Patches for v5.2-rc and v5.3 merge window

Patches for v5.2-rc and v5.3 merge window

[Paul Walmsley]

Folks,

Palmer has asked me to collect patches for the v5.2-rc releases and v5.3 
merge window, so I'll be doing so.  This is just a heads-up so no one is 
surprised to see 'patch queued' responses from me.


- Paul 

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: Patches for v5.2-rc and v5.3 merge window

[Kevin Hilman]

Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> writes:

> Palmer has asked me to collect patches for the v5.2-rc releases and v5.3 
> merge window, so I'll be doing so.  This is just a heads-up so no one is 
> surprised to see 'patch queued' responses from me.

Speaking of v5.2-rc, any chance your DT series will make it for v5.2?
I'm hoping to have upstream v5.2 ready for testing in kernelCI, and
that's one of the last missing pieces.  I just tested it on v5.2-rc3 and
it's working great with mainline u-boot.

The other one is the default defconfig, which I'll submit a patch for
shortly.

Kevin

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: Patches for v5.2-rc and v5.3 merge window

[Paul Walmsley]

+ Rob, devicetree@, Mark

On Wed, 5 Jun 2019, Kevin Hilman wrote:

> Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> writes:
> 
> > Palmer has asked me to collect patches for the v5.2-rc releases and v5.3 
> > merge window, so I'll be doing so.  This is just a heads-up so no one is 
> > surprised to see 'patch queued' responses from me.
> 
> Speaking of v5.2-rc, any chance your DT series will make it for v5.2?

Ideally it would be nice to get acks from the DT folks first for:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20190602080500.31700-3-paul.walmsley@sifive.com/T/#u

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20190602080500.31700-4-paul.walmsley@sifive.com/T/#u

If those come soon, I'd be fine with submitting them for v5.2-rc.  But if 
that stretches much further into the v5.2-rc series, it seems best to 
schedule it for v5.3.


> I'm hoping to have upstream v5.2 ready for testing in kernelCI, and
> that's one of the last missing pieces.  I just tested it on v5.2-rc3 and
> it's working great with mainline u-boot.

OK, great.  Thanks again for your testing help.


- Paul

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv