* [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Add upper limit address for outbound iATU [not found] <CGME20201218153043epcas5p1831d9bc440e9e05609792f19dfeb4012@epcas5p1.samsung.com> @ 2020-12-18 15:30 ` Shradha Todi 2020-12-21 16:06 ` Rob Herring 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Shradha Todi @ 2020-12-18 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, linux-pci Cc: jingoohan1, gustavo.pimentel, lorenzo.pieralisi, robh, bhelgaas, pankaj.dubey, Shradha Todi The size parameter is unsigned long type which can accept size > 4GB. In that case, the upper limit address must be programmed. Add support to program the upper limit address and set INCREASE_REGION_SIZE in case size > 4GB. Signed-off-by: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@samsung.com> --- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 8 ++++++-- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c index 28c56a1..7eba3b2 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c @@ -290,12 +290,16 @@ static void __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, upper_32_bits(cpu_addr)); dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_LIMIT, lower_32_bits(cpu_addr + size - 1)); + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_UPPER_LIMIT, + upper_32_bits(cpu_addr + size - 1)); dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET, lower_32_bits(pci_addr)); dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET, upper_32_bits(pci_addr)); - dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR1, type | - PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no)); + val = type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no); + val = upper_32_bits(size - 1) ? + val | PCIE_ATU_INCREASE_REGION_SIZE : val; + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR1, val); dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR2, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE); /* diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h index b09329b..28b72fb 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ #define PCIE_ATU_DEV(x) FIELD_PREP(GENMASK(23, 19), x) #define PCIE_ATU_FUNC(x) FIELD_PREP(GENMASK(18, 16), x) #define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET 0x91C +#define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_LIMIT 0x924 #define PCIE_MISC_CONTROL_1_OFF 0x8BC #define PCIE_DBI_RO_WR_EN BIT(0) -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Add upper limit address for outbound iATU 2020-12-18 15:30 ` [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Add upper limit address for outbound iATU Shradha Todi @ 2020-12-21 16:06 ` Rob Herring 2020-12-24 5:36 ` Shradha Todi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Rob Herring @ 2020-12-21 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shradha Todi Cc: linux-kernel, PCI, Jingoo Han, Gustavo Pimentel, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Bjorn Helgaas, Pankaj Dubey On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 6:56 PM Shradha Todi <shradha.t@samsung.com> wrote: > > The size parameter is unsigned long type which can accept > size > 4GB. In that case, the upper limit address must be > programmed. Add support to program the upper limit > address and set INCREASE_REGION_SIZE in case size > 4GB. Not all DWC h/w versions have the upper register and bit. Is it safe to write to the non-existent register? > > Signed-off-by: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 8 ++++++-- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > index 28c56a1..7eba3b2 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > @@ -290,12 +290,16 @@ static void __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, > upper_32_bits(cpu_addr)); > dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_LIMIT, > lower_32_bits(cpu_addr + size - 1)); > + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_UPPER_LIMIT, > + upper_32_bits(cpu_addr + size - 1)); If not safe, perhaps only write if non-zero. > dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET, > lower_32_bits(pci_addr)); > dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET, > upper_32_bits(pci_addr)); > - dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR1, type | > - PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no)); > + val = type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no); > + val = upper_32_bits(size - 1) ? > + val | PCIE_ATU_INCREASE_REGION_SIZE : val; > + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR1, val); > dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR2, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE); > > /* > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > index b09329b..28b72fb 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ > #define PCIE_ATU_DEV(x) FIELD_PREP(GENMASK(23, 19), x) > #define PCIE_ATU_FUNC(x) FIELD_PREP(GENMASK(18, 16), x) > #define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET 0x91C > +#define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_LIMIT 0x924 > > #define PCIE_MISC_CONTROL_1_OFF 0x8BC > #define PCIE_DBI_RO_WR_EN BIT(0) > -- > 2.7.4 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Add upper limit address for outbound iATU 2020-12-21 16:06 ` Rob Herring @ 2020-12-24 5:36 ` Shradha Todi 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Shradha Todi @ 2020-12-24 5:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Rob Herring' Cc: linux-kernel, 'PCI', 'Jingoo Han', 'Gustavo Pimentel', 'Lorenzo Pieralisi', 'Bjorn Helgaas', 'Pankaj Dubey' > From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Add upper limit address for outbound iATU > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 6:56 PM Shradha Todi <shradha.t@samsung.com> > wrote: > > > > The size parameter is unsigned long type which can accept size > 4GB. > > In that case, the upper limit address must be programmed. Add support > > to program the upper limit address and set INCREASE_REGION_SIZE in > > case size > 4GB. > > Not all DWC h/w versions have the upper register and bit. Is it safe to write to > the non-existent register? Thanks for the review. Surely it exists post 4.80a version of controller but I am not sure in which version of the controller this was introduced. I can figure this out from the SNPS team and update the patch accordingly. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@samsung.com> > > --- > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 8 ++++++-- > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > > index 28c56a1..7eba3b2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > > @@ -290,12 +290,16 @@ static void __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct > dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, > > upper_32_bits(cpu_addr)); > > dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_LIMIT, > > lower_32_bits(cpu_addr + size - 1)); > > + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_UPPER_LIMIT, > > + upper_32_bits(cpu_addr + size - 1)); > > If not safe, perhaps only write if non-zero. > Writing zero has no side-affect and we have tested this. > > dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET, > > lower_32_bits(pci_addr)); > > dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET, > > upper_32_bits(pci_addr)); > > - dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR1, type | > > - PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no)); > > + val = type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no); > > + val = upper_32_bits(size - 1) ? > > + val | PCIE_ATU_INCREASE_REGION_SIZE : val; > > + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR1, val); > > dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR2, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE); > > > > /* > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > > index b09329b..28b72fb 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > > @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ > > #define PCIE_ATU_DEV(x) FIELD_PREP(GENMASK(23, 19), x) > > #define PCIE_ATU_FUNC(x) FIELD_PREP(GENMASK(18, 16), x) > > #define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET 0x91C > > +#define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_LIMIT 0x924 > > > > #define PCIE_MISC_CONTROL_1_OFF 0x8BC > > #define PCIE_DBI_RO_WR_EN BIT(0) > > -- > > 2.7.4 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-12-24 5:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CGME20201218153043epcas5p1831d9bc440e9e05609792f19dfeb4012@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2020-12-18 15:30 ` [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Add upper limit address for outbound iATU Shradha Todi
2020-12-21 16:06 ` Rob Herring
2020-12-24 5:36 ` Shradha Todi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).