* [PATCH 0/2] rproc core patches needed for TI K3 drivers
@ 2020-04-17 0:20 Suman Anna
2020-04-17 0:20 ` Suman Anna
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Suman Anna @ 2020-04-17 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
Cc: linux-remoteproc, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Suman Anna
Hi Bjorn, Mathieu,
The following 2 patches were a revised version and split out from the
TI K3 R5F remoteproc support patch series [1]. The patches do use the
cleanup logic from Mathieu's "remoteproc: Refactor function rproc_alloc()"
series. The patches address both of your comments.
Delta changes in individual patches.
regards
Suman
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11456367/
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11492005/
Loic Pallardy (1):
remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops
Suman Anna (1):
remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.26.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/2] rproc core patches needed for TI K3 drivers
2020-04-17 0:20 [PATCH 0/2] rproc core patches needed for TI K3 drivers Suman Anna
@ 2020-04-17 0:20 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 0:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops Suman Anna
2020-04-17 0:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field Suman Anna
2 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Suman Anna @ 2020-04-17 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
Cc: linux-remoteproc, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Suman Anna
Hi Bjorn, Mathieu,
The following 2 patches were a revised version and split out from the
TI K3 R5F remoteproc support patch series [1]. The patches do use the
cleanup logic from Mathieu's "remoteproc: Refactor function rproc_alloc()"
series. The patches address both of your comments.
Delta changes in individual patches.
regards
Suman
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11456367/
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11492005/
Loic Pallardy (1):
remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops
Suman Anna (1):
remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.26.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops
2020-04-17 0:20 [PATCH 0/2] rproc core patches needed for TI K3 drivers Suman Anna
2020-04-17 0:20 ` Suman Anna
@ 2020-04-17 0:20 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 0:20 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-21 2:52 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-17 0:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field Suman Anna
2 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Suman Anna @ 2020-04-17 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
Cc: linux-remoteproc, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Loic Pallardy,
Suman Anna
From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
On some SoC architecture, it is needed to enable HW like
clock, bus, regulator, memory region... before loading
co-processor firmware.
This patch introduces prepare and unprepare ops to execute
platform specific function before firmware loading and after
stop execution.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
---
v1:
- Make the direct ops into inline helper functions in line
with the comments on the MCU sync series (v1 comments).
No change in functionality.
- Picked up the Reviewed-by tags
v0: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456383/
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index d681eeb962b6..e38f627059ac 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1394,12 +1394,19 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
return ret;
}
+ /* Prepare rproc for firmware loading if needed */
+ ret = rproc_prepare_device(rproc);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "can't prepare rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
+ goto disable_iommu;
+ }
+
rproc->bootaddr = rproc_get_boot_addr(rproc, fw);
/* Load resource table, core dump segment list etc from the firmware */
ret = rproc_parse_fw(rproc, fw);
if (ret)
- goto disable_iommu;
+ goto unprepare_rproc;
/* reset max_notifyid */
rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
@@ -1433,6 +1440,9 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
kfree(rproc->cached_table);
rproc->cached_table = NULL;
rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
+unprepare_rproc:
+ /* release HW resources if needed */
+ rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
disable_iommu:
rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
return ret;
@@ -1838,6 +1848,9 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
/* clean up all acquired resources */
rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
+ /* release HW resources if needed */
+ rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
+
rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
/* Free the copy of the resource table */
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
index b389dc79da81..101e6be8d240 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
@@ -64,6 +64,22 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
struct rproc_mem_entry *
rproc_find_carveout_by_name(struct rproc *rproc, const char *name, ...);
+static inline int rproc_prepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+ if (rproc->ops->prepare)
+ return rproc->ops->prepare(rproc);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int rproc_unprepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+ if (rproc->ops->unprepare)
+ return rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline
int rproc_fw_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index 38607107b7cb..b8481ac969f1 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
/**
* struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers
+ * @prepare: prepare device for code loading
+ * @unprepare: unprepare device after stop
* @start: power on the device and boot it
* @stop: power off the device
* @kick: kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
@@ -373,6 +375,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
* panic at least the returned number of milliseconds
*/
struct rproc_ops {
+ int (*prepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
+ int (*unprepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
--
2.26.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops
2020-04-17 0:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops Suman Anna
@ 2020-04-17 0:20 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-21 2:52 ` Bjorn Andersson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Suman Anna @ 2020-04-17 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
Cc: linux-remoteproc, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Loic Pallardy,
Suman Anna
From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
On some SoC architecture, it is needed to enable HW like
clock, bus, regulator, memory region... before loading
co-processor firmware.
This patch introduces prepare and unprepare ops to execute
platform specific function before firmware loading and after
stop execution.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
---
v1:
- Make the direct ops into inline helper functions in line
with the comments on the MCU sync series (v1 comments).
No change in functionality.
- Picked up the Reviewed-by tags
v0: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456383/
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index d681eeb962b6..e38f627059ac 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1394,12 +1394,19 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
return ret;
}
+ /* Prepare rproc for firmware loading if needed */
+ ret = rproc_prepare_device(rproc);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "can't prepare rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
+ goto disable_iommu;
+ }
+
rproc->bootaddr = rproc_get_boot_addr(rproc, fw);
/* Load resource table, core dump segment list etc from the firmware */
ret = rproc_parse_fw(rproc, fw);
if (ret)
- goto disable_iommu;
+ goto unprepare_rproc;
/* reset max_notifyid */
rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
@@ -1433,6 +1440,9 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
kfree(rproc->cached_table);
rproc->cached_table = NULL;
rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
+unprepare_rproc:
+ /* release HW resources if needed */
+ rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
disable_iommu:
rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
return ret;
@@ -1838,6 +1848,9 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
/* clean up all acquired resources */
rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
+ /* release HW resources if needed */
+ rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
+
rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
/* Free the copy of the resource table */
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
index b389dc79da81..101e6be8d240 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
@@ -64,6 +64,22 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
struct rproc_mem_entry *
rproc_find_carveout_by_name(struct rproc *rproc, const char *name, ...);
+static inline int rproc_prepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+ if (rproc->ops->prepare)
+ return rproc->ops->prepare(rproc);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int rproc_unprepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+ if (rproc->ops->unprepare)
+ return rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline
int rproc_fw_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index 38607107b7cb..b8481ac969f1 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
/**
* struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers
+ * @prepare: prepare device for code loading
+ * @unprepare: unprepare device after stop
* @start: power on the device and boot it
* @stop: power off the device
* @kick: kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
@@ -373,6 +375,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
* panic at least the returned number of milliseconds
*/
struct rproc_ops {
+ int (*prepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
+ int (*unprepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
--
2.26.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field
2020-04-17 0:20 [PATCH 0/2] rproc core patches needed for TI K3 drivers Suman Anna
2020-04-17 0:20 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 0:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops Suman Anna
@ 2020-04-17 0:20 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 0:20 ` Suman Anna
` (2 more replies)
2 siblings, 3 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Suman Anna @ 2020-04-17 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
Cc: linux-remoteproc, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Suman Anna
The current name field used in the remoteproc structure is simply
a pointer to a name field supplied during the rproc_alloc() call.
The pointer passed in by remoteproc drivers during registration is
typically a dev_name pointer, but it is possible that the pointer
will no longer remain valid if the devices themselves were created
at runtime like in the case of of_platform_populate(), and were
deleted upon any failures within the respective remoteproc driver
probe function.
So, allocate and maintain a local copy for this name field to
keep it agnostic of the logic used in the remoteproc drivers.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
---
v1:
- Patch baselined on top of Mathieu's rproc_alloc() refactor
series, and so addresses Bjorn's simplified cleanup comments
- Switch to {kstrdup/kfree}_const variants
v0: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456385/
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index e38f627059ac..3cebface3f26 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1984,6 +1984,7 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev)
kfree(rproc->firmware);
kfree(rproc->ops);
+ kfree_const(rproc->name);
kfree(rproc);
}
@@ -2069,7 +2070,6 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
if (!rproc)
return NULL;
- rproc->name = name;
rproc->priv = &rproc[1];
rproc->auto_boot = true;
rproc->elf_class = ELFCLASS32;
@@ -2081,6 +2081,10 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
rproc->dev.driver_data = rproc;
idr_init(&rproc->notifyids);
+ rproc->name = kstrdup_const(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!rproc->name)
+ goto put_device;
+
if (rproc_alloc_firmware(rproc, name, firmware))
goto put_device;
--
2.26.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field
2020-04-17 0:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field Suman Anna
@ 2020-04-17 0:20 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 17:04 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-20 4:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
2 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Suman Anna @ 2020-04-17 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
Cc: linux-remoteproc, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Suman Anna
The current name field used in the remoteproc structure is simply
a pointer to a name field supplied during the rproc_alloc() call.
The pointer passed in by remoteproc drivers during registration is
typically a dev_name pointer, but it is possible that the pointer
will no longer remain valid if the devices themselves were created
at runtime like in the case of of_platform_populate(), and were
deleted upon any failures within the respective remoteproc driver
probe function.
So, allocate and maintain a local copy for this name field to
keep it agnostic of the logic used in the remoteproc drivers.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
---
v1:
- Patch baselined on top of Mathieu's rproc_alloc() refactor
series, and so addresses Bjorn's simplified cleanup comments
- Switch to {kstrdup/kfree}_const variants
v0: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456385/
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index e38f627059ac..3cebface3f26 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1984,6 +1984,7 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev)
kfree(rproc->firmware);
kfree(rproc->ops);
+ kfree_const(rproc->name);
kfree(rproc);
}
@@ -2069,7 +2070,6 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
if (!rproc)
return NULL;
- rproc->name = name;
rproc->priv = &rproc[1];
rproc->auto_boot = true;
rproc->elf_class = ELFCLASS32;
@@ -2081,6 +2081,10 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
rproc->dev.driver_data = rproc;
idr_init(&rproc->notifyids);
+ rproc->name = kstrdup_const(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!rproc->name)
+ goto put_device;
+
if (rproc_alloc_firmware(rproc, name, firmware))
goto put_device;
--
2.26.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field
2020-04-17 0:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field Suman Anna
2020-04-17 0:20 ` Suman Anna
@ 2020-04-17 17:04 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-17 17:04 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-20 4:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
2 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2020-04-17 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suman Anna
Cc: Bjorn Andersson, linux-remoteproc, linux-arm-kernel,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:20, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> wrote:
>
> The current name field used in the remoteproc structure is simply
> a pointer to a name field supplied during the rproc_alloc() call.
> The pointer passed in by remoteproc drivers during registration is
> typically a dev_name pointer, but it is possible that the pointer
> will no longer remain valid if the devices themselves were created
> at runtime like in the case of of_platform_populate(), and were
> deleted upon any failures within the respective remoteproc driver
> probe function.
>
> So, allocate and maintain a local copy for this name field to
> keep it agnostic of the logic used in the remoteproc drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> ---
> v1:
> - Patch baselined on top of Mathieu's rproc_alloc() refactor
> series, and so addresses Bjorn's simplified cleanup comments
> - Switch to {kstrdup/kfree}_const variants
> v0: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456385/
>
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index e38f627059ac..3cebface3f26 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1984,6 +1984,7 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev)
>
> kfree(rproc->firmware);
> kfree(rproc->ops);
> + kfree_const(rproc->name);
> kfree(rproc);
> }
>
> @@ -2069,7 +2070,6 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> if (!rproc)
> return NULL;
>
> - rproc->name = name;
> rproc->priv = &rproc[1];
> rproc->auto_boot = true;
> rproc->elf_class = ELFCLASS32;
> @@ -2081,6 +2081,10 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> rproc->dev.driver_data = rproc;
> idr_init(&rproc->notifyids);
>
> + rproc->name = kstrdup_const(name, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rproc->name)
> + goto put_device;
> +
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> if (rproc_alloc_firmware(rproc, name, firmware))
> goto put_device;
>
> --
> 2.26.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field
2020-04-17 17:04 ` Mathieu Poirier
@ 2020-04-17 17:04 ` Mathieu Poirier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2020-04-17 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suman Anna
Cc: Bjorn Andersson, linux-remoteproc, linux-arm-kernel,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:20, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> wrote:
>
> The current name field used in the remoteproc structure is simply
> a pointer to a name field supplied during the rproc_alloc() call.
> The pointer passed in by remoteproc drivers during registration is
> typically a dev_name pointer, but it is possible that the pointer
> will no longer remain valid if the devices themselves were created
> at runtime like in the case of of_platform_populate(), and were
> deleted upon any failures within the respective remoteproc driver
> probe function.
>
> So, allocate and maintain a local copy for this name field to
> keep it agnostic of the logic used in the remoteproc drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> ---
> v1:
> - Patch baselined on top of Mathieu's rproc_alloc() refactor
> series, and so addresses Bjorn's simplified cleanup comments
> - Switch to {kstrdup/kfree}_const variants
> v0: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456385/
>
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index e38f627059ac..3cebface3f26 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1984,6 +1984,7 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev)
>
> kfree(rproc->firmware);
> kfree(rproc->ops);
> + kfree_const(rproc->name);
> kfree(rproc);
> }
>
> @@ -2069,7 +2070,6 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> if (!rproc)
> return NULL;
>
> - rproc->name = name;
> rproc->priv = &rproc[1];
> rproc->auto_boot = true;
> rproc->elf_class = ELFCLASS32;
> @@ -2081,6 +2081,10 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> rproc->dev.driver_data = rproc;
> idr_init(&rproc->notifyids);
>
> + rproc->name = kstrdup_const(name, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rproc->name)
> + goto put_device;
> +
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> if (rproc_alloc_firmware(rproc, name, firmware))
> goto put_device;
>
> --
> 2.26.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field
2020-04-20 4:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
@ 2020-04-20 4:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2020-04-20 4:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suman Anna
Cc: Mathieu Poirier, linux-remoteproc, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On Thu 16 Apr 17:20 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
> The current name field used in the remoteproc structure is simply
> a pointer to a name field supplied during the rproc_alloc() call.
> The pointer passed in by remoteproc drivers during registration is
> typically a dev_name pointer, but it is possible that the pointer
> will no longer remain valid if the devices themselves were created
> at runtime like in the case of of_platform_populate(), and were
> deleted upon any failures within the respective remoteproc driver
> probe function.
>
> So, allocate and maintain a local copy for this name field to
> keep it agnostic of the logic used in the remoteproc drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Regards,
Bjorn
> ---
> v1:
> - Patch baselined on top of Mathieu's rproc_alloc() refactor
> series, and so addresses Bjorn's simplified cleanup comments
> - Switch to {kstrdup/kfree}_const variants
> v0: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456385/
>
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index e38f627059ac..3cebface3f26 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1984,6 +1984,7 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev)
>
> kfree(rproc->firmware);
> kfree(rproc->ops);
> + kfree_const(rproc->name);
> kfree(rproc);
> }
>
> @@ -2069,7 +2070,6 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> if (!rproc)
> return NULL;
>
> - rproc->name = name;
> rproc->priv = &rproc[1];
> rproc->auto_boot = true;
> rproc->elf_class = ELFCLASS32;
> @@ -2081,6 +2081,10 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> rproc->dev.driver_data = rproc;
> idr_init(&rproc->notifyids);
>
> + rproc->name = kstrdup_const(name, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rproc->name)
> + goto put_device;
> +
> if (rproc_alloc_firmware(rproc, name, firmware))
> goto put_device;
>
> --
> 2.26.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field
2020-04-17 0:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field Suman Anna
2020-04-17 0:20 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 17:04 ` Mathieu Poirier
@ 2020-04-20 4:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20 4:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
2 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2020-04-20 4:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suman Anna
Cc: Mathieu Poirier, linux-remoteproc, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On Thu 16 Apr 17:20 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
> The current name field used in the remoteproc structure is simply
> a pointer to a name field supplied during the rproc_alloc() call.
> The pointer passed in by remoteproc drivers during registration is
> typically a dev_name pointer, but it is possible that the pointer
> will no longer remain valid if the devices themselves were created
> at runtime like in the case of of_platform_populate(), and were
> deleted upon any failures within the respective remoteproc driver
> probe function.
>
> So, allocate and maintain a local copy for this name field to
> keep it agnostic of the logic used in the remoteproc drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Regards,
Bjorn
> ---
> v1:
> - Patch baselined on top of Mathieu's rproc_alloc() refactor
> series, and so addresses Bjorn's simplified cleanup comments
> - Switch to {kstrdup/kfree}_const variants
> v0: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456385/
>
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index e38f627059ac..3cebface3f26 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1984,6 +1984,7 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev)
>
> kfree(rproc->firmware);
> kfree(rproc->ops);
> + kfree_const(rproc->name);
> kfree(rproc);
> }
>
> @@ -2069,7 +2070,6 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> if (!rproc)
> return NULL;
>
> - rproc->name = name;
> rproc->priv = &rproc[1];
> rproc->auto_boot = true;
> rproc->elf_class = ELFCLASS32;
> @@ -2081,6 +2081,10 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> rproc->dev.driver_data = rproc;
> idr_init(&rproc->notifyids);
>
> + rproc->name = kstrdup_const(name, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rproc->name)
> + goto put_device;
> +
> if (rproc_alloc_firmware(rproc, name, firmware))
> goto put_device;
>
> --
> 2.26.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops
2020-04-21 2:52 ` Bjorn Andersson
@ 2020-04-21 2:52 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-21 14:12 ` Suman Anna
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2020-04-21 2:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suman Anna
Cc: Mathieu Poirier, linux-remoteproc, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel, Loic Pallardy
On Thu 16 Apr 17:20 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
> From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
>
> On some SoC architecture, it is needed to enable HW like
> clock, bus, regulator, memory region... before loading
> co-processor firmware.
>
> This patch introduces prepare and unprepare ops to execute
> platform specific function before firmware loading and after
> stop execution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Do we have an inbound user of these new oops?
Regards,
Bjorn
> ---
> v1:
> - Make the direct ops into inline helper functions in line
> with the comments on the MCU sync series (v1 comments).
> No change in functionality.
> - Picked up the Reviewed-by tags
> v0: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456383/
>
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index d681eeb962b6..e38f627059ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1394,12 +1394,19 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + /* Prepare rproc for firmware loading if needed */
> + ret = rproc_prepare_device(rproc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "can't prepare rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
> + goto disable_iommu;
> + }
> +
> rproc->bootaddr = rproc_get_boot_addr(rproc, fw);
>
> /* Load resource table, core dump segment list etc from the firmware */
> ret = rproc_parse_fw(rproc, fw);
> if (ret)
> - goto disable_iommu;
> + goto unprepare_rproc;
>
> /* reset max_notifyid */
> rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
> @@ -1433,6 +1440,9 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> kfree(rproc->cached_table);
> rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
> +unprepare_rproc:
> + /* release HW resources if needed */
> + rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
> disable_iommu:
> rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
> return ret;
> @@ -1838,6 +1848,9 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
> /* clean up all acquired resources */
> rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
>
> + /* release HW resources if needed */
> + rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
> +
> rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
>
> /* Free the copy of the resource table */
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> index b389dc79da81..101e6be8d240 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,22 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> struct rproc_mem_entry *
> rproc_find_carveout_by_name(struct rproc *rproc, const char *name, ...);
>
> +static inline int rproc_prepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + if (rproc->ops->prepare)
> + return rproc->ops->prepare(rproc);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rproc_unprepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + if (rproc->ops->unprepare)
> + return rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static inline
> int rproc_fw_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> {
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index 38607107b7cb..b8481ac969f1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
>
> /**
> * struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers
> + * @prepare: prepare device for code loading
> + * @unprepare: unprepare device after stop
> * @start: power on the device and boot it
> * @stop: power off the device
> * @kick: kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
> @@ -373,6 +375,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
> * panic at least the returned number of milliseconds
> */
> struct rproc_ops {
> + int (*prepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
> + int (*unprepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
> int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
> int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
> void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
> --
> 2.26.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops
2020-04-17 0:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops Suman Anna
2020-04-17 0:20 ` Suman Anna
@ 2020-04-21 2:52 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-21 2:52 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-21 14:12 ` Suman Anna
1 sibling, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2020-04-21 2:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suman Anna
Cc: Mathieu Poirier, linux-remoteproc, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel, Loic Pallardy
On Thu 16 Apr 17:20 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
> From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
>
> On some SoC architecture, it is needed to enable HW like
> clock, bus, regulator, memory region... before loading
> co-processor firmware.
>
> This patch introduces prepare and unprepare ops to execute
> platform specific function before firmware loading and after
> stop execution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Do we have an inbound user of these new oops?
Regards,
Bjorn
> ---
> v1:
> - Make the direct ops into inline helper functions in line
> with the comments on the MCU sync series (v1 comments).
> No change in functionality.
> - Picked up the Reviewed-by tags
> v0: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456383/
>
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index d681eeb962b6..e38f627059ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1394,12 +1394,19 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + /* Prepare rproc for firmware loading if needed */
> + ret = rproc_prepare_device(rproc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "can't prepare rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
> + goto disable_iommu;
> + }
> +
> rproc->bootaddr = rproc_get_boot_addr(rproc, fw);
>
> /* Load resource table, core dump segment list etc from the firmware */
> ret = rproc_parse_fw(rproc, fw);
> if (ret)
> - goto disable_iommu;
> + goto unprepare_rproc;
>
> /* reset max_notifyid */
> rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
> @@ -1433,6 +1440,9 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> kfree(rproc->cached_table);
> rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
> +unprepare_rproc:
> + /* release HW resources if needed */
> + rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
> disable_iommu:
> rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
> return ret;
> @@ -1838,6 +1848,9 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
> /* clean up all acquired resources */
> rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
>
> + /* release HW resources if needed */
> + rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
> +
> rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
>
> /* Free the copy of the resource table */
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> index b389dc79da81..101e6be8d240 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,22 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> struct rproc_mem_entry *
> rproc_find_carveout_by_name(struct rproc *rproc, const char *name, ...);
>
> +static inline int rproc_prepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + if (rproc->ops->prepare)
> + return rproc->ops->prepare(rproc);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rproc_unprepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + if (rproc->ops->unprepare)
> + return rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static inline
> int rproc_fw_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> {
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index 38607107b7cb..b8481ac969f1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
>
> /**
> * struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers
> + * @prepare: prepare device for code loading
> + * @unprepare: unprepare device after stop
> * @start: power on the device and boot it
> * @stop: power off the device
> * @kick: kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
> @@ -373,6 +375,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
> * panic at least the returned number of milliseconds
> */
> struct rproc_ops {
> + int (*prepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
> + int (*unprepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
> int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
> int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
> void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
> --
> 2.26.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops
2020-04-21 2:52 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-21 2:52 ` Bjorn Andersson
@ 2020-04-21 14:12 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-21 14:12 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-23 5:01 ` Bjorn Andersson
1 sibling, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Suman Anna @ 2020-04-21 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson
Cc: Mathieu Poirier, linux-remoteproc, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel, Loic Pallardy
On 4/20/20 9:52 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 16 Apr 17:20 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
>
>> From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
>>
>> On some SoC architecture, it is needed to enable HW like
>> clock, bus, regulator, memory region... before loading
>> co-processor firmware.
>>
>> This patch introduces prepare and unprepare ops to execute
>> platform specific function before firmware loading and after
>> stop execution.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>
> Do we have an inbound user of these new oops?
Yes, both the TI K3 R5F and DSP remoteproc drivers use these ops, the
patches are already on the lists.
regards
Suman
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
>> ---
>> v1:
>> - Make the direct ops into inline helper functions in line
>> with the comments on the MCU sync series (v1 comments).
>> No change in functionality.
>> - Picked up the Reviewed-by tags
>> v0: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456383/
>>
>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++++
>> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> index d681eeb962b6..e38f627059ac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> @@ -1394,12 +1394,19 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> + /* Prepare rproc for firmware loading if needed */
>> + ret = rproc_prepare_device(rproc);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "can't prepare rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
>> + goto disable_iommu;
>> + }
>> +
>> rproc->bootaddr = rproc_get_boot_addr(rproc, fw);
>>
>> /* Load resource table, core dump segment list etc from the firmware */
>> ret = rproc_parse_fw(rproc, fw);
>> if (ret)
>> - goto disable_iommu;
>> + goto unprepare_rproc;
>>
>> /* reset max_notifyid */
>> rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
>> @@ -1433,6 +1440,9 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>> kfree(rproc->cached_table);
>> rproc->cached_table = NULL;
>> rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
>> +unprepare_rproc:
>> + /* release HW resources if needed */
>> + rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
>> disable_iommu:
>> rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
>> return ret;
>> @@ -1838,6 +1848,9 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
>> /* clean up all acquired resources */
>> rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
>>
>> + /* release HW resources if needed */
>> + rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
>> +
>> rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
>>
>> /* Free the copy of the resource table */
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>> index b389dc79da81..101e6be8d240 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>> @@ -64,6 +64,22 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
>> struct rproc_mem_entry *
>> rproc_find_carveout_by_name(struct rproc *rproc, const char *name, ...);
>>
>> +static inline int rproc_prepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + if (rproc->ops->prepare)
>> + return rproc->ops->prepare(rproc);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int rproc_unprepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + if (rproc->ops->unprepare)
>> + return rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline
>> int rproc_fw_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>> {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>> index 38607107b7cb..b8481ac969f1 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>> @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
>>
>> /**
>> * struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers
>> + * @prepare: prepare device for code loading
>> + * @unprepare: unprepare device after stop
>> * @start: power on the device and boot it
>> * @stop: power off the device
>> * @kick: kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
>> @@ -373,6 +375,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
>> * panic at least the returned number of milliseconds
>> */
>> struct rproc_ops {
>> + int (*prepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
>> + int (*unprepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
>> int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
>> int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
>> void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
>> --
>> 2.26.0
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops
2020-04-21 14:12 ` Suman Anna
@ 2020-04-21 14:12 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-23 5:01 ` Bjorn Andersson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Suman Anna @ 2020-04-21 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson
Cc: Mathieu Poirier, linux-remoteproc, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel, Loic Pallardy
On 4/20/20 9:52 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 16 Apr 17:20 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
>
>> From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
>>
>> On some SoC architecture, it is needed to enable HW like
>> clock, bus, regulator, memory region... before loading
>> co-processor firmware.
>>
>> This patch introduces prepare and unprepare ops to execute
>> platform specific function before firmware loading and after
>> stop execution.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>
> Do we have an inbound user of these new oops?
Yes, both the TI K3 R5F and DSP remoteproc drivers use these ops, the
patches are already on the lists.
regards
Suman
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
>> ---
>> v1:
>> - Make the direct ops into inline helper functions in line
>> with the comments on the MCU sync series (v1 comments).
>> No change in functionality.
>> - Picked up the Reviewed-by tags
>> v0: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456383/
>>
>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++++
>> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> index d681eeb962b6..e38f627059ac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> @@ -1394,12 +1394,19 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> + /* Prepare rproc for firmware loading if needed */
>> + ret = rproc_prepare_device(rproc);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "can't prepare rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
>> + goto disable_iommu;
>> + }
>> +
>> rproc->bootaddr = rproc_get_boot_addr(rproc, fw);
>>
>> /* Load resource table, core dump segment list etc from the firmware */
>> ret = rproc_parse_fw(rproc, fw);
>> if (ret)
>> - goto disable_iommu;
>> + goto unprepare_rproc;
>>
>> /* reset max_notifyid */
>> rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
>> @@ -1433,6 +1440,9 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>> kfree(rproc->cached_table);
>> rproc->cached_table = NULL;
>> rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
>> +unprepare_rproc:
>> + /* release HW resources if needed */
>> + rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
>> disable_iommu:
>> rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
>> return ret;
>> @@ -1838,6 +1848,9 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
>> /* clean up all acquired resources */
>> rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
>>
>> + /* release HW resources if needed */
>> + rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
>> +
>> rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
>>
>> /* Free the copy of the resource table */
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>> index b389dc79da81..101e6be8d240 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>> @@ -64,6 +64,22 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
>> struct rproc_mem_entry *
>> rproc_find_carveout_by_name(struct rproc *rproc, const char *name, ...);
>>
>> +static inline int rproc_prepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + if (rproc->ops->prepare)
>> + return rproc->ops->prepare(rproc);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int rproc_unprepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + if (rproc->ops->unprepare)
>> + return rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline
>> int rproc_fw_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>> {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>> index 38607107b7cb..b8481ac969f1 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>> @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
>>
>> /**
>> * struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers
>> + * @prepare: prepare device for code loading
>> + * @unprepare: unprepare device after stop
>> * @start: power on the device and boot it
>> * @stop: power off the device
>> * @kick: kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
>> @@ -373,6 +375,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
>> * panic at least the returned number of milliseconds
>> */
>> struct rproc_ops {
>> + int (*prepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
>> + int (*unprepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
>> int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
>> int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
>> void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
>> --
>> 2.26.0
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops
2020-04-23 5:01 ` Bjorn Andersson
@ 2020-04-23 5:01 ` Bjorn Andersson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2020-04-23 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suman Anna
Cc: Mathieu Poirier, linux-remoteproc, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel, Loic Pallardy
On Tue 21 Apr 07:12 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
> On 4/20/20 9:52 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Thu 16 Apr 17:20 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
> >
> > > From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
> > >
> > > On some SoC architecture, it is needed to enable HW like
> > > clock, bus, regulator, memory region... before loading
> > > co-processor firmware.
> > >
> > > This patch introduces prepare and unprepare ops to execute
> > > platform specific function before firmware loading and after
> > > stop execution.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> >
> > Do we have an inbound user of these new oops?
>
> Yes, both the TI K3 R5F and DSP remoteproc drivers use these ops, the
> patches are already on the lists.
>
Thanks for confirming Suman, I'll apply this.
Regards,
Bjorn
> regards
> Suman
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
> >
> > > ---
> > > v1:
> > > - Make the direct ops into inline helper functions in line
> > > with the comments on the MCU sync series (v1 comments).
> > > No change in functionality.
> > > - Picked up the Reviewed-by tags
> > > v0: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456383/
> > >
> > > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> > > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++++
> > > 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > index d681eeb962b6..e38f627059ac 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > @@ -1394,12 +1394,19 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > + /* Prepare rproc for firmware loading if needed */
> > > + ret = rproc_prepare_device(rproc);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "can't prepare rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
> > > + goto disable_iommu;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > rproc->bootaddr = rproc_get_boot_addr(rproc, fw);
> > > /* Load resource table, core dump segment list etc from the firmware */
> > > ret = rproc_parse_fw(rproc, fw);
> > > if (ret)
> > > - goto disable_iommu;
> > > + goto unprepare_rproc;
> > > /* reset max_notifyid */
> > > rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
> > > @@ -1433,6 +1440,9 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> > > kfree(rproc->cached_table);
> > > rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> > > rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
> > > +unprepare_rproc:
> > > + /* release HW resources if needed */
> > > + rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
> > > disable_iommu:
> > > rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
> > > return ret;
> > > @@ -1838,6 +1848,9 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > /* clean up all acquired resources */
> > > rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
> > > + /* release HW resources if needed */
> > > + rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
> > > +
> > > rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
> > > /* Free the copy of the resource table */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > > index b389dc79da81..101e6be8d240 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > > @@ -64,6 +64,22 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> > > struct rproc_mem_entry *
> > > rproc_find_carveout_by_name(struct rproc *rproc, const char *name, ...);
> > > +static inline int rproc_prepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > +{
> > > + if (rproc->ops->prepare)
> > > + return rproc->ops->prepare(rproc);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline int rproc_unprepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > +{
> > > + if (rproc->ops->unprepare)
> > > + return rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static inline
> > > int rproc_fw_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> > > {
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > > index 38607107b7cb..b8481ac969f1 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > > @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
> > > /**
> > > * struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers
> > > + * @prepare: prepare device for code loading
> > > + * @unprepare: unprepare device after stop
> > > * @start: power on the device and boot it
> > > * @stop: power off the device
> > > * @kick: kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
> > > @@ -373,6 +375,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
> > > * panic at least the returned number of milliseconds
> > > */
> > > struct rproc_ops {
> > > + int (*prepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
> > > + int (*unprepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
> > > int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
> > > int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
> > > void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
> > > --
> > > 2.26.0
> > >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops
2020-04-21 14:12 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-21 14:12 ` Suman Anna
@ 2020-04-23 5:01 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-23 5:01 ` Bjorn Andersson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2020-04-23 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suman Anna
Cc: Mathieu Poirier, linux-remoteproc, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel, Loic Pallardy
On Tue 21 Apr 07:12 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
> On 4/20/20 9:52 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Thu 16 Apr 17:20 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
> >
> > > From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
> > >
> > > On some SoC architecture, it is needed to enable HW like
> > > clock, bus, regulator, memory region... before loading
> > > co-processor firmware.
> > >
> > > This patch introduces prepare and unprepare ops to execute
> > > platform specific function before firmware loading and after
> > > stop execution.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> >
> > Do we have an inbound user of these new oops?
>
> Yes, both the TI K3 R5F and DSP remoteproc drivers use these ops, the
> patches are already on the lists.
>
Thanks for confirming Suman, I'll apply this.
Regards,
Bjorn
> regards
> Suman
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
> >
> > > ---
> > > v1:
> > > - Make the direct ops into inline helper functions in line
> > > with the comments on the MCU sync series (v1 comments).
> > > No change in functionality.
> > > - Picked up the Reviewed-by tags
> > > v0: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456383/
> > >
> > > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> > > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++++
> > > 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > index d681eeb962b6..e38f627059ac 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > @@ -1394,12 +1394,19 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > + /* Prepare rproc for firmware loading if needed */
> > > + ret = rproc_prepare_device(rproc);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "can't prepare rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
> > > + goto disable_iommu;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > rproc->bootaddr = rproc_get_boot_addr(rproc, fw);
> > > /* Load resource table, core dump segment list etc from the firmware */
> > > ret = rproc_parse_fw(rproc, fw);
> > > if (ret)
> > > - goto disable_iommu;
> > > + goto unprepare_rproc;
> > > /* reset max_notifyid */
> > > rproc->max_notifyid = -1;
> > > @@ -1433,6 +1440,9 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> > > kfree(rproc->cached_table);
> > > rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> > > rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
> > > +unprepare_rproc:
> > > + /* release HW resources if needed */
> > > + rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
> > > disable_iommu:
> > > rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
> > > return ret;
> > > @@ -1838,6 +1848,9 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > /* clean up all acquired resources */
> > > rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
> > > + /* release HW resources if needed */
> > > + rproc_unprepare_device(rproc);
> > > +
> > > rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
> > > /* Free the copy of the resource table */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > > index b389dc79da81..101e6be8d240 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > > @@ -64,6 +64,22 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> > > struct rproc_mem_entry *
> > > rproc_find_carveout_by_name(struct rproc *rproc, const char *name, ...);
> > > +static inline int rproc_prepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > +{
> > > + if (rproc->ops->prepare)
> > > + return rproc->ops->prepare(rproc);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline int rproc_unprepare_device(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > +{
> > > + if (rproc->ops->unprepare)
> > > + return rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static inline
> > > int rproc_fw_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> > > {
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > > index 38607107b7cb..b8481ac969f1 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > > @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
> > > /**
> > > * struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers
> > > + * @prepare: prepare device for code loading
> > > + * @unprepare: unprepare device after stop
> > > * @start: power on the device and boot it
> > > * @stop: power off the device
> > > * @kick: kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
> > > @@ -373,6 +375,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
> > > * panic at least the returned number of milliseconds
> > > */
> > > struct rproc_ops {
> > > + int (*prepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
> > > + int (*unprepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
> > > int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
> > > int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
> > > void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
> > > --
> > > 2.26.0
> > >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-23 5:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-17 0:20 [PATCH 0/2] rproc core patches needed for TI K3 drivers Suman Anna
2020-04-17 0:20 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 0:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops Suman Anna
2020-04-17 0:20 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-21 2:52 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-21 2:52 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-21 14:12 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-21 14:12 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-23 5:01 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-23 5:01 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-17 0:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field Suman Anna
2020-04-17 0:20 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 17:04 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-17 17:04 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-20 4:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20 4:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).