From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] nvme: Add support for ACRE Command Interrupted status
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:26:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <04835a2e-1769-36c9-63b8-173f247c862b@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191203210015.GA2691@redsun51.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com>
On 12/3/19 10:00 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 05:38:04PM +0000, Meneghini, John wrote:
>> This is an update to say that I've tested this patch and it works as expected.
>>
>> When the controller returns a Command Interrupted status the request is avoids nvme_failover_req()
>> and goes down the nvme_retry_req() path where the CRD is implemented and the command is
>> retried after a delay.
>>
>> If the controllers returns Command Interrupted too many times, and nvme_req(req)->retries
>> runs down, this results in a device resource error returned to the block layer. But I think we'll
>> have this problem with any error.
>
> Why is the controller returning the same error so many times? Are we
> not waiting the requested delay timed? If so, the controller told us
> retrying should be successful.
>
> It is possible we kick the requeue list early if one command error
> has a valid CRD, but a subsequent retryable command does not. Is that
> what's happening?
>
No. The problem is that CRD needs to be observed _in all cases_ whenever
we get a COMMAND INTERRUPTED status.
Currently we're only observing CRD when multipathing is _not_ active,
which is wrong.
And this is what the patch is trying to achieve.
> I'm just concerned because if we just skip counting the retry, a broken
> device could have the driver retry the same command indefinitely, which
> often leaves a task in an uninterruptible sleep state forever.
>
Oh, but we're not skipping the retries; in fact we do _enable_ retry
counting with this patch as we're skipping the nvme_failover_req()
branch and moving to nvme_retry_req().
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>> index 9696404a6182..24dc9ed1a11b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>> @@ -230,6 +230,8 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_error_status(u16 status)
>> return BLK_STS_NEXUS;
>> case NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR:
>> return BLK_STS_TRANSPORT;
>> + case NVME_SC_CMD_INTERRUPTED:
>> + return BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE;
>
> Just for the sake of keeping this change isloted to nvme, perhaps use an
> existing blk_status_t value that already maps to not path error, like
> BLK_STS_TARGET.
>
I don't mind; whichever works for you.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: Felix Imendörffer
_______________________________________________
linux-nvme mailing list
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-04 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-27 19:12 [PATCH V2] nvme: Add support for ACRE Command Interrupted status Meneghini, John
2019-12-03 17:38 ` Meneghini, John
2019-12-03 21:00 ` Keith Busch
2019-12-04 13:26 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2019-12-04 14:48 ` Meneghini, John
2019-12-04 16:07 ` Keith Busch
2019-12-04 18:33 ` Meneghini, John
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=04835a2e-1769-36c9-63b8-173f247c862b@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).