From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ira Weiny" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Vishal Verma" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"Kelley, Sean V" <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org>,
Chris Browy <cbrowy@avery-design.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
<daniel.lll@alibaba-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 05/16] cxl/mem: Map memory device registers
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 19:13:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210112191342.00006aad@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210111225121.820014-6-ben.widawsky@intel.com>
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:51:09 -0800
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> All the necessary bits are initialized in order to find and map the
> register space for CXL Memory Devices. This is accomplished by using the
> Register Locator DVSEC (CXL 2.0 - 8.1.9.1) to determine which PCI BAR to
> use, and how much of an offset from that BAR should be added.
>
> If the memory device registers are found and mapped a new internal data
> structure tracking device state is allocated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Some issues with managed allocations being manually freed in remove.
It shouldn't be necessary to do that.
> ---
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 17 ++++++++
> drivers/cxl/mem.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/cxl/pci.h | 14 +++++++
> 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/cxl/cxl.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d81d0ba4617c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/* Copyright(c) 2020 Intel Corporation. */
> +
> +#ifndef __CXL_H__
> +#define __CXL_H__
> +
> +/**
> + * struct cxl_mem - A CXL memory device
> + * @pdev: The PCI device associated with this CXL device.
> + * @regs: IO mappings to the device's MMIO
> + */
> +struct cxl_mem {
> + struct pci_dev *pdev;
> + void __iomem *regs;
> +};
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.c b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> index 005404888942..8301db34d2ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,58 @@
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include "acpi.h"
> #include "pci.h"
> +#include "cxl.h"
> +
> +/**
> + * cxl_mem_create() - Create a new &struct cxl_mem.
> + * @pdev: The pci device associated with the new &struct cxl_mem.
> + * @reg_lo: Lower 32b of the register locator
> + * @reg_hi: Upper 32b of the register locator.
> + *
> + * Return: The new &struct cxl_mem on success, NULL on failure.
> + *
> + * Map the BAR for a CXL memory device. This BAR has the memory device's
> + * registers for the device as specified in CXL specification.
> + */
> +static struct cxl_mem *cxl_mem_create(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 reg_lo,
> + u32 reg_hi)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct cxl_mem *cxlm;
> + void __iomem *regs;
> + u64 offset;
> + u8 bar;
> + int rc;
> +
> + offset = ((u64)reg_hi << 32) | (reg_lo & CXL_REGLOC_ADDR_MASK);
> + bar = (reg_lo >> CXL_REGLOC_BIR_SHIFT) & CXL_REGLOC_BIR_MASK;
> +
> + /* Basic sanity check that BAR is big enough */
> + if (pci_resource_len(pdev, bar) < offset) {
> + dev_err(dev, "BAR%d: %pr: too small (offset: %#llx)\n", bar,
> + &pdev->resource[bar], (unsigned long long)offset);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + rc = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, BIT(bar), pci_name(pdev));
> + if (rc != 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to map registers\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + cxlm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cxlm), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cxlm) {
> + dev_err(dev, "No memory available\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + regs = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[bar];
> + cxlm->pdev = pdev;
> + cxlm->regs = regs + offset;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Mapped CXL Memory Device resource\n");
> + return cxlm;
> +}
>
> static int cxl_mem_dvsec(struct pci_dev *pdev, int dvsec)
> {
> @@ -33,7 +85,8 @@ static int cxl_mem_dvsec(struct pci_dev *pdev, int dvsec)
> static int cxl_mem_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - int rc, regloc;
> + struct cxl_mem *cxlm;
> + int rc, regloc, i;
>
> rc = cxl_bus_acquire(pdev);
> if (rc != 0) {
> @@ -41,15 +94,59 @@ static int cxl_mem_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> return rc;
> }
>
> + rc = pcim_enable_device(pdev);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> regloc = cxl_mem_dvsec(pdev, PCI_DVSEC_ID_CXL_REGLOC);
> if (!regloc) {
> dev_err(dev, "register location dvsec not found\n");
> return -ENXIO;
> }
> + regloc += 0xc; /* Skip DVSEC + reserved fields */
> +
> + rc = -ENXIO;
> + for (i = regloc; i < regloc + 0x24; i += 8) {
> + u32 reg_lo, reg_hi;
> + u8 reg_type;
> +
> + /* "register low and high" contain other bits */
> + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, i, ®_lo);
> + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, i + 4, ®_hi);
> +
> + reg_type =
> + (reg_lo >> CXL_REGLOC_RBI_SHIFT) & CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MASK;
> +
> + if (reg_type == CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV) {
> + rc = 0;
> + cxlm = cxl_mem_create(pdev, reg_lo, reg_hi);
> + if (!cxlm)
> + rc = -ENODEV;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
>
> + pci_set_drvdata(pdev, cxlm);
After below cleanup, not needed yet..
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void cxl_mem_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct cxl_mem *cxlm;
> +
> + cxlm = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + if (!cxlm)
> + return;
> +
> + kfree(cxlm);
There is bunch of unwinding here that I'd expect to see in error paths
for probe but it's not there... Which made me wonder.
So pcim_iounmap_regions is a managed interface, why are call it by
hand? Same is true of the allocation of cxlm above. So currently this
remove isn't doing anything useful.
> +
> + pcim_iounmap_regions(pdev, ~0);
> + pci_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
This hasn't been needed for a long time. Example of removal of similar...
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/005801ceaec1$6b8d3320$42a79960$%25han@samsung.com/
> +}
> +
> static const struct pci_device_id cxl_mem_pci_tbl[] = {
> /* PCI class code for CXL.mem Type-3 Devices */
> { PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,
> @@ -62,6 +159,7 @@ static struct pci_driver cxl_mem_driver = {
> .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> .id_table = cxl_mem_pci_tbl,
> .probe = cxl_mem_probe,
> + .remove = cxl_mem_remove,
> };
>
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.h b/drivers/cxl/pci.h
> index a8a9935fa90b..df222edb6ac3 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.h
> @@ -17,4 +17,18 @@
>
> #define PCI_DVSEC_ID_CXL_REGLOC 0x8
>
> +/* BAR Indicator Register (BIR) */
> +#define CXL_REGLOC_BIR_SHIFT 0
> +#define CXL_REGLOC_BIR_MASK 0x7
> +
> +/* Register Block Identifier (RBI) */
> +#define CXL_REGLOC_RBI_SHIFT 8
> +#define CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MASK 0xff
> +#define CXL_REGLOC_RBI_EMPTY 0
> +#define CXL_REGLOC_RBI_COMPONENT 1
> +#define CXL_REGLOC_RBI_VIRT 2
> +#define CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV 3
> +
> +#define CXL_REGLOC_ADDR_MASK 0xffff0000
> +
> #endif /* __CXL_PCI_H__ */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-12 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-11 22:51 [RFC PATCH v3 00/16] CXL 2.0 Support Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/16] docs: cxl: Add basic documentation Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/16] cxl/acpi: Add an acpi_cxl module for the CXL interconnect Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 7:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-01-12 18:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-12 19:43 ` Dan Williams
2021-01-12 22:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-13 17:55 ` Kaneda, Erik
2021-01-20 19:27 ` Dan Williams
2021-01-20 19:18 ` Verma, Vishal L
2021-01-13 12:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-01-20 19:21 ` Verma, Vishal L
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/16] cxl/acpi: add OSC support Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-01-12 18:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/16] cxl/mem: Introduce a driver for CXL-2.0-Type-3 endpoints Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 7:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-01-12 19:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-12 20:06 ` Dan Williams
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/16] cxl/mem: Map memory device registers Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 19:13 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2021-01-12 19:21 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 20:40 ` Dan Williams
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/16] cxl/mem: Find device capabilities Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 19:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-12 19:22 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/16] cxl/mem: Implement polled mode mailbox Ben Widawsky
2021-01-13 18:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-14 17:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-14 17:50 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 18:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/16] cxl/mem: Register CXL memX devices Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 16:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/16] cxl/mem: Add basic IOCTL interface Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 16:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/16] cxl/mem: Add send command Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 17:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-21 18:15 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-22 11:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-22 17:08 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/16] taint: add taint for direct hardware access Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/16] taint: add taint for unfettered " Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 3:31 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/16] cxl/mem: Add a "RAW" send command Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/16] cxl/mem: Create concept of enabled commands Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 17:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-21 18:40 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-22 11:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/16] cxl/mem: Use CEL for enabling commands Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 18:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-14 18:13 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 18:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-14 19:04 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 19:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/16] cxl/mem: Add limited Get Log command (0401h) Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 18:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-23 0:14 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/16] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainers of the CXL driver Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 1:12 ` Joe Perches
[not found] ` <0f2a6d62-09d8-416f-e972-3e9869c3e1a6@alibaba-inc.com>
2021-01-12 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/16] CXL 2.0 Support Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 16:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210112191342.00006aad@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=cbrowy@avery-design.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.lll@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jcm@jonmasters.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sean.v.kelley@intel.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).