From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Vishal Verma" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"Kelley, Sean V" <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org>,
Chris Browy <cbrowy@avery-design.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
<daniel.lll@alibaba-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 14/16] cxl/mem: Use CEL for enabling commands
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 18:32:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210114183217.0000154c@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210114181340.fgybdchzfxiiqwhr@intel.com>
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:13:40 -0800
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> On 21-01-14 18:02:11, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:51:19 -0800
> > Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The Command Effects Log (CEL) is specified in the CXL 2.0 specification.
> > > The CEL is one of two types of logs, the other being vendor specific.
> > > They are distinguished in hardware/spec via UUID. The CEL is immediately
> > > useful for 2 things:
> > > 1. Determine which optional commands are supported by the CXL device.
> > > 2. Enumerate any vendor specific commands
> > >
> > > The CEL can be used by the driver to determine which commands are
> > > available in the hardware (though it isn't, yet). That set of commands
> > > might itself be a subset of commands which are available to be used via
> > > CXL_MEM_SEND_COMMAND IOCTL.
> > >
> > > Prior to this, all commands that the driver exposed were explicitly
> > > enabled. After this, only those commands that are found in the CEL are
> > > enabled.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> >
> > This patch made me wonder if the model for the command in quite right.
> > I think it would end up simpler with a pair of payload pointers for send
> > and receive (that can be equal when it makes sense).
> >
> > A few other things inline.
> >
> > Jonathan
>
> I'll address the others separately, but could you elaborate on this? I'm not
> sure I follow your meaning.
Further down in the review..
"
The fact that you end up bypassing the payload transfer stuff in mbox_cmd
rather suggests it's not a particularly good model. + it keeps confusing
me.
While the hardware uses a single region for the payload, there is nothing
saying the code has to work that way. Why not have separate payload_in and
payload_out pointers? Occasionally you might set them to the same buffer, but
elsewhere you could avoid the direct memcpy()s you are doing around the
send_cmd().
"
Jonathan
>
> [snip]
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-11 22:51 [RFC PATCH v3 00/16] CXL 2.0 Support Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/16] docs: cxl: Add basic documentation Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/16] cxl/acpi: Add an acpi_cxl module for the CXL interconnect Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 7:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-01-12 18:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-12 19:43 ` Dan Williams
2021-01-12 22:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-13 17:55 ` Kaneda, Erik
2021-01-20 19:27 ` Dan Williams
2021-01-20 19:18 ` Verma, Vishal L
2021-01-13 12:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-01-20 19:21 ` Verma, Vishal L
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/16] cxl/acpi: add OSC support Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-01-12 18:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/16] cxl/mem: Introduce a driver for CXL-2.0-Type-3 endpoints Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 7:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-01-12 19:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-12 20:06 ` Dan Williams
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/16] cxl/mem: Map memory device registers Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 19:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-12 19:21 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 20:40 ` Dan Williams
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/16] cxl/mem: Find device capabilities Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 19:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-12 19:22 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/16] cxl/mem: Implement polled mode mailbox Ben Widawsky
2021-01-13 18:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-14 17:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-14 17:50 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 18:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/16] cxl/mem: Register CXL memX devices Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 16:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/16] cxl/mem: Add basic IOCTL interface Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 16:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/16] cxl/mem: Add send command Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 17:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-21 18:15 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-22 11:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-22 17:08 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/16] taint: add taint for direct hardware access Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/16] taint: add taint for unfettered " Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 3:31 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/16] cxl/mem: Add a "RAW" send command Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/16] cxl/mem: Create concept of enabled commands Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 17:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-21 18:40 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-22 11:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/16] cxl/mem: Use CEL for enabling commands Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 18:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-14 18:13 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 18:32 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2021-01-14 19:04 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 19:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/16] cxl/mem: Add limited Get Log command (0401h) Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 18:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-23 0:14 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/16] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainers of the CXL driver Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 1:12 ` Joe Perches
[not found] ` <0f2a6d62-09d8-416f-e972-3e9869c3e1a6@alibaba-inc.com>
2021-01-12 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/16] CXL 2.0 Support Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 16:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210114183217.0000154c@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=cbrowy@avery-design.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.lll@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jcm@jonmasters.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sean.v.kelley@intel.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).