linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>,
	Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: usb3503: Convert to use GPIO descriptors
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 12:42:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <402598f1-3230-c48f-c1c0-feda19cb2261@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdaV9zoVzpZ3SW-Nvjo6ytUCEjA6fWuW1FSBciQ24j5SZg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Linus,

On 06.12.2019 10:56, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 10:14 AM Marek Szyprowski
> <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
>> On 06.12.2019 08:55, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>> NAK.
>>>
>>> Sorry, but this patch breaks USB3503 HUB operation on Arndale5250
>>> board. A brief scan through the code reveals that the whole control
>>> logic for the 'intn' gpio is lost.
>> Well, I've checked further and 'intn' logic is there. The issue with
>> Arndale5250 board is something different. Changing the gpio active
>> values in arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts from GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW
>> to GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH fixed operation of usb3503 HUB. I really wonder why
>> it worked fine with non-descriptor code and the ACTIVE_LOW DT flags...
>>
>> I'm not sure how to handle this. Old code works also fine with DT flags
>> changed to GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH, which seems to be a proper value for those
>> gpio lines.
> We should of course fix up the device trees so the polarity in them
> is correct.

Okay. I've checked the driver and dts:

According to the USB3503 datasheet, reset-gpios should be ACTIVE_LOW 
probably for the all boards. The driver itself should be then fixed to 
set reset line to the opposite values: HIGH (ASSERTED) during probe and 
suspend, and LOW (DE-ASSERTED) during normal operation.

With the above assumptions, the following DTS should be fixed:

arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-odroid-common.dtsi: invert RESET gpio 
polarity (to ACTIVE_LOW)

arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts: invert CONNECT gpio polarity 
(to ACTIVE_HIGH)

arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-odroidxu.dts: invert RESET gpio polarity 
(to ACTIVE_LOW)

arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615-wp8548-mangoh-green.dts: invert RESET 
gpio polarity (to ACTIVE_LOW), not sure about INTN gpio

arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-cubietruck-plus.dts: invert RESET gpio 
polarity (to ACTIVE_LOW)

I've tested such changes with your patch on Odroid X2, U3, XU and 
Arndale boards - USB3503 worked fine.

I can prepare patchset with the above changes (dts and the driver logic).

> If the compatibility with elder device trees is mandatory I will make
> a quirk into the gpiolib-of.c that enforce active high on this specific
> GPIO line. This is pretty straight-forward, I can just use the compatible
> of the board and usb3503 in combination to enforce it.

Frankly, I don't care about compatibility with old dtbs. It is already 
broken by other changes in the bindings.

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland


  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-06 11:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20191205145641eucas1p1e3f40dff8a0c8e9ca47425e2370eabbb@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2019-12-05 14:56 ` [PATCH] usb: usb3503: Convert to use GPIO descriptors Linus Walleij
2019-12-06  7:55   ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-12-06  9:14     ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-12-06  9:56       ` Linus Walleij
2019-12-06 11:42         ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2019-12-06 13:43           ` Linus Walleij
2019-12-09 16:33             ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-12-10 23:13               ` Linus Walleij
2019-12-11  8:48                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-12-06  9:58       ` Linus Walleij
2019-12-06 11:52         ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-12-06 13:21           ` Linus Walleij
2019-12-06 13:33             ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-12-06 13:38               ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=402598f1-3230-c48f-c1c0-feda19cb2261@samsung.com \
    --to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefan@agner.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).