From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, "# v5 . 3" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH] xhci: Fix use-after-free regression in xhci clear hub TT implementation
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:18:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e88dd63-9cd6-1149-10a0-960e944ef31f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191014101611.GN13531@localhost>
On 14.10.2019 13.16, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:58:42PM +0300, Mathias Nyman wrote:
>> commit ef513be0a905 ("usb: xhci: Add Clear_TT_Buffer") schedules work
>> to clear TT buffer, but causes a use-after-free regression at the same time
>>
>> Make sure hub_tt_work finishes before endpoint is disabled, otherwise
>> the work will dereference already freed endpoint and device related
>> pointers.
>>
>> This was triggered when usb core failed to read the configuration
>> descriptor of a FS/LS device during enumeration.
>> xhci driver queued clear_tt_work while usb core freed and reallocated
>> a new device for the next enumeration attempt.
>>
>> EHCI driver implents ehci_endpoint_disable() that makes sure
>> clear_tt_work has finished before it returns, but xhci lacks this support.
>> usb core will call hcd->driver->endpoint_disable() callback before
>> disabling endpoints, so we want this in xhci as well.
>>
>> The added xhci_endpoint_disable() is based on ehci_endpoint_disable()
>>
>
> I used essentially the same reproducer as you did for debugging this
> after I first hit it with an actually stalled control endpoint, and this
> patch works also with my fault-injection hack.
>
> I've reviewed the code and it looks good to me except for one mostly
> theoretical issue. You need to check ep->hc_priv while holding the
> xhci->lock in xhci_clear_tt_buffer_complete() or you could end up having
> xhci_endpoint_disable() reschedule indefinitely while waiting for
> EP_CLEARING_TT to be cleared on a sufficiently weakly ordered
> system.
Good point, I'll change that
>
> Since cfbb8a84c2d2 ("xhci: Fix NULL pointer dereference in
> xhci_clear_tt_buffer_complete()") isn't needed anymore and is slightly
> misleading, I suggest amending the patch with the following:
>
I'll add those changes and your tags to the patch
Thanks
Mathias
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-14 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-04 11:59 [PATCH 0/8] xhci fixes for usb-linus Mathias Nyman
2019-10-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 1/8] xhci: Fix false warning message about wrong bounce buffer write length Mathias Nyman
2019-10-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 2/8] xhci: Prevent device initiated U1/U2 link pm if exit latency is too long Mathias Nyman
2019-10-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 3/8] xhci: Check all endpoints for LPM timeout Mathias Nyman
2019-10-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 4/8] xhci: Fix USB 3.1 capability detection on early xHCI 1.1 spec based hosts Mathias Nyman
2019-10-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 5/8] usb: xhci: wait for CNR controller not ready bit in xhci resume Mathias Nyman
2019-10-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 6/8] xhci: Prevent deadlock when xhci adapter breaks during init Mathias Nyman
2019-10-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 7/8] xhci: Increase STS_SAVE timeout in xhci_suspend() Mathias Nyman
[not found] ` <20191006120750.5334F2087E@mail.kernel.org>
2019-10-07 18:51 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-10-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 8/8] xhci: Fix NULL pointer dereference in xhci_clear_tt_buffer_complete() Mathias Nyman
2019-10-07 14:02 ` Johan Hovold
2019-10-08 8:15 ` Mathias Nyman
2019-10-11 12:47 ` Mathias Nyman
2019-10-11 12:58 ` [RFT PATCH] xhci: Fix use-after-free regression in xhci clear hub TT implementation Mathias Nyman
2019-10-14 10:16 ` Johan Hovold
2019-10-14 13:18 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e88dd63-9cd6-1149-10a0-960e944ef31f@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).