From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
Subject: [PATCH v5 6/8] scsi: Only process PM requests if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 21:29:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201209052951.16136-7-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201209052951.16136-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
Instead of submitting all SCSI commands submitted with scsi_execute() to a
SCSI device if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE, only submit RQF_PM (power
management requests) if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE. This patch makes the
SCSI core handle the runtime power management status (rpm_status) as it
should be handled.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index b7ac14571415..91bc39a4c3c3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -249,7 +249,8 @@ int __scsi_execute(struct scsi_device *sdev, const unsigned char *cmd,
req = blk_get_request(sdev->request_queue,
data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE ?
- REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT : REQ_OP_SCSI_IN, BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT);
+ REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT : REQ_OP_SCSI_IN,
+ rq_flags & RQF_PM ? BLK_MQ_REQ_PM : 0);
if (IS_ERR(req))
return ret;
rq = scsi_req(req);
@@ -1206,6 +1207,8 @@ static blk_status_t
scsi_device_state_check(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct request *req)
{
switch (sdev->sdev_state) {
+ case SDEV_CREATED:
+ return BLK_STS_OK;
case SDEV_OFFLINE:
case SDEV_TRANSPORT_OFFLINE:
/*
@@ -1232,18 +1235,18 @@ scsi_device_state_check(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct request *req)
return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
case SDEV_QUIESCE:
/*
- * If the devices is blocked we defer normal commands.
+ * If the device is blocked we only accept power management
+ * commands.
*/
- if (req && !(req->rq_flags & RQF_PREEMPT))
+ if (req && WARN_ON_ONCE(!(req->rq_flags & RQF_PM)))
return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
return BLK_STS_OK;
default:
/*
* For any other not fully online state we only allow
- * special commands. In particular any user initiated
- * command is not allowed.
+ * power management commands.
*/
- if (req && !(req->rq_flags & RQF_PREEMPT))
+ if (req && !(req->rq_flags & RQF_PM))
return BLK_STS_IOERR;
return BLK_STS_OK;
}
@@ -2517,15 +2520,13 @@ void sdev_evt_send_simple(struct scsi_device *sdev,
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdev_evt_send_simple);
/**
- * scsi_device_quiesce - Block user issued commands.
+ * scsi_device_quiesce - Block all commands except power management.
* @sdev: scsi device to quiesce.
*
* This works by trying to transition to the SDEV_QUIESCE state
* (which must be a legal transition). When the device is in this
- * state, only special requests will be accepted, all others will
- * be deferred. Since special requests may also be requeued requests,
- * a successful return doesn't guarantee the device will be
- * totally quiescent.
+ * state, only power management requests will be accepted, all others will
+ * be deferred.
*
* Must be called with user context, may sleep.
*
@@ -2587,12 +2588,12 @@ void scsi_device_resume(struct scsi_device *sdev)
* device deleted during suspend)
*/
mutex_lock(&sdev->state_mutex);
+ if (sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_QUIESCE)
+ scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_RUNNING);
if (sdev->quiesced_by) {
sdev->quiesced_by = NULL;
blk_clear_pm_only(sdev->request_queue);
}
- if (sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_QUIESCE)
- scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_RUNNING);
mutex_unlock(&sdev->state_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_device_resume);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-09 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-09 5:29 [PATCH v5 0/8] Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] block: Fix a race in the runtime power management code Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] block: Introduce BLK_MQ_REQ_PM Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 6:06 ` Can Guo
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] ide: Do not set the RQF_PREEMPT flag for sense requests Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] ide: Mark power management requests with RQF_PM instead of RQF_PREEMPT Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] scsi_transport_spi: Set RQF_PM for domain validation commands Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 7:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-09 5:29 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2020-12-09 6:06 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] scsi: Only process PM requests if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE Can Guo
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] block: Remove RQF_PREEMPT and BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 6:05 ` Can Guo
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] block: Do not accept any requests while suspended Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 6:04 ` Can Guo
2020-12-09 7:36 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201209052951.16136-7-bvanassche@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.kepplinger@puri.sm \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).