linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy 
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@intel.com>,
	Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>,
	"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com>,
	Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: pciehp: Ignore Link Down/Up caused by DPC
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 10:52:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b70e19324bbdded90b728a5687aa78dc17c20306.1616921228.git.lukas@wunner.de> (raw)

Downstream Port Containment (PCIe Base Spec, sec. 6.2.10) disables the
link upon an error and attempts to re-enable it when instructed by the
DPC driver.

A slot which is both DPC- and hotplug-capable is currently brought down
by pciehp once DPC is triggered (due to the link change) and brought up
on successful recovery.  That's undesirable, the slot should remain up
so that the hotplugged device remains bound to its driver.  DPC notifies
the driver of the error and of successful recovery in pcie_do_recovery()
and the driver may then restore the device to working state.

Moreover, Sinan points out that turning off slot power by pciehp may
foil recovery by DPC:  Power off/on is a cold reset concurrently to
DPC's warm reset.  Sathyanarayanan reports extended delays or failure
in link retraining by DPC if pciehp brings down the slot.

Fix by detecting whether a Link Down event is caused by DPC and awaiting
recovery if so.  On successful recovery, ignore both the Link Down and
the subsequent Link Up event.

Afterwards, check whether the link is down to detect surprise-removal or
another DPC event immediately after DPC recovery.  Ensure that the
corresponding DLLSC event is not ignored by synthesizing it and
invoking irq_wake_thread() to trigger a re-run of pciehp_ist().

The IRQ threads of the hotplug and DPC drivers, pciehp_ist() and
dpc_handler(), race against each other.  If pciehp is faster than DPC,
it will wait until DPC recovery completes.

Recovery consists of two steps:  The first step (waiting for link
disablement) is recognizable by pciehp through a set DPC Trigger Status
bit.  The second step (waiting for link retraining) is recognizable
through a newly introduced PCI_DPC_RECOVERING flag.

If DPC is faster than pciehp, neither of the two flags will be set and
pciehp may glean the recovery status from the new PCI_DPC_RECOVERED flag.
The flag is zero if DPC didn't occur at all, hence DLLSC events are not
ignored by default.

This commit draws inspiration from previous attempts to synchronize DPC
with pciehp:

By Sinan Kaya, August 2018:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20180818065126.77912-1-okaya@kernel.org/

By Ethan Zhao, October 2020:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20201007113158.48933-1-haifeng.zhao@intel.com/

By Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy, March 2021:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/59cb30f5e5ac6d65427ceaadf1012b2ba8dbf66c.1615606143.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com/

Reported-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@intel.com>
Reported-by: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++
 drivers/pci/pci.h                |  4 ++
 drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c           | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
index fb3840e222ad..9d06939736c0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
@@ -563,6 +563,32 @@ void pciehp_power_off_slot(struct controller *ctrl)
 		 PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PWR_OFF);
 }
 
+static void pciehp_ignore_dpc_link_change(struct controller *ctrl,
+					  struct pci_dev *pdev, int irq)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Ignore link changes which occurred while waiting for DPC recovery.
+	 * Could be several if DPC triggered multiple times consecutively.
+	 */
+	synchronize_hardirq(irq);
+	atomic_and(~PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC, &ctrl->pending_events);
+	if (pciehp_poll_mode)
+		pcie_capability_write_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA,
+					   PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC);
+	ctrl_info(ctrl, "Slot(%s): Link Down/Up ignored (recovered by DPC)\n",
+		  slot_name(ctrl));
+
+	/*
+	 * If the link is unexpectedly down after successful recovery,
+	 * the corresponding link change may have been ignored above.
+	 * Synthesize it to ensure that it is acted on.
+	 */
+	down_read(&ctrl->reset_lock);
+	if (!pciehp_check_link_active(ctrl))
+		pciehp_request(ctrl, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC);
+	up_read(&ctrl->reset_lock);
+}
+
 static irqreturn_t pciehp_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
 	struct controller *ctrl = (struct controller *)dev_id;
@@ -706,6 +732,16 @@ static irqreturn_t pciehp_ist(int irq, void *dev_id)
 				      PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_ATTN_IND_ON);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Ignore Link Down/Up events caused by Downstream Port Containment
+	 * if recovery from the error succeeded.
+	 */
+	if ((events & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC) && pci_dpc_recovered(pdev) &&
+	    ctrl->state == ON_STATE) {
+		events &= ~PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC;
+		pciehp_ignore_dpc_link_change(ctrl, pdev, irq);
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Disable requests have higher priority than Presence Detect Changed
 	 * or Data Link Layer State Changed events.
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
index 9684b468267f..e5ae5e860431 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
@@ -392,6 +392,8 @@ static inline bool pci_dev_is_disconnected(const struct pci_dev *dev)
 
 /* pci_dev priv_flags */
 #define PCI_DEV_ADDED 0
+#define PCI_DPC_RECOVERED 1
+#define PCI_DPC_RECOVERING 2
 
 static inline void pci_dev_assign_added(struct pci_dev *dev, bool added)
 {
@@ -446,10 +448,12 @@ void pci_restore_dpc_state(struct pci_dev *dev);
 void pci_dpc_init(struct pci_dev *pdev);
 void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev);
 pci_ers_result_t dpc_reset_link(struct pci_dev *pdev);
+bool pci_dpc_recovered(struct pci_dev *pdev);
 #else
 static inline void pci_save_dpc_state(struct pci_dev *dev) {}
 static inline void pci_restore_dpc_state(struct pci_dev *dev) {}
 static inline void pci_dpc_init(struct pci_dev *pdev) {}
+static inline bool pci_dpc_recovered(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return false; }
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
index e05aba86a317..da47c448db8a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
@@ -71,6 +71,57 @@ void pci_restore_dpc_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	pci_write_config_word(dev, dev->dpc_cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_CTL, *cap);
 }
 
+static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(dpc_completed_waitqueue);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE
+static bool dpc_completed(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+	u16 status;
+
+	pci_read_config_word(pdev, pdev->dpc_cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS, &status);
+	if ((status != 0xffff) && (status & PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER))
+		return false;
+
+	if (test_bit(PCI_DPC_RECOVERING, &pdev->priv_flags))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+/**
+ * pci_dpc_recovered - whether DPC triggered and has recovered successfully
+ * @pdev: PCI device
+ *
+ * Return true if DPC was triggered for @pdev and has recovered successfully.
+ * Wait for recovery if it hasn't completed yet.  Called from the PCIe hotplug
+ * driver to recognize and ignore Link Down/Up events caused by DPC.
+ */
+bool pci_dpc_recovered(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+	struct pci_host_bridge *host;
+
+	if (!pdev->dpc_cap)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * Synchronization between hotplug and DPC is not supported
+	 * if DPC is owned by firmware and EDR is not enabled.
+	 */
+	host = pci_find_host_bridge(pdev->bus);
+	if (!host->native_dpc && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_EDR))
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * Need a timeout in case DPC never completes due to failure of
+	 * dpc_wait_rp_inactive().
+	 */
+	wait_event_timeout(dpc_completed_waitqueue, dpc_completed(pdev),
+			   msecs_to_jiffies(3000));
+
+	return test_and_clear_bit(PCI_DPC_RECOVERED, &pdev->priv_flags);
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE */
+
 static int dpc_wait_rp_inactive(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
 	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ;
@@ -91,8 +142,11 @@ static int dpc_wait_rp_inactive(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 
 pci_ers_result_t dpc_reset_link(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
+	pci_ers_result_t ret;
 	u16 cap;
 
+	set_bit(PCI_DPC_RECOVERING, &pdev->priv_flags);
+
 	/*
 	 * DPC disables the Link automatically in hardware, so it has
 	 * already been reset by the time we get here.
@@ -106,18 +160,27 @@ pci_ers_result_t dpc_reset_link(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 	if (!pcie_wait_for_link(pdev, false))
 		pci_info(pdev, "Data Link Layer Link Active not cleared in 1000 msec\n");
 
-	if (pdev->dpc_rp_extensions && dpc_wait_rp_inactive(pdev))
-		return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
+	if (pdev->dpc_rp_extensions && dpc_wait_rp_inactive(pdev)) {
+		clear_bit(PCI_DPC_RECOVERED, &pdev->priv_flags);
+		ret = PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	pci_write_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS,
 			      PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER);
 
 	if (!pcie_wait_for_link(pdev, true)) {
 		pci_info(pdev, "Data Link Layer Link Active not set in 1000 msec\n");
-		return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
+		clear_bit(PCI_DPC_RECOVERED, &pdev->priv_flags);
+		ret = PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
+	} else {
+		set_bit(PCI_DPC_RECOVERED, &pdev->priv_flags);
+		ret = PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
 	}
-
-	return PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
+out:
+	clear_bit(PCI_DPC_RECOVERING, &pdev->priv_flags);
+	wake_up_all(&dpc_completed_waitqueue);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void dpc_process_rp_pio_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
-- 
2.30.2


             reply	other threads:[~2021-03-28  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-28  8:52 Lukas Wunner [this message]
2021-03-30 20:53 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-04-28  0:39   ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-04-28  1:42     ` Zhao, Haifeng
2021-04-28 10:08 ` Yicong Yang
2021-04-28 14:40   ` Lukas Wunner
2021-04-29 11:29     ` Yicong Yang
2021-04-29 12:40       ` Zhao, Haifeng
2021-04-29 19:42       ` Lukas Wunner
2021-04-30  8:47         ` Yicong Yang
2021-04-30 12:15           ` Lukas Wunner
2021-04-29 19:36 ` Keith Busch
2021-04-29 20:16   ` Lukas Wunner
2021-04-29 21:16     ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b70e19324bbdded90b728a5687aa78dc17c20306.1616921228.git.lukas@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=haifeng.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=okaya@kernel.org \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=ruscur@russell.cc \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] PCI: pciehp: Ignore Link Down/Up caused by DPC' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).