linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
	Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
	Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 12/22] PCI: enhance PCI remove logic to support PCI bus lock mechanism
Date: Wed,  8 Aug 2012 00:10:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1344355862-2726-13-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344355862-2726-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com>

This patch enhances PCI remove logic to support PCI bus lock mechanism.
It implements the major part of the PCI bus state machine.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/remove.c |  146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/remove.c b/drivers/pci/remove.c
index ba03059..a26a841 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/remove.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/remove.c
@@ -26,21 +26,25 @@ static void pci_stop_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
 		dev->is_added = 0;
 	}
 
+	/* TODO: check whether it's safe to call aspm here */
 	if (dev->bus->self)
 		pcie_aspm_exit_link_state(dev);
 }
 
 static void pci_destroy_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
-	/* Remove the device from the device lists, and prevent any further
-	 * list accesses from this device */
 	down_write(&pci_bus_sem);
-	list_del(&dev->bus_list);
-	dev->bus_list.next = dev->bus_list.prev = NULL;
-	up_write(&pci_bus_sem);
-
-	pci_free_resources(dev);
-	put_device(&dev->dev);
+	if (dev->bus_list.next == NULL) {
+		up_write(&pci_bus_sem);
+	} else {
+		/* Remove the device from the device lists, and prevent any
+		 * further list accesses from this device */
+		list_del(&dev->bus_list);
+		dev->bus_list.next = dev->bus_list.prev = NULL;
+		up_write(&pci_bus_sem);
+		pci_free_resources(dev);
+		put_device(&dev->dev);
+	}
 }
 
 /**
@@ -64,29 +68,44 @@ int pci_remove_device_safe(struct pci_dev *dev)
 
 void pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *pci_bus)
 {
-	pci_proc_detach_bus(pci_bus);
+	int state = pci_bus_get_state(pci_bus);
 
-	down_write(&pci_bus_sem);
-	list_del(&pci_bus->node);
-	pci_bus_release_busn_res(pci_bus);
-	up_write(&pci_bus_sem);
-	if (pci_bus->is_added) {
+	switch (state) {
+	case PCI_BUS_STATE_STOPPED:
+	case PCI_BUS_STATE_REGISTERED:
 		pci_remove_legacy_files(pci_bus);
 		device_del(&pci_bus->dev);
+	case PCI_BUS_STATE_STOPPING:
+	case PCI_BUS_STATE_INITIALIZED:
+		pci_proc_detach_bus(pci_bus);
+		down_write(&pci_bus_sem);
+		list_del(&pci_bus->node);
+		pci_bus_release_busn_res(pci_bus);
+		up_write(&pci_bus_sem);
+		pci_bus_change_state(pci_bus, state,
+				     PCI_BUS_STATE_REMOVED, true);
+		pci_bus_put(pci_bus);
+		break;
+	case PCI_BUS_STATE_REMOVED:
+		pci_bus_unlock(pci_bus);
+		break;
+	default:
+		BUG_ON(state);
+		break;
 	}
-	put_device(&pci_bus->dev);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_remove_bus);
 
-static void pci_remove_behind_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev);
-
 void __pci_remove_bus_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
-	if (dev->subordinate) {
-		struct pci_bus *b = dev->subordinate;
+	struct list_head *l, *n;
+	struct pci_bus *bus;
 
-		pci_remove_behind_bridge(dev);
-		pci_remove_bus(b);
+	bus = pci_lock_subordinate(dev, PCI_BUS_STATE_DESTROYED - 1);
+	if (bus) {
+		list_for_each_safe(l, n, &bus->devices)
+			__pci_remove_bus_device(pci_dev_b(l));
+		pci_remove_bus(bus);
 		dev->subordinate = NULL;
 	}
 
@@ -111,24 +130,7 @@ void pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	pci_stop_bus_device(dev);
 	__pci_remove_bus_device(dev);
 }
-
-static void pci_remove_behind_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
-{
-	struct list_head *l, *n;
-
-	if (dev->subordinate)
-		list_for_each_safe(l, n, &dev->subordinate->devices)
-			__pci_remove_bus_device(pci_dev_b(l));
-}
-
-static void pci_stop_behind_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
-{
-	struct list_head *l, *n;
-
-	if (dev->subordinate)
-		list_for_each_safe(l, n, &dev->subordinate->devices)
-			pci_stop_bus_device(pci_dev_b(l));
-}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device);
 
 /**
  * pci_stop_and_remove_behind_bridge - stop and remove all devices behind
@@ -141,27 +143,17 @@ static void pci_stop_behind_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
  */
 void pci_stop_and_remove_behind_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
-	pci_stop_behind_bridge(dev);
-	pci_remove_behind_bridge(dev);
-}
-
-static void pci_stop_bus_devices(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
 	struct list_head *l, *n;
+	struct pci_bus *bus;
 
-	/*
-	 * VFs could be removed by pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device() in the
-	 *  pci_stop_bus_devices() code path for PF.
-	 *  aka, bus->devices get updated in the process.
-	 * but VFs are inserted after PFs when SRIOV is enabled for PF,
-	 * We can iterate the list backwards to get prev valid PF instead
-	 *  of removed VF.
-	 */
-	list_for_each_prev_safe(l, n, &bus->devices) {
-		struct pci_dev *dev = pci_dev_b(l);
-		pci_stop_bus_device(dev);
+	bus = pci_lock_subordinate(dev, PCI_BUS_STATE_REMOVED - 1);
+	if (bus) {
+		list_for_each_safe(l, n, &bus->devices)
+			pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(pci_dev_b(l));
+		pci_bus_unlock(bus);
 	}
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_stop_and_remove_behind_bridge);
 
 /**
  * pci_stop_bus_device - stop a PCI device and any children
@@ -173,12 +165,44 @@ static void pci_stop_bus_devices(struct pci_bus *bus)
  */
 void pci_stop_bus_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
-	if (dev->subordinate)
-		pci_stop_bus_devices(dev->subordinate);
+	int state;
+	struct pci_bus *bus;
+	struct list_head *l, *n;
+
+	bus = pci_lock_subordinate(dev, PCI_BUS_STATE_REMOVED - 1);
+	if (!bus)
+		goto out;
+
+	state = pci_bus_get_state(bus);
+	switch (state) {
+	case PCI_BUS_STATE_INITIALIZED:
+		pci_bus_change_state(bus, state, PCI_BUS_STATE_STOPPING, true);
+		break;
+	case PCI_BUS_STATE_WORKING:
+	case PCI_BUS_STATE_REGISTERED:
+		pci_bus_change_state(bus, state, PCI_BUS_STATE_STOPPING, false);
+		/*
+		 * VFs could be removed by pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device()
+		 * in the pci_stop_bus_devices() code path for PF.
+		 * aka, bus->devices get updated in the process.
+		 * but VFs are inserted after PFs when SRIOV is enabled for PF,
+		 * We can iterate the list backwards to get prev valid PF
+		 * instead of removed VF.
+		 */
+		list_for_each_prev_safe(l, n, &bus->devices)
+			pci_stop_bus_device(pci_dev_b(l));
+		pci_bus_change_state(bus, PCI_BUS_STATE_STOPPING,
+				     PCI_BUS_STATE_STOPPED, true);
+		break;
+	case PCI_BUS_STATE_STOPPING:
+	case PCI_BUS_STATE_STOPPED:
+		pci_bus_unlock(bus);
+		break;
+	default:
+		BUG_ON(state);
+	}
 
+out:
 	pci_stop_dev(dev);
 }
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_stop_and_remove_behind_bridge);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_stop_bus_device);
-- 
1.7.9.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-07 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-07 16:10 [RFC PATCH v1 00/22] introduce PCI bus lock to serialize PCI hotplug operations Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/22] PCI: use pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() to avoid race conditions Jiang Liu
2012-09-11 22:00   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-12  8:37     ` Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/22] PCI: trivial cleanups for drivers/pci/remove.c Jiang Liu
2012-09-11 22:03   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-12  8:50     ` Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/22] PCI: change PCI device management code to better follow device model Jiang Liu
2012-09-11 22:03   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/22] PCI: split PCI bus device registration into two stages Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/22] PCI: introduce pci_bus_{get|put}() to manage PCI bus reference count Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/22] PCI: use a global lock to serialize PCI root bridge hotplug operations Jiang Liu
2012-09-11 22:57   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-12 15:42     ` Jiang Liu
2012-09-12 16:51       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-13 16:00         ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: introduce root bridge hotplug safe interfaces to walk root buses Jiang Liu
2012-09-13 17:40           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-17 15:55             ` Jiang Liu
2012-09-17 16:24               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-18 21:39                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-21 16:07                   ` [PATCH v4] PCI: introduce two interfaces to walk PCI buses Jiang Liu
2012-09-26 20:14                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-13 16:00         ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: remove host bridge hotplug unsafe interface pci_get_next_bus() Jiang Liu
2012-09-17 15:51         ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/22] PCI: use a global lock to serialize PCI root bridge hotplug operations Jiang Liu
2012-09-20 18:49         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/22] PCI: introduce PCI bus lock to serialize PCI " Jiang Liu
2012-09-11 23:24   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/22] PCI: introduce hotplug safe search interfaces for PCI bus/device Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/22] PCI: enhance PCI probe logic to support PCI bus lock mechanism Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/22] PCI: enhance PCI bus specific " Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/22] PCI: enhance PCI resource assignment " Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/22] PCI: make each PCI device hold a reference to its parent PCI bus Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/22] PCI/sysfs: use PCI bus lock to avoid race conditions Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/22] PCI/eeepc: " Jiang Liu
2012-09-11 23:18   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-12 14:24     ` [PATCH] eeepc-laptop: fix device reference count leakage in eeepc_rfkill_hotplug() Jiang Liu
2012-09-12 19:59       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/22] PCI/asus-wmi: use PCI bus lock to avoid race conditions Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/22] PCI/pciehp: " Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 18/22] PCI/acpiphp: " Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 19/22] PCI/x86: enable PCI bus lock mechanism for x86 platforms Jiang Liu
2012-09-11 23:22   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-12  9:56     ` Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:11 ` [RFC PATCH v1 20/22] PCI/IA64: enable PCI bus lock mechanism for IA64 platforms Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:11 ` [RFC PATCH v1 21/22] PCI: cleanups for PCI bus lock implementation Jiang Liu
2012-09-11 23:21   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-12  8:58     ` Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:11 ` [RFC PATCH v1 22/22] PCI: unexport pci_root_buses Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 18:11 ` [RFC PATCH v1 00/22] introduce PCI bus lock to serialize PCI hotplug operations Don Dutile
2012-08-08 15:49   ` Jiang Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1344355862-2726-13-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --to=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
    --cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).