linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
	Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
Subject: [PATCH v5 6/8] scsi: Only process PM requests if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE
Date: Tue,  8 Dec 2020 21:29:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201209052951.16136-7-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201209052951.16136-1-bvanassche@acm.org>

Instead of submitting all SCSI commands submitted with scsi_execute() to a
SCSI device if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE, only submit RQF_PM (power
management requests) if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE. This patch makes the
SCSI core handle the runtime power management status (rpm_status) as it
should be handled.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index b7ac14571415..91bc39a4c3c3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -249,7 +249,8 @@ int __scsi_execute(struct scsi_device *sdev, const unsigned char *cmd,
 
 	req = blk_get_request(sdev->request_queue,
 			data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE ?
-			REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT : REQ_OP_SCSI_IN, BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT);
+			REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT : REQ_OP_SCSI_IN,
+			rq_flags & RQF_PM ? BLK_MQ_REQ_PM : 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(req))
 		return ret;
 	rq = scsi_req(req);
@@ -1206,6 +1207,8 @@ static blk_status_t
 scsi_device_state_check(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct request *req)
 {
 	switch (sdev->sdev_state) {
+	case SDEV_CREATED:
+		return BLK_STS_OK;
 	case SDEV_OFFLINE:
 	case SDEV_TRANSPORT_OFFLINE:
 		/*
@@ -1232,18 +1235,18 @@ scsi_device_state_check(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct request *req)
 		return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
 	case SDEV_QUIESCE:
 		/*
-		 * If the devices is blocked we defer normal commands.
+		 * If the device is blocked we only accept power management
+		 * commands.
 		 */
-		if (req && !(req->rq_flags & RQF_PREEMPT))
+		if (req && WARN_ON_ONCE(!(req->rq_flags & RQF_PM)))
 			return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
 		return BLK_STS_OK;
 	default:
 		/*
 		 * For any other not fully online state we only allow
-		 * special commands.  In particular any user initiated
-		 * command is not allowed.
+		 * power management commands.
 		 */
-		if (req && !(req->rq_flags & RQF_PREEMPT))
+		if (req && !(req->rq_flags & RQF_PM))
 			return BLK_STS_IOERR;
 		return BLK_STS_OK;
 	}
@@ -2517,15 +2520,13 @@ void sdev_evt_send_simple(struct scsi_device *sdev,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdev_evt_send_simple);
 
 /**
- *	scsi_device_quiesce - Block user issued commands.
+ *	scsi_device_quiesce - Block all commands except power management.
  *	@sdev:	scsi device to quiesce.
  *
  *	This works by trying to transition to the SDEV_QUIESCE state
  *	(which must be a legal transition).  When the device is in this
- *	state, only special requests will be accepted, all others will
- *	be deferred.  Since special requests may also be requeued requests,
- *	a successful return doesn't guarantee the device will be
- *	totally quiescent.
+ *	state, only power management requests will be accepted, all others will
+ *	be deferred.
  *
  *	Must be called with user context, may sleep.
  *
@@ -2587,12 +2588,12 @@ void scsi_device_resume(struct scsi_device *sdev)
 	 * device deleted during suspend)
 	 */
 	mutex_lock(&sdev->state_mutex);
+	if (sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_QUIESCE)
+		scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_RUNNING);
 	if (sdev->quiesced_by) {
 		sdev->quiesced_by = NULL;
 		blk_clear_pm_only(sdev->request_queue);
 	}
-	if (sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_QUIESCE)
-		scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_RUNNING);
 	mutex_unlock(&sdev->state_mutex);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_device_resume);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-09  5:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-09  5:29 [PATCH v5 0/8] Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] block: Fix a race in the runtime power management code Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] block: Introduce BLK_MQ_REQ_PM Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09  6:06   ` Can Guo
2020-12-09  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] ide: Do not set the RQF_PREEMPT flag for sense requests Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] ide: Mark power management requests with RQF_PM instead of RQF_PREEMPT Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] scsi_transport_spi: Set RQF_PM for domain validation commands Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09  7:34   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-09  5:29 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2020-12-09  6:06   ` [PATCH v5 6/8] scsi: Only process PM requests if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE Can Guo
2020-12-09  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] block: Remove RQF_PREEMPT and BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09  6:05   ` Can Guo
2020-12-09  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] block: Do not accept any requests while suspended Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09  6:04   ` Can Guo
2020-12-09  7:36   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201209052951.16136-7-bvanassche@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.kepplinger@puri.sm \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).