From: "Derrick, Jonathan" <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
To: "kbusch@kernel.org" <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: "lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"helgaas@kernel.org" <helgaas@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: vmd: Add AHCI to fast interrupt list
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:21:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bfa36aff6bd83a4083b84d54896673fec28812c.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200912022636.GB3655346@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdl.wdc.com>
On Fri, 2020-09-11 at 19:26 -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 11:13:25AM -0600, Jon Derrick wrote:
> > Some platforms have an AHCI controller behind VMD. These platforms are
> > working correctly except for a case when the AHCI MSI is programmed with
> > VMD IRQ vector 0 (0xfee00000). When programmed with any other interrupt
> > (0xfeeNN000), the MSI is routed correctly and is handled by VMD. Placing
> > the AHCI MSI(s) in the fast-interrupt allow list solves the issue.
>
> The only reason we have the fast vs. slow is because of the non-posted
> transactions from slow driver's interrupt handlers tanking performance
> of the nvme devices sharing the same vector. The microsemi switchtec was
> one of the first such devices identified that led to the current
> split in the VMD domain. AHCI's driver also has non-posted transactions
> in their interrupt handling, so you probably don't want those devices
> sharing vectors with your fast nvme devices.
Good points and I think this would be simply resolved by offsetting the
starting vector and avoiding vector 0 for all vectors.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-14 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-04 17:13 [PATCH] PCI: vmd: Add AHCI to fast interrupt list Jon Derrick
2020-09-08 7:15 ` You-Sheng Yang
2020-09-12 2:26 ` Keith Busch
2020-09-14 12:21 ` Derrick, Jonathan [this message]
2020-10-19 9:37 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2020-10-20 15:20 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7bfa36aff6bd83a4083b84d54896673fec28812c.camel@intel.com \
--to=jonathan.derrick@intel.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).