From: <Conor.Dooley@microchip.com>
To: <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
<ionela.voinescu@arm.com>, <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] arch_topology: Fix cache attributes detection in the CPU hotplug path
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 14:04:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <343b8031-f2d7-0d53-6967-d2e5925703cf@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8146f6e0-0682-4876-95d0-01e99141330d@microchip.com>
On 15/07/2022 10:16, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On 15/07/2022 10:11, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 04:10:36PM +0000, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
>>> With the GFP_ATOMIC, behaviour is the same as before for me.
>>>
>>
>> So you still get -ENOMEM failure on your platform. It is fine, just that
>> I am bit curious to know why as it succeeds at device_initcall later.
>> I was hoping this might fix your memory allocation failure.
>
> Correct.
I take that back. On today's next with patch 2 applied, I don't see a
problem with no memory, so this does appear to have sorted the memory
allocation failure. Sorry for misleading you & thanks!
With my patches for store_cpu_topology on RISC-V I do see it though,
when called on the boot cpu. I must have mixed up which I had tested.
I have a fix for that though & will update my patches later.
Thanks & apologies!
Conor.
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-15 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-13 13:33 [PATCH -next] arch_topology: Fix cache attributes detection in the CPU hotplug path Sudeep Holla
2022-07-13 14:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-07-13 14:18 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-13 16:04 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-14 14:17 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-14 15:01 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-14 15:27 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-14 16:00 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-14 16:10 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-15 9:11 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-15 9:16 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-15 14:04 ` Conor.Dooley [this message]
2022-07-15 15:41 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-14 17:52 ` Ionela Voinescu
2022-07-18 17:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-07-18 17:57 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-19 10:29 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=343b8031-f2d7-0d53-6967-d2e5925703cf@microchip.com \
--to=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).