From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com>
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: add asm/unistd.h UAPI header
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:09:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a30Dmq3vp-+=jvVu8VMe+GKc9dU=+ZF0rzhFiUq2NuJ_w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20181107210939.fuHIwdZhzYIE1UKqYuXaNbjeRKVFR7mWTWWrwQ1XFkE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEn-LTpQ5uTte2bBrEs3uLKtsckkKPUOP+jHw5k-DFAwGCS3WA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 7:30 PM David Abdurachmanov
<david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:08 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:56:15 PST (-0800), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The target is still the next glibc release (Feb 1st) for a stable RV32I ABI.
> > That's progressing well, with one last blocking issue related to some of our
> > floating-point emulation routines before we can submit the port. This should
> > give us ample time to line up the ABIs correctly so everything works.
> >
> > So I think the correct answer here is to drop __ARCH_WANT_STAT64 from RISC-V.
> >
>
> Then if you agree I could do and send v2:
>
> +#ifdef __LP64__
> +#define __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT
> +#endif /* __LP64__ */
Looks good to me.
> Cannot use CONFIG_64BIT as in user space nothing defines it.
> Alternatively I could
> check for __riscv_xlen == 64.
>
> I found _LP64 and __LP64__ being used in kernel, incl. include/uapi/linux/rseq.h
I think older gcc versions were less consistent about those macros, which
is why I introduced __BITS_PER_LONG a long time ago. We now support
gcc-4.6 as the minimum, so using __LP64__ is reliable, and on RISC-V
we obviously have a much newer compiler anyway.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-07 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-05 14:26 [PATCH] riscv: add asm/unistd.h UAPI header David Abdurachmanov
2018-11-05 14:26 ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-11-05 14:43 ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-11-05 14:43 ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-11-05 16:02 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2018-11-05 16:02 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2018-11-05 20:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-05 20:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-07 0:08 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-07 0:08 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-07 18:30 ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-11-07 18:30 ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-11-07 21:09 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2018-11-07 21:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-08 2:10 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-08 2:10 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-08 10:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-08 10:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-08 16:57 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-08 16:57 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-08 10:38 ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-11-08 10:38 ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-11-08 16:57 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-08 16:57 ` Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAK8P3a30Dmq3vp-+=jvVu8VMe+GKc9dU=+ZF0rzhFiUq2NuJ_w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org \
--cc=palmer@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).