From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Cc: Yogesh Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com>,
Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>, Julien Su <juliensu@mxic.com.tw>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
zhengxunli@mxic.com.tw
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/18] mtd: spi-nor: Proposal for 8-8-8 mode support
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 14:36:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181021133600.GE8554@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181019145920.43f9d5ec@bbrezillon>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 829 bytes --]
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 02:59:20PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> > The SPI framework changes definitely look OK to me, if everyone agrees
> > that this is a good way to go from a MTD point of view I'm happy to
> > apply them. I have no strong opinion on the MTD bits of the series.
> Actually, Yogesh posted similar patches before me, so maybe you can
> look at this series [1]. The spi/spi-mem side of things is rather
> uncontroversial. Feel free to apply them if you think they're good
> enough to go in.
Ugh, unfortunately he didn't send me them so I'll have to try to find
them on the list and it looks like there's been no review from any of
the other MTD people. It'd be good to get some consensus, yours seems a
bit more complete so my inclination would be to go that way.
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 144 bytes --]
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-21 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-12 8:48 [PATCH RFC 00/18] mtd: spi-nor: Proposal for 8-8-8 mode support Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 01/18] mtd: spi-nor: Add a flash_info entry for Macronix mx25uw51245g Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 02/18] spi: Prepare things for octo mode support Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 03/18] spi: spi-mem: Prepare things for DTR " Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 04/18] spi: spi-mem: Prepare things for dual bytes opcodes support Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 05/18] spi: spi-mem: mxic: Add support for DTR and Octo mode Boris Brezillon
2018-11-18 17:21 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-11-18 17:32 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 06/18] mtd: spi-nor: Move m25p80 code in spi-nor.c Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 07/18] mtd: spi-nor: Rework hwcaps selection for the spi-mem case Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 08/18] mtd: spi-nor: Define the DPI, QPI and OPI hwcaps Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 09/18] mtd: spi-nor: Add spi_nor_{read, write}_reg() helpers Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 10/18] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for X-X-X modes Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 11/18] mtd: spi-nor: Prepare things for 2byte opcodes Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 12/18] mtd: spi-nor: Provide a hook to tweak flash parameters Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 13/18] mtd: spi-nor: Add 8-8-8 mode support to Macronix mx25uw51245g Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 14/18] mtd: spi-nor: Clarify where DTR mode applies Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 15/18] mtd: spi-nor: Add DTR support to the spi-mem logic Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 16/18] mtd: spi-nor: Add the concept of full DTR modes Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 17/18] mtd: spi-nor: Add 8D-8D-8D mode Boris Brezillon
2018-10-12 8:48 ` [PATCH RFC 18/18] mtd: spi-nor: Make sure the 8D-8D-8D can be selected on mx25uw51245g Boris Brezillon
[not found] ` <OF300145A1.D60E7B33-ON48258376.002EDC4B-48258376.0031A14C@LocalDomain>
[not found] ` <OF3005248A.454B9B59-ON48258382.002767AE-48258382.00293E8D@mxic.com.tw>
2019-01-14 8:39 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-19 12:25 ` [PATCH RFC 00/18] mtd: spi-nor: Proposal for 8-8-8 mode support Mark Brown
2018-10-19 12:59 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-21 13:36 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2018-10-22 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-22 12:01 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181021133600.GE8554@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=juliensu@mxic.com.tw \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=masonccyang@mxic.com.tw \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com \
--cc=zhengxunli@mxic.com.tw \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).