From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
DT <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] RZ/G2UL separate out SoC specific parts
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 20:00:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8sfhHeFa=NAUvZH+DDUjRbdFoCqr4itiYHzxv_jSY9HWg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57e454f4-6767-bf42-8337-ce1f486137ca@linaro.org>
Hi Krzysztof,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 4:38 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 10/10/2022 05:41, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > Hi Rob, Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 6:24 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> This patch series aims to split up the RZ/G2UL SoC DTSI into common parts
> >> so that this can be shared with the RZ/Five SoC.
> >>
> >> Implementation is based on the discussion [0] where I have used option#2.
> >>
> >> The Renesas RZ/G2UL (ARM64) and RZ/Five (RISC-V) have almost the same
> >> identical blocks to avoid duplication a base SoC dtsi (r9a07g043.dtsi) is
> >> created which will be used by the RZ/G2UL (r9a07g043u.dtsi) and RZ/Five
> >> (r9a07g043F.dtsi)
> >>
> >> Sending this as an RFC to get some feedback.
> >>
> >> r9a07g043f.dtsi will look something like below:
> >>
> >> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> >>
> >> #define SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ_NUMBER(nr) (nr + 32)
> >> #define SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ(nr, na) SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ_NUMBER(nr) na
> >>
> >> #include <arm64/renesas/r9a07g043.dtsi>
> >>
> >> / {
> >> ...
> >> ...
> >> };
> >>
> >> Although patch#2 can be merged into patch#1 just wanted to keep them separated
> >> for easier review.
> >>
> >> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/Yyt8s5+pyoysVNeC@spud/T/
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Prabhakar
> >>
> >> Lad Prabhakar (2):
> >> arm64: dts: renesas: r9a07g043: Introduce SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ() macro
> >> to specify interrupt property
> >
> > Can either of you please review patch #1.
> >
>
> Why? This is a DTS patch, isn't it? You should CC rather platform
> maintainers, architecture maintainers and SoC folks (the latter you
> missed for sure). You missed them, so please resend.
>
Mainly because we are using the SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ() macro while
specifying the interrupts property and just wanted to make sure the DT
maintainers are OK with that.
Sure I'll resend the patches CC'ing ARCH maintainers after v6.1-rc1.
Cheers,
Prabhakar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-12 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-29 17:23 [RFC PATCH 0/2] RZ/G2UL separate out SoC specific parts Prabhakar
2022-09-29 17:23 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a07g043: Introduce SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ() macro to specify interrupt property Prabhakar
2022-09-29 17:23 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a07g043: Split out RZ/G2UL SoC specific parts Prabhakar
2022-10-10 9:41 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] RZ/G2UL separate out " Lad, Prabhakar
2022-10-12 15:38 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-10-12 19:00 ` Lad, Prabhakar [this message]
2022-10-25 12:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+V-a8sfhHeFa=NAUvZH+DDUjRbdFoCqr4itiYHzxv_jSY9HWg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
--cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).