linux-renesas-soc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>,
	Kieran Bingham <kieran@ksquared.org.uk>,
	Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>,
	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] i2c: core: refactor scanning for a client
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 18:45:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200101164522.GA6226@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191231161400.1688-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Hi Wolfram,

Thank you for the patch.

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 05:13:56PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a pattern to check for existence of a client which is copied in
> i2c_detect_address() and i2c_new_scanned_device():
> 
> 1) check if address is valid
> 2) check if address is already registered
> 3) send a message and check the reponse
> 
> Because this pattern will be needed a third time soon, refactor it into
> its own function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> index a1eb28a3cc54..20a726dc78db 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> @@ -2108,29 +2108,39 @@ static int i2c_default_probe(struct i2c_adapter *adap, unsigned short addr)
>  	return err >= 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int i2c_detect_address(struct i2c_client *temp_client,
> -			      struct i2c_driver *driver)
> +static int i2c_scan_for_client(struct i2c_adapter *adap, unsigned short addr,
> +			    int (*probe)(struct i2c_adapter *adap, unsigned short addr))
>  {
> -	struct i2c_board_info info;
> -	struct i2c_adapter *adapter = temp_client->adapter;
> -	int addr = temp_client->addr;
>  	int err;
>  
>  	/* Make sure the address is valid */
>  	err = i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(addr);
> -	if (err) {
> -		dev_warn(&adapter->dev, "Invalid probe address 0x%02x\n",
> -			 addr);
> +	if (WARN(err, "Invalid probe address 0x%02x\n", addr))

Does this deserve a full backtrace ? If so could you mention it in the
commit message ?

With this addressed,

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

>  		return err;
> -	}
>  
>  	/* Skip if already in use (7 bit, no need to encode flags) */
> -	if (i2c_check_addr_busy(adapter, addr))
> -		return 0;
> +	if (i2c_check_addr_busy(adap, addr))
> +		return -EBUSY;
>  
>  	/* Make sure there is something at this address */
> -	if (!i2c_default_probe(adapter, addr))
> -		return 0;
> +	if (!probe(adap, addr))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int i2c_detect_address(struct i2c_client *temp_client,
> +			      struct i2c_driver *driver)
> +{
> +	struct i2c_board_info info;
> +	struct i2c_adapter *adapter = temp_client->adapter;
> +	int addr = temp_client->addr;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	/* Only report broken addresses, busy addresses are no error */
> +	err = i2c_scan_for_client(adapter, addr, i2c_default_probe);
> +	if (err < 0)
> +		return err == -EINVAL ? -EINVAL : 0;
>  
>  	/* Finally call the custom detection function */
>  	memset(&info, 0, sizeof(struct i2c_board_info));
> @@ -2232,26 +2242,9 @@ i2c_new_scanned_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
>  	if (!probe)
>  		probe = i2c_default_probe;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; addr_list[i] != I2C_CLIENT_END; i++) {
> -		/* Check address validity */
> -		if (i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(addr_list[i]) < 0) {
> -			dev_warn(&adap->dev, "Invalid 7-bit address 0x%02x\n",
> -				 addr_list[i]);
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -
> -		/* Check address availability (7 bit, no need to encode flags) */
> -		if (i2c_check_addr_busy(adap, addr_list[i])) {
> -			dev_dbg(&adap->dev,
> -				"Address 0x%02x already in use, not probing\n",
> -				addr_list[i]);
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -
> -		/* Test address responsiveness */
> -		if (probe(adap, addr_list[i]))
> +	for (i = 0; addr_list[i] != I2C_CLIENT_END; i++)
> +		if (i2c_scan_for_client(adap, addr_list[i], probe) == 0)
>  			break;
> -	}
>  
>  	if (addr_list[i] == I2C_CLIENT_END) {
>  		dev_dbg(&adap->dev, "Probing failed, no device found\n");

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-01 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-31 16:13 [RFC PATCH 0/5] i2c: implement mechanism to retrieve an alias device Wolfram Sang
2019-12-31 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] i2c: core: refactor scanning for a client Wolfram Sang
2020-01-01 16:45   ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2020-01-07  9:26   ` Kieran Bingham
2020-01-07  9:53     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-01-07  9:58       ` Kieran Bingham
2020-01-07 10:25       ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-07 10:36         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-01-07 11:23           ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-07 15:03             ` Luca Ceresoli
2020-01-07 16:45               ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-07 16:52                 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-12-31 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] i2c: core: add new variant to check " Wolfram Sang
2020-01-01 16:49   ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-01-07  9:42   ` Kieran Bingham
2019-12-31 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] i2c: core: add function to request an alias Wolfram Sang
2020-01-01 16:55   ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-01-02 18:58     ` Luca Ceresoli
2020-01-02 21:13       ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-02 22:27         ` Luca Ceresoli
2020-01-03  0:10           ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-01-07 15:03             ` Luca Ceresoli
2020-01-07 17:13               ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-01-08 13:27                 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-08 13:31                   ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-01-08 13:38                     ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-08 13:22               ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-08 13:19             ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-08 13:29               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-01-08 13:34               ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-01-02 21:03     ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-21  9:05     ` Peter Rosin
2020-01-07  9:40   ` Kieran Bingham
2020-01-07 17:11     ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-01-07 17:14       ` Kieran Bingham
2020-01-08 13:35         ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-08 13:36           ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-12-31 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] i2c: core: add simple caching to the 'alias' scanning Wolfram Sang
2020-01-07  9:59   ` Kieran Bingham
2020-01-21  9:22   ` Peter Rosin
2019-12-31 16:14 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] simple test case for the I2C alias functionality Wolfram Sang
2019-12-31 16:27 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] i2c: implement mechanism to retrieve an alias device Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200101164522.GA6226@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=jacopo@jmondi.org \
    --cc=kieran@ksquared.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca@lucaceresoli.net \
    --cc=vz@mleia.com \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).