linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
Cc: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>,
	p.zabel@pengutronix.de, bhelgaas@google.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, maz@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: tegra: move to use request_irq by IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 10:45:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210623094519.GA11297@lpieralisi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78dd0d27-aca7-9d99-a79d-8587a2fbbbfb@nvidia.com>

[+Marc, Thomas]

thread: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/1621213953-54030-1-git-send-email-tiantao6@hisilicon.com

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 03:32:33PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> I want to re-examine this patch.
> I don't see any references in the kernel where IRQ_NOAUTOEN is passed
> directly in request_irq APIs.

AFAICS there are many references, not sure what you actually checked.

> It is always set explicitly through irq_set_status_flags() *before*
> calling request_irq APIs.  I don't see any comment in the header file
> either that says something like it should always be set before
> requesting the irq.  Lorenzo/Bjorn, could you please throw some light
> on what is correct thing to do here?

To be honest I don't know. Certainly Marc and Thomas know if they have
a minute to chime in.

Lorenzo

> Thanks,
> Vidya Sagar
> 
> 
> On 5/17/2021 3:47 PM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
> > 
> > - Vidya Sagar
> > 
> > On 5/17/2021 6:42 AM, Tian Tao wrote:
> > > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> > > 
> > > 
> > > request_irq() after setting IRQ_NOAUTOEN as below
> > > irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
> > > request_irq(dev, irq...);
> > > can be replaced by request_irq() with IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag.
> > > 
> > > this change is just to simplify the code, no actual functional changes.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > v2: update the commit message.
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 5 ++---
> > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> > > index bafd2c6..7349926 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> > > @@ -2021,14 +2021,13 @@ static int tegra_pcie_config_ep(struct
> > > tegra_pcie_dw *pcie,
> > >                  return -ENOMEM;
> > >          }
> > > 
> > > -       irq_set_status_flags(pcie->pex_rst_irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
> > > -
> > >          pcie->ep_state = EP_STATE_DISABLED;
> > > 
> > >          ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, pcie->pex_rst_irq, NULL,
> > >                                          tegra_pcie_ep_pex_rst_irq,
> > >                                          IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING |
> > > -                                       IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING |
> > > IRQF_ONESHOT,
> > > +                                       IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING |
> > > +                                       IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_AUTOEN
> > >                                          name, (void *)pcie);
> > >          if (ret < 0) {
> > >                  dev_err(dev, "Failed to request IRQ for PERST:
> > > %d\n", ret);
> > > -- 
> > > 2.7.4
> > > 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-23  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-17  1:12 [PATCH v2] PCI: tegra: move to use request_irq by IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag Tian Tao
2021-05-17 10:17 ` Vidya Sagar
2021-05-31 10:02   ` Vidya Sagar
2021-06-23  9:45     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2021-06-23 12:27       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-26 20:48     ` Michał Mirosław

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210623094519.GA11297@lpieralisi \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tiantao6@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).