* Re: scsi: lpfc: Fix hardlockup in lpfc_abort_handler
[not found] <d06924929def46d2bfca19a5cf2e7b55@h3c.com>
@ 2019-10-10 17:49 ` James Smart
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: James Smart @ 2019-10-10 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhangguanghui, linux-scsi; +Cc: martin.petersen, James Smart
On 10/10/2019 1:59 AM, Zhangguanghui wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> Please refer to the latest patch.
>
> There is a race deadlock in the function lpfc_abort_handler
>
> potential deadlocks arising from lock ordering problems.
>
> It’s the correct order
>
> spin_unlock(&lpfc_cmd->buf_lock)
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
>
> How to solve it ? I think that the patch is reasonable,
>
> can you help me review and commit this patch, Best regards
>
> diff --git a/src/lpfc-12.2.0.0/lpfc_scsi.c b/src/lpfc-12.2.0.0/lpfc_scsi.c
>
> index 3f1375a..19c8505 100644
>
> --- a/src/lpfc-12.2.0.0/lpfc_scsi.c
>
> +++ b/src/lpfc-12.2.0.0/lpfc_scsi.c
>
We confirmed the issue you stated. We are looking at what you proposed
and will be adding a patch that will be posted in our next
patch set after we've put it through some regression testing.
-- james
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2019-10-10 17:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <d06924929def46d2bfca19a5cf2e7b55@h3c.com>
2019-10-10 17:49 ` scsi: lpfc: Fix hardlockup in lpfc_abort_handler James Smart
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).