linux-nvdimm.lists.01.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, virtio-fs@redhat.com,
	miklos@szeredi.hu, stefanha@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com,
	mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/20] fuse,virtiofs: Add logic to free up a memory range
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:09:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200326000904.GA34937@rsjd01523.et2sqa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200304165845.3081-21-vgoyal@redhat.com>

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 11:58:45AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Add logic to free up a busy memory range. Freed memory range will be
> returned to free pool. Add a worker which can be started to select
> and free some busy memory ranges.
> 
> Process can also steal one of its busy dax ranges if free range is not
> available. I will refer it to as direct reclaim.
> 
> If free range is not available and nothing can't be stolen from same
> inode, caller waits on a waitq for free range to become available.
> 
> For reclaiming a range, as of now we need to hold following locks in
> specified order.
> 
> 	down_write(&fi->i_mmap_sem);
> 	down_write(&fi->i_dmap_sem);
> 
> We look for a free range in following order.
> 
> A. Try to get a free range.
> B. If not, try direct reclaim.
> C. If not, wait for a memory range to become free
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  fs/fuse/file.c   | 450 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  fs/fuse/fuse_i.h |  25 +++
>  fs/fuse/inode.c  |   5 +
>  3 files changed, 473 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
> index 8b264fcb9b3c..61ae2ddeef55 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>  
>  #include "fuse_i.h"
>  
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/pagemap.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> @@ -37,6 +38,8 @@ static struct page **fuse_pages_alloc(unsigned int npages, gfp_t flags,
>  	return pages;
>  }
>  
> +static struct fuse_dax_mapping *alloc_dax_mapping_reclaim(struct fuse_conn *fc,
> +				struct inode *inode, bool fault);
>  static int fuse_send_open(struct fuse_conn *fc, u64 nodeid, struct file *file,
>  			  int opcode, struct fuse_open_out *outargp)
>  {
> @@ -193,6 +196,28 @@ static void fuse_link_write_file(struct file *file)
>  	spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
>  }
>  
> +static void
> +__kick_dmap_free_worker(struct fuse_conn *fc, unsigned long delay_ms)
> +{
> +	unsigned long free_threshold;
> +
> +	/* If number of free ranges are below threshold, start reclaim */
> +	free_threshold = max((fc->nr_ranges * FUSE_DAX_RECLAIM_THRESHOLD)/100,
> +				(unsigned long)1);
> +	if (fc->nr_free_ranges < free_threshold) {
> +		pr_debug("fuse: Kicking dax memory reclaim worker. nr_free_ranges=0x%ld nr_total_ranges=%ld\n", fc->nr_free_ranges, fc->nr_ranges);
> +		queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &fc->dax_free_work,
> +				   msecs_to_jiffies(delay_ms));
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void kick_dmap_free_worker(struct fuse_conn *fc, unsigned long delay_ms)
> +{
> +	spin_lock(&fc->lock);
> +	__kick_dmap_free_worker(fc, delay_ms);
> +	spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
> +}
> +
>  static struct fuse_dax_mapping *alloc_dax_mapping(struct fuse_conn *fc)
>  {
>  	struct fuse_dax_mapping *dmap = NULL;
> @@ -201,7 +226,7 @@ static struct fuse_dax_mapping *alloc_dax_mapping(struct fuse_conn *fc)
>  
>  	if (fc->nr_free_ranges <= 0) {
>  		spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
> -		return NULL;
> +		goto out_kick;
>  	}
>  
>  	WARN_ON(list_empty(&fc->free_ranges));
> @@ -212,6 +237,9 @@ static struct fuse_dax_mapping *alloc_dax_mapping(struct fuse_conn *fc)
>  	list_del_init(&dmap->list);
>  	fc->nr_free_ranges--;
>  	spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
> +
> +out_kick:
> +	kick_dmap_free_worker(fc, 0);
>  	return dmap;
>  }
>  
> @@ -238,6 +266,7 @@ static void __dmap_add_to_free_pool(struct fuse_conn *fc,
>  {
>  	list_add_tail(&dmap->list, &fc->free_ranges);
>  	fc->nr_free_ranges++;
> +	wake_up(&fc->dax_range_waitq);
>  }
>  
>  static void dmap_add_to_free_pool(struct fuse_conn *fc,
> @@ -289,6 +318,12 @@ static int fuse_setup_one_mapping(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
>  
>  	dmap->writable = writable;
>  	if (!upgrade) {
> +		/*
> +		 * We don't take a refernce on inode. inode is valid right now
> +		 * and when inode is going away, cleanup logic should first
> +		 * cleanup dmap entries.
> +		 */
> +		dmap->inode = inode;
>  		dmap->start = offset;
>  		dmap->end = offset + FUSE_DAX_MEM_RANGE_SZ - 1;
>  		/* Protected by fi->i_dmap_sem */
> @@ -368,6 +403,7 @@ static void dmap_reinit_add_to_free_pool(struct fuse_conn *fc,
>  		 "window_offset=0x%llx length=0x%llx\n", dmap->start,
>  		 dmap->end, dmap->window_offset, dmap->length);
>  	__dmap_remove_busy_list(fc, dmap);
> +	dmap->inode = NULL;
>  	dmap->start = dmap->end = 0;
>  	__dmap_add_to_free_pool(fc, dmap);
>  }
> @@ -386,7 +422,8 @@ static void inode_reclaim_dmap_range(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct inode *inode,
>  	int err, num = 0;
>  	LIST_HEAD(to_remove);
>  
> -	pr_debug("fuse: %s: start=0x%llx, end=0x%llx\n", __func__, start, end);
> +	pr_debug("fuse: %s: inode=0x%px start=0x%llx, end=0x%llx\n", __func__,
> +		 inode, start, end);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Interval tree search matches intersecting entries. Adjust the range
> @@ -400,6 +437,8 @@ static void inode_reclaim_dmap_range(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct inode *inode,
>  							 end);
>  		if (!dmap)
>  			break;
> +		/* inode is going away. There should not be any users of dmap */
> +		WARN_ON(refcount_read(&dmap->refcnt) > 1);
>  		fuse_dax_interval_tree_remove(dmap, &fi->dmap_tree);
>  		num++;
>  		list_add(&dmap->list, &to_remove);
> @@ -434,6 +473,21 @@ static void inode_reclaim_dmap_range(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct inode *inode,
>  	spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
>  }
>  
> +static int dmap_removemapping_one(struct inode *inode,
> +				  struct fuse_dax_mapping *dmap)
> +{
> +	struct fuse_removemapping_one forget_one;
> +	struct fuse_removemapping_in inarg;
> +
> +	memset(&inarg, 0, sizeof(inarg));
> +	inarg.count = 1;
> +	memset(&forget_one, 0, sizeof(forget_one));
> +	forget_one.moffset = dmap->window_offset;
> +	forget_one.len = dmap->length;
> +
> +	return fuse_send_removemapping(inode, &inarg, &forget_one);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * It is called from evict_inode() and by that time inode is going away. So
>   * this function does not take any locks like fi->i_dmap_sem for traversing
> @@ -1903,6 +1957,17 @@ static void fuse_fill_iomap(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length,
>  		if (flags & IOMAP_FAULT)
>  			iomap->length = ALIGN(len, PAGE_SIZE);
>  		iomap->type = IOMAP_MAPPED;
> +		/*
> +		 * increace refcnt so that reclaim code knows this dmap is in
> +		 * use. This assumes i_dmap_sem mutex is held either
> +		 * shared/exclusive.
> +		 */
> +		refcount_inc(&dmap->refcnt);
> +
> +		/* iomap->private should be NULL */
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(iomap->private);
> +		iomap->private = dmap;
> +
>  		pr_debug("%s: returns iomap: addr 0x%llx offset 0x%llx"
>  				" length 0x%llx\n", __func__, iomap->addr,
>  				iomap->offset, iomap->length);
> @@ -1925,8 +1990,12 @@ static int iomap_begin_setup_new_mapping(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos,
>  	int ret;
>  	bool writable = flags & IOMAP_WRITE;
>  
> -	alloc_dmap = alloc_dax_mapping(fc);
> -	if (!alloc_dmap)
> +	alloc_dmap = alloc_dax_mapping_reclaim(fc, inode, flags & IOMAP_FAULT);
> +	if (IS_ERR(alloc_dmap))
> +		return PTR_ERR(alloc_dmap);
> +
> +	/* If we are here, we should have memory allocated */
> +	if (WARN_ON(!alloc_dmap))
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -1979,14 +2048,25 @@ static int iomap_begin_upgrade_mapping(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos,
>  	dmap = fuse_dax_interval_tree_iter_first(&fi->dmap_tree, pos, pos);
>  
>  	/* We are holding either inode lock or i_mmap_sem, and that should
> -	 * ensure that dmap can't reclaimed or truncated and it should still
> -	 * be there in tree despite the fact we dropped and re-acquired the
> -	 * lock.
> +	 * ensure that dmap can't be truncated. We are holding a reference
> +	 * on dmap and that should make sure it can't be reclaimed. So dmap
> +	 * should still be there in tree despite the fact we dropped and
> +	 * re-acquired the i_dmap_sem lock.
>  	 */
>  	ret = -EIO;
>  	if (WARN_ON(!dmap))
>  		goto out_err;
>  
> +	/* We took an extra reference on dmap to make sure its not reclaimd.
> +	 * Now we hold i_dmap_sem lock and that reference is not needed
> +	 * anymore. Drop it.
> +	 */
> +	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&dmap->refcnt)) {
> +		/* refcount should not hit 0. This object only goes
> +		 * away when fuse connection goes away */
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> +	}
> +
>  	/* Maybe another thread already upgraded mapping while we were not
>  	 * holding lock.
>  	 */
> @@ -2056,7 +2136,11 @@ static int fuse_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length,
>  			 * two threads to be trying to this simultaneously
>  			 * for same dmap. So drop shared lock and acquire
>  			 * exclusive lock.
> +			 *
> +			 * Before dropping i_dmap_sem lock, take reference
> +			 * on dmap so that its not freed by range reclaim.
>  			 */
> +			refcount_inc(&dmap->refcnt);
>  			up_read(&fi->i_dmap_sem);
>  			pr_debug("%s: Upgrading mapping at offset 0x%llx"
>  				 " length 0x%llx\n", __func__, pos, length);
> @@ -2092,6 +2176,16 @@ static int fuse_iomap_end(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length,
>  			  ssize_t written, unsigned flags,
>  			  struct iomap *iomap)
>  {
> +	struct fuse_dax_mapping *dmap = iomap->private;
> +
> +	if (dmap) {
> +		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&dmap->refcnt)) {
> +			/* refcount should not hit 0. This object only goes
> +			 * away when fuse connection goes away */
> +			WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	/* DAX writes beyond end-of-file aren't handled using iomap, so the
>  	 * file size is unchanged and there is nothing to do here.
>  	 */
> @@ -4103,3 +4197,345 @@ void fuse_init_file_inode(struct inode *inode)
>  		inode->i_data.a_ops = &fuse_dax_file_aops;
>  	}
>  }
> +
> +static int dmap_writeback_invalidate(struct inode *inode,
> +				     struct fuse_dax_mapping *dmap)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = filemap_fdatawrite_range(inode->i_mapping, dmap->start,
> +				       dmap->end);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		printk("filemap_fdatawrite_range() failed. err=%d start=0x%llx,"
> +			" end=0x%llx\n", ret, dmap->start, dmap->end);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = invalidate_inode_pages2_range(inode->i_mapping,
> +					    dmap->start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> +					    dmap->end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> +	if (ret)
> +		printk("invalidate_inode_pages2_range() failed err=%d\n", ret);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int reclaim_one_dmap_locked(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct inode *inode,
> +				   struct fuse_dax_mapping *dmap)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * igrab() was done to make sure inode won't go under us, and this
> +	 * further avoids the race with evict().
> +	 */
> +	ret = dmap_writeback_invalidate(inode, dmap);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* Remove dax mapping from inode interval tree now */
> +	fuse_dax_interval_tree_remove(dmap, &fi->dmap_tree);
> +	fi->nr_dmaps--;
> +
> +	/* It is possible that umount/shutodwn has killed the fuse connection
> +	 * and worker thread is trying to reclaim memory in parallel. So check
> +	 * if connection is still up or not otherwise don't send removemapping
> +	 * message.
> +	 */
> +	if (fc->connected) {
> +		ret = dmap_removemapping_one(inode, dmap);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			pr_warn("Failed to remove mapping. offset=0x%llx"
> +				" len=0x%llx ret=%d\n", dmap->window_offset,
> +				dmap->length, ret);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void fuse_wait_dax_page(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> +
> +        up_write(&fi->i_mmap_sem);
> +        schedule();
> +        down_write(&fi->i_mmap_sem);
> +}
> +
> +/* Should be called with fi->i_mmap_sem lock held exclusively */
> +static int __fuse_break_dax_layouts(struct inode *inode, bool *retry,
> +				    loff_t start, loff_t end)
> +{
> +	struct page *page;
> +
> +	page = dax_layout_busy_page_range(inode->i_mapping, start, end);
> +	if (!page)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	*retry = true;
> +	return ___wait_var_event(&page->_refcount,
> +			atomic_read(&page->_refcount) == 1, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
> +			0, 0, fuse_wait_dax_page(inode));
> +}
> +
> +/* dmap_end == 0 leads to unmapping of whole file */
> +static int fuse_break_dax_layouts(struct inode *inode, u64 dmap_start,
> +				  u64 dmap_end)
> +{
> +	bool	retry;
> +	int	ret;
> +
> +	do {
> +		retry = false;
> +		ret = __fuse_break_dax_layouts(inode, &retry, dmap_start,
> +					       dmap_end);
> +        } while (ret == 0 && retry);
> +
> +        return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/* Find first mapping in the tree and free it. */
> +static struct fuse_dax_mapping *
> +inode_reclaim_one_dmap_locked(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> +	struct fuse_dax_mapping *dmap;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	for (dmap = fuse_dax_interval_tree_iter_first(&fi->dmap_tree, 0, -1);
> +	     dmap;
> +	     dmap = fuse_dax_interval_tree_iter_next(dmap, 0, -1)) {
> +		/* still in use. */
> +		if (refcount_read(&dmap->refcnt) > 1)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		ret = reclaim_one_dmap_locked(fc, inode, dmap);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> +		/* Clean up dmap. Do not add back to free list */
> +		dmap_remove_busy_list(fc, dmap);
> +		dmap->inode = NULL;
> +		dmap->start = dmap->end = 0;
> +
> +		pr_debug("fuse: %s: reclaimed memory range. inode=%px,"
> +			 " window_offset=0x%llx, length=0x%llx\n", __func__,
> +			 inode, dmap->window_offset, dmap->length);
> +		return dmap;
> +	}
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Find first mapping in the tree and free it and return it. Do not add
> + * it back to free pool. If fault == true, this function should be called
> + * with fi->i_mmap_sem held.
> + */
> +static struct fuse_dax_mapping *inode_reclaim_one_dmap(struct fuse_conn *fc,
> +							 struct inode *inode,
> +							 bool fault)
> +{
> +	struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> +	struct fuse_dax_mapping *dmap;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!fault)
> +		down_write(&fi->i_mmap_sem);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Make sure there are no references to inode pages using
> +	 * get_user_pages()
> +	 */
> +	ret = fuse_break_dax_layouts(inode, 0, 0);

Hi Vivek,

This patch is enabling inline reclaim for fault path, but fault path
has already holds a locked exceptional entry which I believe the above
fuse_break_dax_layouts() needs to wait for, can you please elaborate
on how this can be avoided?

thanks,
liubo


> +	if (ret) {
> +		printk("virtio_fs: fuse_break_dax_layouts() failed. err=%d\n",
> +		       ret);
> +		dmap = ERR_PTR(ret);
> +		goto out_mmap_sem;
> +	}
> +	down_write(&fi->i_dmap_sem);
> +	dmap = inode_reclaim_one_dmap_locked(fc, inode);
> +	up_write(&fi->i_dmap_sem);
> +out_mmap_sem:
> +	if (!fault)
> +		up_write(&fi->i_mmap_sem);
> +	return dmap;
> +}
> +
> +/* If fault == true, it should be called with fi->i_mmap_sem locked */
> +static struct fuse_dax_mapping *alloc_dax_mapping_reclaim(struct fuse_conn *fc,
> +					struct inode *inode, bool fault)
> +{
> +	struct fuse_dax_mapping *dmap;
> +	struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> +
> +	while(1) {
> +		dmap = alloc_dax_mapping(fc);
> +		if (dmap)
> +			return dmap;
> +
> +		if (fi->nr_dmaps) {
> +			dmap = inode_reclaim_one_dmap(fc, inode, fault);
> +			if (dmap)
> +				return dmap;
> +			/* If we could not reclaim a mapping because it
> +			 * had a reference, that should be a temporary
> +			 * situation. Try again.
> +			 */
> +			msleep(1);
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +		/*
> +		 * There are no mappings which can be reclaimed.
> +		 * Wait for one.
> +		 */
> +		if (!(fc->nr_free_ranges > 0)) {
> +			if (wait_event_killable_exclusive(fc->dax_range_waitq,
> +					(fc->nr_free_ranges > 0)))
> +				return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static int lookup_and_reclaim_dmap_locked(struct fuse_conn *fc,
> +					  struct inode *inode, u64 dmap_start)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> +	struct fuse_dax_mapping *dmap;
> +
> +	/* Find fuse dax mapping at file offset inode. */
> +	dmap = fuse_dax_interval_tree_iter_first(&fi->dmap_tree, dmap_start,
> +						 dmap_start);
> +
> +	/* Range already got cleaned up by somebody else */
> +	if (!dmap)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* still in use. */
> +	if (refcount_read(&dmap->refcnt) > 1)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	ret = reclaim_one_dmap_locked(fc, inode, dmap);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* Cleanup dmap entry and add back to free list */
> +	spin_lock(&fc->lock);
> +	dmap_reinit_add_to_free_pool(fc, dmap);
> +	spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Free a range of memory.
> + * Locking.
> + * 1. Take fuse_inode->i_mmap_sem to block dax faults.
> + * 2. Take fuse_inode->i_dmap_sem to protect interval tree and also to make
> + *    sure read/write can not reuse a dmap which we might be freeing.
> + */
> +static int lookup_and_reclaim_dmap(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct inode *inode,
> +				   u64 dmap_start, u64 dmap_end)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> +
> +	down_write(&fi->i_mmap_sem);
> +	ret = fuse_break_dax_layouts(inode, dmap_start, dmap_end);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		printk("virtio_fs: fuse_break_dax_layouts() failed. err=%d\n",
> +		       ret);
> +		goto out_mmap_sem;
> +	}
> +
> +	down_write(&fi->i_dmap_sem);
> +	ret = lookup_and_reclaim_dmap_locked(fc, inode, dmap_start);
> +	up_write(&fi->i_dmap_sem);
> +out_mmap_sem:
> +	up_write(&fi->i_mmap_sem);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int try_to_free_dmap_chunks(struct fuse_conn *fc,
> +				   unsigned long nr_to_free)
> +{
> +	struct fuse_dax_mapping *dmap, *pos, *temp;
> +	int ret, nr_freed = 0;
> +	u64 dmap_start = 0, window_offset = 0, dmap_end = 0;
> +	struct inode *inode = NULL;
> +
> +	/* Pick first busy range and free it for now*/
> +	while(1) {
> +		if (nr_freed >= nr_to_free)
> +			break;
> +
> +		dmap = NULL;
> +		spin_lock(&fc->lock);
> +
> +		if (!fc->nr_busy_ranges) {
> +			spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +
> +		list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, temp, &fc->busy_ranges,
> +						busy_list) {
> +			/* skip this range if it's in use. */
> +			if (refcount_read(&pos->refcnt) > 1)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			inode = igrab(pos->inode);
> +			/*
> +			 * This inode is going away. That will free
> +			 * up all the ranges anyway, continue to
> +			 * next range.
> +			 */
> +			if (!inode)
> +				continue;
> +			/*
> +			 * Take this element off list and add it tail. If
> +			 * this element can't be freed, it will help with
> +			 * selecting new element in next iteration of loop.
> +			 */
> +			dmap = pos;
> +			list_move_tail(&dmap->busy_list, &fc->busy_ranges);
> +			dmap_start = dmap->start;
> +			dmap_end = dmap->end;
> +			window_offset = dmap->window_offset;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
> +		if (!dmap)
> +			return 0;
> +
> +		ret = lookup_and_reclaim_dmap(fc, inode, dmap_start, dmap_end);
> +		iput(inode);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			printk("%s(window_offset=0x%llx) failed. err=%d\n",
> +				__func__, window_offset, ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +		nr_freed++;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void fuse_dax_free_mem_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct fuse_conn *fc = container_of(work, struct fuse_conn,
> +						dax_free_work.work);
> +	pr_debug("fuse: Worker to free memory called. nr_free_ranges=%lu"
> +		 " nr_busy_ranges=%lu\n", fc->nr_free_ranges,
> +		 fc->nr_busy_ranges);
> +
> +	ret = try_to_free_dmap_chunks(fc, FUSE_DAX_RECLAIM_CHUNK);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		pr_debug("fuse: try_to_free_dmap_chunks() failed with err=%d\n",
> +			 ret);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* If number of free ranges are still below threhold, requeue */
> +	kick_dmap_free_worker(fc, 1);
> +}
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> index de213a7e1b0e..41c2fbff0d37 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> +++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,16 @@
>  #define FUSE_DAX_MEM_RANGE_SZ	(2*1024*1024)
>  #define FUSE_DAX_MEM_RANGE_PAGES	(FUSE_DAX_MEM_RANGE_SZ/PAGE_SIZE)
>  
> +/* Number of ranges reclaimer will try to free in one invocation */
> +#define FUSE_DAX_RECLAIM_CHUNK		(10)
> +
> +/*
> + * Dax memory reclaim threshold in percetage of total ranges. When free
> + * number of free ranges drops below this threshold, reclaim can trigger
> + * Default is 20%
> + * */
> +#define FUSE_DAX_RECLAIM_THRESHOLD	(20)
> +
>  /** List of active connections */
>  extern struct list_head fuse_conn_list;
>  
> @@ -75,6 +85,9 @@ struct fuse_forget_link {
>  
>  /** Translation information for file offsets to DAX window offsets */
>  struct fuse_dax_mapping {
> +	/* Pointer to inode where this memory range is mapped */
> +	struct inode *inode;
> +
>  	/* Will connect in fc->free_ranges to keep track of free memory */
>  	struct list_head list;
>  
> @@ -97,6 +110,9 @@ struct fuse_dax_mapping {
>  
>  	/* Is this mapping read-only or read-write */
>  	bool writable;
> +
> +	/* reference count when the mapping is used by dax iomap. */
> +	refcount_t refcnt;
>  };
>  
>  /** FUSE inode */
> @@ -822,11 +838,19 @@ struct fuse_conn {
>  	unsigned long nr_busy_ranges;
>  	struct list_head busy_ranges;
>  
> +	/* Worker to free up memory ranges */
> +	struct delayed_work dax_free_work;
> +
> +	/* Wait queue for a dax range to become free */
> +	wait_queue_head_t dax_range_waitq;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * DAX Window Free Ranges
>  	 */
>  	long nr_free_ranges;
>  	struct list_head free_ranges;
> +
> +	unsigned long nr_ranges;
>  };
>  
>  static inline struct fuse_conn *get_fuse_conn_super(struct super_block *sb)
> @@ -1164,6 +1188,7 @@ unsigned int fuse_len_args(unsigned int numargs, struct fuse_arg *args);
>   */
>  u64 fuse_get_unique(struct fuse_iqueue *fiq);
>  void fuse_free_conn(struct fuse_conn *fc);
> +void fuse_dax_free_mem_worker(struct work_struct *work);
>  void fuse_cleanup_inode_mappings(struct inode *inode);
>  
>  #endif /* _FS_FUSE_I_H */
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> index d4770e7fb7eb..3560b62077a7 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> @@ -663,11 +663,13 @@ static int fuse_dax_mem_range_init(struct fuse_conn *fc,
>  		range->window_offset = i * FUSE_DAX_MEM_RANGE_SZ;
>  		range->length = FUSE_DAX_MEM_RANGE_SZ;
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&range->busy_list);
> +		refcount_set(&range->refcnt, 1);
>  		list_add_tail(&range->list, &mem_ranges);
>  	}
>  
>  	list_replace_init(&mem_ranges, &fc->free_ranges);
>  	fc->nr_free_ranges = nr_ranges;
> +	fc->nr_ranges = nr_ranges;
>  	return 0;
>  out_err:
>  	/* Free All allocated elements */
> @@ -692,6 +694,7 @@ void fuse_conn_init(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct user_namespace *user_ns,
>  	refcount_set(&fc->count, 1);
>  	atomic_set(&fc->dev_count, 1);
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&fc->blocked_waitq);
> +	init_waitqueue_head(&fc->dax_range_waitq);
>  	fuse_iqueue_init(&fc->iq, fiq_ops, fiq_priv);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fc->bg_queue);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fc->entry);
> @@ -711,6 +714,7 @@ void fuse_conn_init(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct user_namespace *user_ns,
>  	fc->max_pages = FUSE_DEFAULT_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fc->free_ranges);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fc->busy_ranges);
> +	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&fc->dax_free_work, fuse_dax_free_mem_worker);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_conn_init);
>  
> @@ -719,6 +723,7 @@ void fuse_conn_put(struct fuse_conn *fc)
>  	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&fc->count)) {
>  		struct fuse_iqueue *fiq = &fc->iq;
>  
> +		flush_delayed_work(&fc->dax_free_work);
>  		if (fc->dax_dev)
>  			fuse_free_dax_mem_ranges(&fc->free_ranges);
>  		if (fiq->ops->release)
> -- 
> 2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-26  0:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-04 16:58 [PATCH 00/20] virtiofs: Add DAX support Vivek Goyal
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 01/20] dax: Modify bdev_dax_pgoff() to handle NULL bdev Vivek Goyal
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 02/20] dax: Create a range version of dax_layout_busy_page() Vivek Goyal
2020-03-10 15:19   ` Ira Weiny
2020-03-10 20:29     ` Vivek Goyal
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 03/20] virtio: Add get_shm_region method Vivek Goyal
2020-03-10 10:53   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 04/20] virtio: Implement get_shm_region for PCI transport Vivek Goyal
2020-03-10 11:04   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-03-10 18:19     ` Vivek Goyal
2020-03-11 17:34       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-03-11 19:29         ` Vivek Goyal
2020-03-10 11:12   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-03-10 18:47     ` Vivek Goyal
2020-03-10 21:27       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 05/20] virtio: Implement get_shm_region for MMIO transport Vivek Goyal
2020-03-10 11:06   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 06/20] virtiofs: Provide a helper function for virtqueue initialization Vivek Goyal
2020-03-10 14:10   ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 07/20] fuse: Get rid of no_mount_options Vivek Goyal
2020-03-10 14:12   ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 08/20] fuse,virtiofs: Add a mount option to enable dax Vivek Goyal
2020-03-10 14:16   ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 09/20] virtio_fs, dax: Set up virtio_fs dax_device Vivek Goyal
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 10/20] fuse,virtiofs: Keep a list of free dax memory ranges Vivek Goyal
2020-03-10 19:29   ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 11/20] fuse: implement FUSE_INIT map_alignment field Vivek Goyal
2020-03-10 19:31   ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 12/20] fuse: Introduce setupmapping/removemapping commands Vivek Goyal
2020-03-10 19:49   ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-03-10 20:33     ` Vivek Goyal
2020-03-11  7:03       ` Amir Goldstein
2020-03-11 14:19         ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-03-11 14:41           ` Vivek Goyal
2020-03-11 15:12             ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 13/20] fuse, dax: Implement dax read/write operations Vivek Goyal
2020-03-12  9:43   ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-03-12 16:02     ` Vivek Goyal
2020-03-13 10:18       ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-03-13 13:41         ` Vivek Goyal
2020-04-04  0:25   ` Liu Bo
2020-04-14 12:54     ` Vivek Goyal
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 14/20] fuse,dax: add DAX mmap support Vivek Goyal
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 15/20] fuse, dax: Take ->i_mmap_sem lock during dax page fault Vivek Goyal
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 16/20] fuse,virtiofs: Define dax address space operations Vivek Goyal
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 17/20] fuse,virtiofs: Maintain a list of busy elements Vivek Goyal
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 18/20] fuse: Release file in process context Vivek Goyal
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 19/20] fuse: Take inode lock for dax inode truncation Vivek Goyal
2020-03-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 20/20] fuse,virtiofs: Add logic to free up a memory range Vivek Goyal
2020-03-11  5:16   ` Liu Bo
2020-03-11 12:59     ` Vivek Goyal
2020-03-11 17:24       ` Liu Bo
2020-03-26  0:09   ` Liu Bo [this message]
2020-03-27 14:01     ` Vivek Goyal
2020-03-27 22:06       ` Liu Bo
2020-04-14 19:30         ` Vivek Goyal
2020-04-15 17:22           ` Liu Bo
2020-04-16 19:05             ` Vivek Goyal
2020-04-17 18:05               ` Liu Bo
2020-03-11  5:22 ` [PATCH 00/20] virtiofs: Add DAX support Amir Goldstein
2020-03-11 13:09   ` Vivek Goyal
2020-03-11 18:48   ` Vivek Goyal
2020-03-11 19:32     ` Amir Goldstein
2020-03-11 19:39       ` Vivek Goyal
2020-03-11 13:38 ` Patrick Ohly
2020-03-16 13:02   ` Vivek Goyal
2020-03-17  8:28     ` Patrick Ohly

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200326000904.GA34937@rsjd01523.et2sqa \
    --to=bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).