linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Derrick, Jonathan" <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
Cc: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"kbusch@kernel.org" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	"lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"helgaas@kernel.org" <helgaas@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] PCI: vmd: Reducing tail latency by affining to the storage stack
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 07:37:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191107153736.GA16006@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bfc69a54dc394ffb7580d14818047ec6a647536f.camel@intel.com>

On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 02:12:50PM +0000, Derrick, Jonathan wrote:
> > How does this compare to simplify disabling VMD?
> 
> It's a moot point since Keith pointed out a few flaws with this set,
> however disabling VMD is not an option for users who wish to
> passthrough VMD

And why would you ever pass through vmd instead of the actual device?
That just makes things go slower and adds zero value.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-07 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-06 11:40 [PATCH 0/3] PCI: vmd: Reducing tail latency by affining to the storage stack Jon Derrick
2019-11-06 11:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: vmd: Reduce VMD vectors using NVMe calculation Jon Derrick
2019-11-06 18:02   ` Keith Busch
2019-11-06 19:51     ` Derrick, Jonathan
2019-11-06 11:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI: vmd: Align IRQ lists with child device vectors Jon Derrick
2019-11-06 18:06   ` Keith Busch
2019-11-06 20:14     ` Derrick, Jonathan
2019-11-06 11:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI: vmd: Use managed irq affinities Jon Derrick
2019-11-06 18:10   ` Keith Busch
2019-11-06 20:14     ` Derrick, Jonathan
2019-11-06 20:27       ` Keith Busch
2019-11-06 20:33         ` Derrick, Jonathan
2019-11-18 10:49           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-11-18 16:43             ` Derrick, Jonathan
2019-11-07  9:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] PCI: vmd: Reducing tail latency by affining to the storage stack Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-07 14:12   ` Derrick, Jonathan
2019-11-07 15:37     ` hch [this message]
2019-11-07 15:40       ` Derrick, Jonathan
2019-11-07 15:42         ` hch
2019-11-07 15:47           ` Derrick, Jonathan
2019-11-11 17:03             ` hch
2022-12-23  2:33 ` Kai-Heng Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191107153736.GA16006@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathan.derrick@intel.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).