes I can't do
it, didn't manage to isolate what is that makes it fail sometimes, make
-C tools/perf clean, nuking the O= target directory, etc, when I
reproduce it:

  GENSKEL /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.skel.h
util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:15: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'struct timespec64'
  329 |         __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
      |                      ^     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:29: note: forward declaration of 'struct timespec64'
  329 |         __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
      |                                    ^
1 error generated.
make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:1161: /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/.tmp/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: *** [Makefile.perf:264: sub-make] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:113: install-bin] Error 2
make: Leaving directory '/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf'

$ cat /etc/redhat-release 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 9.5 Beta (Plow)
$
Linux host 5.14.0-425.el9.ppc64le #1 SMP Wed Feb 21 15:29:04 EST 2024 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux

$ clang -v
clang version 17.0.6 (Red Hat, Inc. 17.0.6-5.el9)
Target: ppc64le-redhat-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /usr/bin
Found candidate GCC installation: /opt/rh/gcc-toolset-13/root/usr/lib/gcc/ppc64le-redhat-linux/13
Selected GCC installation: /opt/rh/gcc-toolset-13/root/usr/lib/gcc/ppc64le-redhat-linux/13
Candidate multilib: .;@m64
Selected multilib: .;@m64


But this is an elusive bug, its not always that it fails :-\

$ git log --oneline -1
659663f0bccc (HEAD -> perf-tools-next, perf-tools-next/perf-tools-next) perf: script: prefer capstone to XED
$ file /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/.tmp/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.o 
/tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/.tmp/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.o: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, eBPF, version 1 (SYSV), with debug_info, not stripped
$ 

That "incomplete" type is defined in:

$ grep timespec64 -B10 -A3 tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/vmlinux/vmlinux.h 

typedef __u8 u8;
typedef __u32 u32;
typedef __u64 u64;
typedef __s64 s64;

typedef int pid_t;

typedef __s64 time64_t;

struct timespec64 {
        time64_t        tv_sec;
        long int        tv_nsec;
};
$

But it is used only on this sizeof expression, that is used only by
clang and for the BPF target...

$ grep timespec64 tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c
	__u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
$

Stephen, can you try to reproduce this again? And if it fails, try
reproducing that 'sizeof(struct timespec64)' with 16, which is, in
ppc64:

$ uname -m
ppc64le
$ pahole timespec64
struct timespec64 {
	time64_t                   tv_sec;               /*     0     8 */
	long int                   tv_nsec;              /*     8     8 */

	/* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 2 */
	/* last cacheline: 16 bytes */
};

$ 

And on x86_64:

acme@x1:~$ uname -m
x86_64
acme@x1:~$ pahole timespec64
struct timespec64 {
	time64_t                   tv_sec;               /*     0     8 */
	long int                   tv_nsec;              /*     8     8 */

	/* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 2 */
	/* last cacheline: 16 bytes */
};

acme@x1:~$

- Arnaldo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [solved] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree
  2024-02-23 19:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
@ 2024-02-23 20:11   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  2024-02-23 20:34     ` Namhyung Kim
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2024-02-23 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell, Ian Rogers
  Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Namhyung Kim, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:50:47PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:06:56AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > After merging the perf tree, today's linux-next build (native perf)
> > failed like this:
> > 
> > util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:15: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'struct timespec64'
> >         __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
> >                      ^     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:29: note: forward declaration of 'struct timespec64'
> >         __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
> >                                    ^
> > 
> > Caused by commit
> > 
> >   29d16de26df1 ("perf augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf: Move 'struct timespec64' to vmlinux.h")
> > 
> > This is a ppc64 le build.
> > 
> > I have used the perf tree from next-20240221 for today.
> 
> Ok, finally I managed to secure a ppc64 machine to test this and
> sometimes I reproduce just like you reported, but sometimes I can't do
> it, didn't manage to isolate what is that makes it fail sometimes, make
> -C tools/perf clean, nuking the O= target directory, etc, when I
> reproduce it:

So I think I see the problem, I now left the build directory with a
previous build from torvalds/master, then switched to the
perf-tools-branch and tried to build from there, without first removing
the old build, it fails:

  CLANG   /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/.tmp/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.o
util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:15: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'struct timespec64'
  329 |         __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
      |                      ^     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:29: note: forward declaration of 'struct timespec64'
  329 |         __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
      |                                    ^
1 error generated.
make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:1161: /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/.tmp/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [Makefile.perf:264: sub-make] Error 2


Because it will use what was installed before in the build dir:

[acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$ ls -la /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/vmlinux.h 
-rw-r--r--. 1 acme acme 4319 Feb 23 14:59 /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/vmlinux.h
[acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$

And that one doesn't have 'struct timespec64':

[acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$ grep timespec64 /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/vmlinux.h 
[acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$

If I remove that directory contents:

[acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$ rm -rf /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/
[acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$ mkdir /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/
[acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$

And then try to build again:

make -k O=/tmp/build/perf-tools-next/ -C tools/perf install-bin

It works.

I reproduced the problem on x86_64, so, on this transition period, the
problem happens, probably we need to robustify the installation of
tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/vmlinux/vmlinux.h in the O= target directory,
but if you just make sure the build directory is clean before trying to
build it, this time, it should work, wdyt?

Ian, ideas?

- Arnaldo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [solved] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree
  2024-02-23 20:11   ` [solved] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
@ 2024-02-23 20:34     ` Namhyung Kim
  2024-02-24 15:05       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-02-23 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Ian Rogers, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Linux Next Mailing List

Hi Arnaldo,

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:11 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:50:47PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:06:56AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the perf tree, today's linux-next build (native perf)
> > > failed like this:
> > >
> > > util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:15: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'struct timespec64'
> > >         __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
> > >                      ^     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:29: note: forward declaration of 'struct timespec64'
> > >         __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
> > >                                    ^
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > >   29d16de26df1 ("perf augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf: Move 'struct timespec64' to vmlinux.h")
> > >
> > > This is a ppc64 le build.
> > >
> > > I have used the perf tree from next-20240221 for today.
> >
> > Ok, finally I managed to secure a ppc64 machine to test this and
> > sometimes I reproduce just like you reported, but sometimes I can't do
> > it, didn't manage to isolate what is that makes it fail sometimes, make
> > -C tools/perf clean, nuking the O= target directory, etc, when I
> > reproduce it:
>
> So I think I see the problem, I now left the build directory with a
> previous build from torvalds/master, then switched to the
> perf-tools-branch and tried to build from there, without first removing
> the old build, it fails:
>
>   CLANG   /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/.tmp/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.o
> util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:15: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'struct timespec64'
>   329 |         __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
>       |                      ^     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:29: note: forward declaration of 'struct timespec64'
>   329 |         __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
>       |                                    ^
> 1 error generated.
> make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:1161: /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/.tmp/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [Makefile.perf:264: sub-make] Error 2
>
>
> Because it will use what was installed before in the build dir:
>
> [acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$ ls -la /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/vmlinux.h
> -rw-r--r--. 1 acme acme 4319 Feb 23 14:59 /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/vmlinux.h
> [acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$
>
> And that one doesn't have 'struct timespec64':
>
> [acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$ grep timespec64 /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/vmlinux.h
> [acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$
>
> If I remove that directory contents:
>
> [acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$ rm -rf /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/
> [acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$ mkdir /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/
> [acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$
>
> And then try to build again:
>
> make -k O=/tmp/build/perf-tools-next/ -C tools/perf install-bin
>
> It works.
>
> I reproduced the problem on x86_64, so, on this transition period, the
> problem happens, probably we need to robustify the installation of
> tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/vmlinux/vmlinux.h in the O= target directory,
> but if you just make sure the build directory is clean before trying to
> build it, this time, it should work, wdyt?

Can we add a dependency to the minimal vmlinux.h?

Thanks,
Namhyung

---8<---
diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
index 3cecd51b2397..33621114135e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
+++ b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
@@ -1147,7 +1147,7 @@ ifeq ($(VMLINUX_H),)
   endif
 endif

-$(SKEL_OUT)/vmlinux.h: $(VMLINUX_BTF) $(BPFTOOL)
+$(SKEL_OUT)/vmlinux.h: $(VMLINUX_BTF) $(BPFTOOL) $(VMLINUX_H)
 ifeq ($(VMLINUX_H),)
        $(QUIET_GEN)$(BPFTOOL) btf dump file $< format c > $@
 else

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [solved] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree
  2024-02-23 20:34     ` Namhyung Kim
@ 2024-02-24 15:05       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2024-02-24 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Namhyung Kim
  Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Ian Rogers, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Linux Next Mailing List

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:34:40PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Arnaldo,
> 
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:11 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:50:47PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:06:56AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > After merging the perf tree, today's linux-next build (native perf)
> > > > failed like this:
> > > >
> > > > util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:15: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'struct timespec64'
> > > >         __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
> > > >                      ^     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:29: note: forward declaration of 'struct timespec64'
> > > >         __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
> > > >                                    ^
> > > >
> > > > Caused by commit
> > > >
> > > >   29d16de26df1 ("perf augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf: Move 'struct timespec64' to vmlinux.h")
> > > >
> > > > This is a ppc64 le build.
> > > >
> > > > I have used the perf tree from next-20240221 for today.
> > >
> > > Ok, finally I managed to secure a ppc64 machine to test this and
> > > sometimes I reproduce just like you reported, but sometimes I can't do
> > > it, didn't manage to isolate what is that makes it fail sometimes, make
> > > -C tools/perf clean, nuking the O= target directory, etc, when I
> > > reproduce it:
> >
> > So I think I see the problem, I now left the build directory with a
> > previous build from torvalds/master, then switched to the
> > perf-tools-branch and tried to build from there, without first removing
> > the old build, it fails:
> >
> >   CLANG   /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/.tmp/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.o
> > util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:15: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'struct timespec64'
> >   329 |         __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
> >       |                      ^     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:29: note: forward declaration of 'struct timespec64'
> >   329 |         __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
> >       |                                    ^
> > 1 error generated.
> > make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:1161: /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/.tmp/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.o] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** [Makefile.perf:264: sub-make] Error 2
> >
> >
> > Because it will use what was installed before in the build dir:
> >
> > [acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$ ls -la /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/vmlinux.h
> > -rw-r--r--. 1 acme acme 4319 Feb 23 14:59 /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/vmlinux.h
> > [acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$
> >
> > And that one doesn't have 'struct timespec64':
> >
> > [acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$ grep timespec64 /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/vmlinux.h
> > [acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$
> >
> > If I remove that directory contents:
> >
> > [acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$ rm -rf /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/
> > [acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$ mkdir /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/
> > [acme@ibm-p9z-16-lp5 perf-tools-next]$
> >
> > And then try to build again:
> >
> > make -k O=/tmp/build/perf-tools-next/ -C tools/perf install-bin
> >
> > It works.
> >
> > I reproduced the problem on x86_64, so, on this transition period, the
> > problem happens, probably we need to robustify the installation of
> > tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/vmlinux/vmlinux.h in the O= target directory,
> > but if you just make sure the build directory is clean before trying to
> > build it, this time, it should work, wdyt?
> 
> Can we add a dependency to the minimal vmlinux.h?

That fixes it, I'll submit a formal patch

- Arnaldo
 
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
> 
> ---8<---
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> index 3cecd51b2397..33621114135e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> @@ -1147,7 +1147,7 @@ ifeq ($(VMLINUX_H),)
>    endif
>  endif
> 
> -$(SKEL_OUT)/vmlinux.h: $(VMLINUX_BTF) $(BPFTOOL)
> +$(SKEL_OUT)/vmlinux.h: $(VMLINUX_BTF) $(BPFTOOL) $(VMLINUX_H)
>  ifeq ($(VMLINUX_H),)
>         $(QUIET_GEN)$(BPFTOOL) btf dump file $< format c > $@
>  else

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-24 15:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-21 23:06 linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-23 19:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-02-23 20:11   ` [solved] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-02-23 20:34     ` Namhyung Kim
2024-02-24 15:05       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).