linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
	Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	Alexander Clouter <alex@digriz.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] cpufreq: cpufreq_governor: Demote store_sampling_rate() header to standard comment block
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 07:45:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200715064539.GS1398296@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200715025249.ukoqup4piqiz5lim@vireshk-i7>

On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote:

> On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote:
> > There is no need for this to be denoted as kerneldoc.
> > 
> > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
> > 
> >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c:46: warning: Function parameter or member 'attr_set' not described in 'store_sampling_rate'
> >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c:46: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'store_sampling_rate'
> >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c:46: warning: Function parameter or member 'count' not described in 'store_sampling_rate'
> > 
> > Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
> > Cc: Alexander Clouter <alex@digriz.org.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> > index f99ae45efaea7..63f7c219062b9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_dbs_info, cpu_dbs);
> >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(gov_dbs_data_mutex);
> >  
> >  /* Common sysfs tunables */
> > -/**
> > +/*
> 
> This is an important routine with good documentation details already
> there, though internal to governors and so I would rather keep it.

It maybe documented, but it isn't kerneldoc, for 2 reasons; a) it
doesn't meet the standards required qualify as kerneldoc i.e. it's
missing descriptions for each of the function parameters, which is why
the kerneldoc checker is complaining about it and b) it is not
referenced by any *.rst file:

 git grep kernel-doc::.*cpufreq_governor.c
 /* no results */

So what is the justification for keeping it as kerneldoc?

> >   * store_sampling_rate - update sampling rate effective immediately if needed.
> >   *
> >   * If new rate is smaller than the old, simply updating
> 

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-15  6:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-14 14:50 [PATCH 00/13] Rid W=1 warnings in CPUFreq Lee Jones
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 01/13] cpufreq: freq_table: Demote obvious misuse of kerneldoc to standard comment blocks Lee Jones
2020-07-15  2:44   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 02/13] cpufreq: cpufreq: Demote lots of function headers unworthy of kerneldoc status Lee Jones
2020-07-15  2:49   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  6:47     ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15  7:09       ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 03/13] cpufreq: cpufreq_governor: Demote store_sampling_rate() header to standard comment block Lee Jones
2020-07-15  2:52   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  6:45     ` Lee Jones [this message]
2020-07-15  7:08       ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  7:31         ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15  8:02           ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  8:15             ` Lee Jones
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 04/13] cpufreq: sti-cpufreq: Fix some formatting and misspelling issues Lee Jones
2020-07-15  2:58   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 05/13] cpufreq/arch: powerpc: pasemi: Move prototypes to shared header Lee Jones
2020-07-15  3:07   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  3:49     ` Olof Johansson
2020-07-15  3:51       ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  6:36       ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15  6:39         ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  3:26   ` Olof Johansson
2020-07-15  6:33     ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15  6:46       ` Olof Johansson
2020-07-15  7:33         ` Lee Jones
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 06/13] cpufreq: powernv-cpufreq: Functions only used in call-backs should be static Lee Jones
2020-07-15  3:07   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 07/13] cpufreq: powernv-cpufreq: Fix a bunch of kerneldoc related issues Lee Jones
2020-07-15  3:09   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 08/13] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Take 'dummy' principle one stage further Lee Jones
2020-07-14 16:03   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-14 16:20     ` Robin Murphy
2020-07-14 21:00       ` Lee Jones
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 09/13] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Remove unused ID structs Lee Jones
2020-07-14 15:58   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-14 21:03     ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15  3:24       ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  3:27         ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  6:37           ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15 11:27           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-15 11:34             ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15 11:44               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-15 11:50                 ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15 12:07                   ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15 12:11                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-15 12:09                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-15 12:16                     ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15 12:30                       ` Robin Murphy
2020-07-15 12:38                         ` Lee Jones
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 10/13] cpufreq: powernow-k8: Make use of known set but not used variables Lee Jones
2020-07-14 17:43   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-14 21:01     ` Lee Jones
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 11/13] cpufreq: pcc-cpufreq: Remove unused ID structs Lee Jones
2020-07-14 17:42   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 12/13] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Supply struct attribute description for get_aperf_mperf_shift() Lee Jones
2020-07-14 16:35   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-14 21:03     ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15 12:38       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-14 14:50 ` [PATCH 13/13] cpufreq: amd_freq_sensitivity: Remove unused ID structs Lee Jones
2020-07-14 17:15   ` Kim Phillips
2020-07-14 21:02     ` Lee Jones
2020-07-14 21:13       ` Kim Phillips
2020-07-15  6:47         ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15  3:36 ` [PATCH 00/13] Rid W=1 warnings in CPUFreq Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  6:32   ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15  6:38     ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  7:34       ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200715064539.GS1398296@dell \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=alex@digriz.org.uk \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).