linux-renesas-soc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	"thierry.reding@gmail.com" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/7] pinctrl: sh-pfc: remove incomplete flag "cfg->type"
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 10:49:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUqDsMA_uZ+Sen15kgue8DoQee0vd4qmUXmFX+cRT11EA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TYAPR01MB4544031C6A027A3690FFFB77D8DD0@TYAPR01MB4544.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Shimoda-san,

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 7:16 AM Yoshihiro Shimoda
<yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> wrote:
> > From: Linus Walleij, Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 8:02 AM
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:08 AM Yoshihiro Shimoda
> > <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The old commit c58d9c1b26e3 ("sh-pfc: Implement generic pinconf
> > > support") broke the cfg->type flag to PINMUX_TYPE_FUNCTION because
> > > sh_pfc_pinconf_set() didn't call sh_pfc_reconfig_pin().
> > > Now if we fix the cfg->type condition, it gets worse because:
> > >  - Some drivers might be deferred so that .set_mux() will be called
> > >    multiple times.
> > >  - In such the case, the sh-pfc driver returns -EBUSY even if
> > >    the group is the same, and then that driver fails to probe.
> > >
> > > Since the pinctrl subsystem already has such conditions according
> > > to @set_mux and @gpio_request_enable, this patch just remove
> > > the incomplete flag from sh-pfc/pinctrl.c.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
> >
> > This looks like it should have a Fixes: tag as well.
>
> I got it. The Fixes tag should be:
>
> Fixes: c58d9c1b26e3 ("sh-pfc: Implement generic pinconf support")

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

> > Geert will decide what to do with this.
>
> I got it.
>
> > Can all the pinctrl patches be applied independently of the other
> > changes so Geert can apply and send me those patches in his pull
> > requests?
>
> The pinctrl patches (1/7 through 3/7) can be applied on next-20190726
> so I think Geert can apply these patches into his repo.

Looks mostly OK to me (I have some comments on 3/7).
I'll apply it to my local tree, so it will receive some testing on all
boards I have.

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-06  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-08  9:07 [PATCH RFC 0/7] treewide: modify sh-pfc and add support pwm duty zero Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-07-08  9:07 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] pinctrl: sh-pfc: add new flags into struct sh_pfc_pin_config Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-07-08 15:51   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-08-06  8:46   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-07-08  9:07 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] pinctrl: sh-pfc: remove incomplete flag "cfg->type" Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-07-28 23:02   ` Linus Walleij
2019-07-29  5:16     ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-06  8:49       ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2019-08-06  9:23   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-06 11:48     ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-07-08  9:07 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Rollback to mux if requires when the gpio is freed Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-06  9:02   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-06 11:38     ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-06 12:01       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-07-08  9:07 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] dt-bindings: pwm: rcar: Add specific gpios property to output duty zero Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-06  9:21   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-07-08  9:07 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] pwm: rcar: remove a redundant condition in rcar_pwm_apply() Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-06  9:05   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-06 11:39     ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-06 16:00     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-08-07  2:56       ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-07  6:33   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-07-08  9:07 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] pwm: rcar: Add gpio support to output duty zero Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-07  7:03   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-08-08  3:52     ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-08  6:49       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-08  7:02         ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-08  7:31       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-07-08  9:07 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] arm64: dts: renesas: salvator-common: add gpio property into pwm1 Yoshihiro Shimoda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMuHMdUqDsMA_uZ+Sen15kgue8DoQee0vd4qmUXmFX+cRT11EA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).