linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
	Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	Alexander Clouter <alex@digriz.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 03/13] cpufreq: cpufreq_governor: Demote store_sampling_rate() header to standard comment block
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 15:50:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200714145049.2496163-4-lee.jones@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200714145049.2496163-1-lee.jones@linaro.org>

There is no need for this to be denoted as kerneldoc.

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c:46: warning: Function parameter or member 'attr_set' not described in 'store_sampling_rate'
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c:46: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'store_sampling_rate'
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c:46: warning: Function parameter or member 'count' not described in 'store_sampling_rate'

Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Clouter <alex@digriz.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
index f99ae45efaea7..63f7c219062b9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_dbs_info, cpu_dbs);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(gov_dbs_data_mutex);
 
 /* Common sysfs tunables */
-/**
+/*
  * store_sampling_rate - update sampling rate effective immediately if needed.
  *
  * If new rate is smaller than the old, simply updating
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-14 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-14 14:50 [PATCH 00/13] Rid W=1 warnings in CPUFreq Lee Jones
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 01/13] cpufreq: freq_table: Demote obvious misuse of kerneldoc to standard comment blocks Lee Jones
2020-07-15  2:44   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 02/13] cpufreq: cpufreq: Demote lots of function headers unworthy of kerneldoc status Lee Jones
2020-07-15  2:49   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  6:47     ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15  7:09       ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-14 14:50 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2020-07-15  2:52   ` [PATCH 03/13] cpufreq: cpufreq_governor: Demote store_sampling_rate() header to standard comment block Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  6:45     ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15  7:08       ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  7:31         ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15  8:02           ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  8:15             ` Lee Jones
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 04/13] cpufreq: sti-cpufreq: Fix some formatting and misspelling issues Lee Jones
2020-07-15  2:58   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 05/13] cpufreq/arch: powerpc: pasemi: Move prototypes to shared header Lee Jones
2020-07-15  3:07   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  3:49     ` Olof Johansson
2020-07-15  3:51       ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  6:36       ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15  6:39         ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  3:26   ` Olof Johansson
2020-07-15  6:33     ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15  6:46       ` Olof Johansson
2020-07-15  7:33         ` Lee Jones
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 06/13] cpufreq: powernv-cpufreq: Functions only used in call-backs should be static Lee Jones
2020-07-15  3:07   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 07/13] cpufreq: powernv-cpufreq: Fix a bunch of kerneldoc related issues Lee Jones
2020-07-15  3:09   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 08/13] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Take 'dummy' principle one stage further Lee Jones
2020-07-14 16:03   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-14 16:20     ` Robin Murphy
2020-07-14 21:00       ` Lee Jones
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 09/13] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Remove unused ID structs Lee Jones
2020-07-14 15:58   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-14 21:03     ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15  3:24       ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  3:27         ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  6:37           ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15 11:27           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-15 11:34             ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15 11:44               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-15 11:50                 ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15 12:07                   ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15 12:11                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-15 12:09                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-15 12:16                     ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15 12:30                       ` Robin Murphy
2020-07-15 12:38                         ` Lee Jones
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 10/13] cpufreq: powernow-k8: Make use of known set but not used variables Lee Jones
2020-07-14 17:43   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-14 21:01     ` Lee Jones
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 11/13] cpufreq: pcc-cpufreq: Remove unused ID structs Lee Jones
2020-07-14 17:42   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 12/13] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Supply struct attribute description for get_aperf_mperf_shift() Lee Jones
2020-07-14 16:35   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-14 21:03     ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15 12:38       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 13/13] cpufreq: amd_freq_sensitivity: Remove unused ID structs Lee Jones
2020-07-14 17:15   ` Kim Phillips
2020-07-14 21:02     ` Lee Jones
2020-07-14 21:13       ` Kim Phillips
2020-07-15  6:47         ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15  3:36 ` [PATCH 00/13] Rid W=1 warnings in CPUFreq Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  6:32   ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15  6:38     ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  7:34       ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200714145049.2496163-4-lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=alex@digriz.org.uk \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).