linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
	Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: rcar: Add L1 link state fix into data abort hook
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 03:36:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <67f2451d-720d-1bd9-7628-6a9171f799d3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200913172207.GA1194428@bjorn-Precision-5520>

On 9/13/20 7:22 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

[...]

>> The R-Car PCIe controller is capable of handling L0s/L1 link states.
>> While the controller can enter and exit L0s link state, and exit L1
>> link state, without any additional action from the driver, to enter
>> L1 link state, the driver must complete the link state transition by
>> issuing additional commands to the controller.
> 
> So IIUC an R-Car Root Port can't enter L1 without help from the
> driver?  That *sounds* like a hardware defect, since ASPM is supposed
> to be "hardware-autonomous" once configured.

The driver needs to complete the switch from L0 to L1 link state, yes.

>> The problem is, this transition is not atomic. The controller sets
>> PMEL1RX bit in PMSR register upon reception of PM_ENTER_L1 DLLP from
>> the PCIe card, but then the controller enters some sort of inbetween
>> state. The driver must detect this condition and complete the link
>> state transition, by setting L1IATN bit in PMCTLR and waiting for
>> the link state transition to complete.
>>
>> If a PCIe access happens inside of this window, where the controller
>> is inbetween L0 and L1 link states, the access generates a fault and
>> the ARM 'imprecise external abort' handler is invoked.
> 
> Let me see if I understand this.
> 
>   1) Endpoint sends PM_ENTER_L1
>   2) R-Car Root Port receives PM_ENTER_L1, sets PMEL1RX
>   3) R-Car driver does something to complete transition to L1
> 
> And if the Endpoint driver does an MMIO access between 2) and 3), it
> causes an external abort?

Yes, because the link is in this inbetween state. So you need 3) to
complete that transition.

> I couldn't find anything in the R-Car driver today that completes the
> transition to L1.

That's because this patch adds it.

> And the MMIO access will immediately bring the link back to L0, won't
> it?

Yes

> Is there any benefit to L1 at all for this Root Port?  If it can't
> enter L1 and just stays in the in-between state until some event that
> will bring it *out* of L1, maybe we just need a quirk to stop
> advertising support for L1 in the first place.

Power saving I would say.

>> Just like other PCI controller drivers, here we hook the fault handler,
>> perform the fixup to help the controller enter L1 link state, and then
>> restart the instruction which triggered the fault. Since the controller
>> is in L1 link state now, the link can exit from L1 link state to L0 and
>> successfully complete the access.
>>
>> Note that this fixup is applicable only to Aarch32 R-Car controllers,
>> the Aarch64 R-Car perform the same fixup in TFA, see TFA commit
>> 0969397f2 ("rcar_gen3: plat: Prevent PCIe hang during L1X config access")
> 
> TFA?  This doesn't seem to be an upstream Linux commit; can you give a
> more specific reference?

This is the Trusted Firmware from ARM, in this case it behaves similar
to ACPI. See e.g.:

https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/commit/0969397f295621aa26b3d14b76dd397d22be58bf

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-14  1:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-12 21:18 [PATCH] PCI: rcar: Add L1 link state fix into data abort hook marek.vasut
2020-09-13 17:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-14  1:36   ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2020-09-14  4:01     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-16 13:50       ` Marek Vasut
2020-11-19 16:25   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-11-29 13:02     ` Marek Vasut
2020-09-14  9:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-09-14 10:11   ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=67f2451d-720d-1bd9-7628-6a9171f799d3@gmail.com \
    --to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).