From: Francesco Zanella <francesco.zanella@vimar.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, wim@linux-watchdog.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: gpio_wdt: add "start-at-boot" feature
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:28:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b53153c-e890-cf3c-74f7-9106965c23fe@vimar.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210421164228.GB110463@roeck-us.net>
On 21/04/21 18:42, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 06:26:21PM +0200, Francesco Zanella wrote:
>> If "start-at-boot" property is present in the device tree, start pinging
>> hw watchdog at probe, in order to take advantage of kernel configs:
>> - WATCHDOG_HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLED: Avoid possible reboot if hw watchdog was
>> been enabled before the kernel (by uboot for example) and userspace
>> doesn't take control of /dev/watchdog in time;
>> - WATCHDOG_OPEN_TIMEOUT: Reboot if userspace doesn't take control of
>> /dev/watchdog within the timeout.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Francesco Zanella <francesco.zanella@vimar.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/watchdog/gpio_wdt.c | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/gpio_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/gpio_wdt.c
>> index 0923201ce874..1e6f0322ab7a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/gpio_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/gpio_wdt.c
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct gpio_wdt_priv {
>> struct gpio_desc *gpiod;
>> bool state;
>> bool always_running;
>> + bool start_at_boot;
>> unsigned int hw_algo;
>> struct watchdog_device wdd;
>> };
>> @@ -147,6 +148,9 @@ static int gpio_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> priv->always_running = of_property_read_bool(np,
>> "always-running");
>>
>> + priv->start_at_boot = of_property_read_bool(np,
>> + "start-at-boot");
>> +
>> watchdog_set_drvdata(&priv->wdd, priv);
>>
>> priv->wdd.info = &gpio_wdt_ident;
>> @@ -161,7 +165,7 @@ static int gpio_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> watchdog_stop_on_reboot(&priv->wdd);
>>
>> - if (priv->always_running)
>> + if (priv->always_running || priv->start_at_boot)
>> gpio_wdt_start(&priv->wdd);
>
> So the only real difference to always_running is that always_running
> doesn't stop the watchdog on close but keeps it running.
>
> Does that really warrant another property ? Why not just use
> always-running ?
>
> The special use case of being able to stop the watchdog doesn't seem
> to be worth the trouble. Please explain your use case.
>
> Guenter
>
You got the point.
I would like to be able to stop the watchdog when I want.
From my point of view always_running is used in the very special
case when the wdt chip can't be stopped.
I want a normal wdt that can be stopped (for example during a system
update), but I want it to start at boot for the 2 reasons that I
explained before:
- I need continuity in hw wdt pinging because I start in uboot,
so I take advantage of WATCHDOG_HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLED that makes
the kernel to do that job; but it is triggered only if it is
started at probe, if I'm not wrong.
- I would like to monitor with the wdt also the kernel at boot,
and more importantly handle the case when the userspace app
doesn't take control of /dev/watchdog for whatever reason
within the timeout set with WATCHDOG_OPEN_TIMEOUT.
Hope that this explain my target.
Thanks for your attention,
Francesco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-22 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-21 16:26 [PATCH 0/2] GPIO WDT "start-at-boot" property Francesco Zanella
2021-04-21 16:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: gpio-wdt: add "start-at-boot" Francesco Zanella
2021-04-21 16:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-04-22 16:28 ` Francesco Zanella
2021-04-21 16:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: gpio_wdt: add "start-at-boot" feature Francesco Zanella
2021-04-21 16:42 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-04-22 16:28 ` Francesco Zanella [this message]
2021-04-22 18:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-04-23 9:47 ` Francesco Zanella
2021-04-23 11:36 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-04-23 14:24 ` Francesco Zanella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1b53153c-e890-cf3c-74f7-9106965c23fe@vimar.com \
--to=francesco.zanella@vimar.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).